Back to Mobile View

A Simple Money Move That Could Save Social Security

Posted 6:00AM 01/20/12 Retirement
Comments Text Size A A A
Social SecurityIt's hard to be optimistic about Social Security. With many experts pointing to Social Security's imminent collapse and politicians calling it a Ponzi scheme, millions of retirees and near-retirees now see their financial future in jeopardy.

But what if you were given the choice of delaying taking Social Security in exchange for a bigger payoff down the road? What if our doing so would save the entire Social Security system for generations to come?

How Much Say Do You Really Have?

Right now, the year you were born determines what your normal retirement age is. You do, however, have a choice about when to start tapping into your Social Security benefits -- within limits.

You have an eight-year window -- any time after you turn 62 to the time you turn 70 -- to start getting your monthly checks. And the longer you wait, the bigger those checks will be.

But what if you could put off the payday even past the age of 70 in exchange for even bigger monthly payments? And what if, rather than taking the full amount you're entitled to when you retire, you could choose to take only a portion of your expected monthly payment and open up the potential to get bigger checks down the road?

One insurance expert thinks that such flexibility -- giving retirees more choices about how they take Social Security -- could save the entire system from the doom-and-gloom end so many fear.

Planning a Semi-Retirement Party

Jerome Golden, who helped develop a variable annuity product that pays guaranteed annual income for life, believes that the key to Social Security's survival is to address the new realities of older American workers.

One of those new realities is this: A lot of people plan to continue to work -- in some capacity -- well into their "retirement" years.

These people will have additional income to cover costs, so they'll be less reliant on a monthly check from Uncle Sam. They can leave those funds in the trust and prevent it from going bust, as it is scheduled to do in in 2036.

Are We Just Rearranging Deck Chairs Here?

Let's say that customized Social Security options would indeed save the program money, as Golden asserts in an op-ed piece from December. That assertion raises an important question: Why would beneficiaries take voluntary steps that would give up value?

Golden says that even a modest rate of seniors postponing collecting their benefits could save the Social Security program $200 billion-$400 billion in the next 10 years. But those savings come from not having to pay beneficiaries during the period they're deferring their benefits.

At some point in the future, the higher payments due those retirees have to get paid -- and that's when the big savings could potentially disappear.

In fact, since the proposal states that its reform aspects aren't designed to cut the lifetime value of anyone's Social Security benefit, timing is the key to the proposal. Golden argues that putting off having to pay some retirees will help Social Security get through a demographic bump of Baby Boomers.

But trying to persuade people already nervous about their retirement finances to put off getting benefits could be a tough sell.

What You Can Do Right Now

Although it has its downsides and makes some big assumptions, the Social Security reform proposal has a lot of merit. Having additional options is always a plus for participants. At worst, you can simply pick the same benefits you'd be entitled to receive under the current program. If you think you can do better with the new options, you'll pick them.

Any move to acknowledge Social Security's problems is a good one. But the prudent thing to do is to take your own steps to protect your financial health from any future problems with Social Security. Given the difficulty in getting any sort of entitlement reform passed -- let alone such a fundamental shift in the way the program offers its benefits -- you simply can't afford to count on such a solution happening quickly enough to rescue your retirement.

For more on Social Security and its future:

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

1149 Comments

Filter by:
ha6ai

How about not cutting the tax meant to pay for it by over 16% like Obama just did, in order to try to buy our votes with our own money.

(12.4% dividded by 2% = over 16%) Obama has raised the deficit and long-term debt.

Yesterday at 3:08 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
RetcoC76

Have each and every politican join the social security system. They enjoy their own seperate system which the American tax payer is not a part of.

January 27 2012 at 4:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike

The "petrodollar" system was a brilliant political and economic move. It forced the world's oil money to flow through the US Federal Reserve, creating ever-growing international demand for both US dollars and US debt. The petrodollar system spread beyond oil: the majority of international trade is done in US dollars. That means that from Russia to China, Brazil to South Korea, every country aims to maximize the US-dollar surplus garnered from its export trade to buy oil.

As oil usage increased in the 1980s, demand for the US dollar rose with it, lifting the US economy to new heights. But even without economic success at home the US dollar would have soared, because the petrodollar system created consistent international demand for US dollars, which in turn gained in value. A strong US dollar allowed Americans to buy imported goods at a massive discount - the petrodollar system essentially creating a subsidy for US consumers at the expense of the rest of the world. Here, finally, the US hit on a downside: The availability of cheap imports hit the US manufacturing industry hard, and the disappearance of manufacturing jobs remains one of the biggest challenges in resurrecting the US economy today.

There is another downside, a potential threat now lurking in the shadows. The value of the US dollar is determined in large part by the fact that oil is sold in US dollars. If that trade shifts to a different currency, countries around the world won't need all their US money. The resulting sell-off of US dollars would weaken the currency dramatically.

January 27 2012 at 3:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Derrick Family

Reality check: What if a person delays receipt of SS beyond age 70 and learns the Trust is bankrupt? We all assume that government will be truthful as to when the SS Trust becomes insolvent, will they? What if government continues borrowing against the SS Trust thereby moving it's insolvency forward? Hate to sound like "gloom and doom" but every investor must self-check and face reality of his/her investment plans going south and plan accordingly. Here's a good idea...mandate that Washington keep their hands out of the cookie jar? or Make SS Trust payout be restricted to only those who actually pay into it? or investigate all those who fraudulently are on SS due to a fictitious disability? To all those born on or after 1974; I hope you have alternate plans for your retirement because the warning has been posted. We all can only hope that our healthcare system is reformed long before this so as to bring costs down...certainly controlling college costs is a step in the right direction so graduating doctors aren't repaying $150k in tuition! Finally, government is uncovering some of the problems....

January 27 2012 at 10:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike

Tehran Pushes to Ditch the US Dollar

India and Iran are negotiating deal to trade oil for gold. Does this matter, you ask? It strikes at both the value of the US dollar and today's high-tension standoff with Iran.

Officially the US & EU is Tehran must be punished for efforts to develop a nuclear weapon. Sanctions on Iran's oil exports meant to isolate Iran and depress the value of its currency to a point that the country crumbles.

Sanctions will not achieve their goals. Iran is far from isolated and its friends - like India - will stand by the oil-producing nation until the US backs down or acknowledges the real matter the American dollar as the global reserve currency.

In the 1970s a deal cemented the US dollar as the only currency to buy and sell crude oil, and from that monopoly on oil trade with the US dollar as the reserve currency for global trades in most commodities and goods. Massive demand for US dollars ensued, pushing the dollar's value up. Countries stored their excess US dollars savings in US Treasuries, giving the US government a vast pool of credit.

If the US dollar loses its position as the global reserve currency, the consequences for America are dire. The dollar's valuation stems from its lock on the oil industry - if that monopoly fades, so too will the value of the dollar. Global fiat currency relationships will change. Gold will rise. Uncertainty around paper money always bodes well for gold, and these are uncertain days indeed.

GOT GOLD?

January 27 2012 at 10:41 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
savemycountry911

They are betting we won't live to see 70.

January 26 2012 at 8:11 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to savemycountry911's comment
savemycountry911

You can already opt to wait 'til 70 to collect if you want. Does anyone trust the govt. that much?

January 26 2012 at 8:17 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Robert & Lisa

This is a great plan, because with Obama and thugs government takeover of health care, they can just ration healthcare and make you die earlier. Our genius corrupt politicians pull the wool over our eyes again...

January 26 2012 at 8:00 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Mike

Another suggestion to enhance this concept -- what if people who have available funds to retire on without drawing some or all their social security could will a portion of their social security to their heirs. Maybe 10, 20, 30 percent or ????

January 26 2012 at 5:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
garydpdx

The author is right, it's going to be a hard sell given all that most folks have paid for FICA in their working life. And it's not getting more than one paid in (the problem with longer lifespans, now) but trying to get back was you had paid.

January 26 2012 at 2:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
donald

why cap at $106,000? Remove cap take in many $'s

January 25 2012 at 12:35 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
3 replies to donald's comment

Compare Mortgage Rates

Mortgage Rates by Zillow
Follow Us

Headlines From DailyFinance Partners


DailyFinance Sitemap | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | HELP | Advertise With Us

© Copyright 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved