Back to Mobile View

What Will You Do When Social Security's Trust Runs Dry?

Posted 6:30AM 01/18/12 Retirement
Comments Text Size A A A

What Will You Do When Social Security's Trust Runs Dry?Got a calendar handy -- one that goes to the year 2036? It might sound crazy to schedule for an event that is set to take place in 24 years, but you should go ahead and do just that.

That's because the year 2036 will be monumental in the fiscal landscape of the nation -- it's when Social Security's much-discussed Trust Fund is estimated to run out of money. When that happens, it's anticipated Social Security benefits will have to be cut by about a quarter.

That spells trouble for men who are 56 or younger and women about 59 or younger. If you are below those ages, Social Security's actuarial table expects you to still be alive when 2036 comes around -- putting you at risk of getting hit by that benefit cut.

How Long Will You Be Affected?

Of course, there's no way to know with certainty how long you'll live, but an actuarial table can get you in ballpark-guessing range. The chart below shows some estimates on how long you can expect to be around once the Trust Fund runs out:

Age in 2012
Age in 2036
Surviving Men -- Estimated Years Remaining in 2036 (*)
Surviving Women -- Estimated Years Remaining in 2036 (*)
65
89
4.22
5.06
60
84
6.06
7.26
55
79
8.41
10.03
50
74
11.21
13.22
45
69
14.40
16.79
40
64
17.92
20.69
35
59
21.69
24.82
30
54
25.68
29.14
(*) Based on Social Security 2007 Period Life Table
Data from the Social Security Administration

Think about that for a minute. If you're 50 in 2012, you'll be 74 in 2036, when the Trust Fund is expected to be emptied. If you're still around then, you'll still have an estimated 11-plus years if you're male or, for females, 13 or more years of life -- and expenses -- ahead of you.

Back to the Grind in Your Golden Years

With your anticipated benefits cut, if you're not prepared when that day comes, you'll be faced with a stark choice: Live on less, or go back to work -- at 74.

Social Security's average retiree payout is currently in the neighborhood of a minimum-wage job. There's not much in the way of padding in that level of income, and losing a significant portion of it could be devastating to those who aren't ready.

The Alternative to Going Back to Work

If there is a bright side to the train wreck, it's that Social Security's collapse is 24 years away. That's still enough time for you to prepare for what the future has in store.

So, you can either beef-up your short-order cooking skills for when you have to unretire, or you can beef up your nest egg to compensate for the future benefit reduction. To make the latter route work, the time to start is now, especially if you don't have tons of cash to invest every month.

If you're both diligent about the effort and are willing to take the risks necessary to potentially earn decent returns, you can turn a modest, consistent effort into a decent nest egg. The table below shows what you could end up with 24 years from now, based on a handful of potential investment amounts and return rates:

Monthly Investment
10% Annual Return
8% Annual Return
6% Annual Return
4% Annual Return
$200
$237,938.32
$173,329.07
$128,223.16
$96,451.82
$150
$178,453.74
$129,996.80
$96,167.37
$72,338.87
$100
$118,969.16
$86,664.53
$64,111.58
$48,225.91
$50
$59,484.58
$43,332.27
$32,055.79
$24,112.96
Data from author's calculations.

Of course, as anyone who invested through the recent lost decade can attest, earning consistently double-digit returns is anything but certain. But if you take a closer look at that above table, what should jump out at you is that the amount of money you sock away matters at least as much as the rate of return you earn on that money.

So in essence, the act of saving and investing for the future itself is what will make the difference when it comes to covering Social Security's pending shortfall.

The choice is yours -- figure out how save a bit more now, or figure out how to live on less later. What you'll do when the money runs out depends in large part on which decision you make today. After all, if you don't start saving now, the choice will be made for you when your Social Security check gets reduced.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

526 Comments

Filter by:
tencentz

Have the government quit stealing from Social Security and you quit pushing the agenda preaching the status quo.

Term limits for congress and a serious budget to continue to fund Social Security properly instead of setting up methods for destroying it.

You are a broken record.

Thursday at 12:43 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
peanutvicky

If the goverment stop brrow from social security it might survive. Brrowing means returning the money you brrow.
But the goverment doesn't return it so it is STEALING from Social Security.
Let the goverment steal from someone else. And if you think the Congress will pass a bill for tax on those making more think agin. Because Why would those in congress want to pay taxes they owe.

Wednesday at 4:18 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ralph A. Baglino

I have e-mailed this statement to the following, John Mc Cain, John Kyl, AARP, Social Security, the White House and Barack Obama, with no response, this may not be the solution, however it would help if they take the $106,800.00 limit off of Social Security, and have no limit, it won't hurt the average working individual, one celebrity who makes 100,000,000.00 a year only has to work two hours and twenty minutes to make the limit.
The celebrity would only have to contribute 6.2% and there employer the other 6.2%, for a total contribution for the year of $12,400,000.00 into Social Security, as opposed to there $13,243.20, really doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out!

Wednesday at 1:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
z4rock

This is an absurd artical. SS already spends way more than collects, and it will spend more than it collects in 24 years. It will never "run dry" as long as one person is paying in.

January 26 2012 at 10:50 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to z4rock's comment
savemycountry911

Come again?

January 26 2012 at 7:35 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Mike

"SOCIAL" security is SOCIAL-ISM! Supporters of socialism are SOCIAL-IST! Sorry but conservatism means no socialism even if it cost you.

January 25 2012 at 6:27 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Mike's comment
savemycountry911

I'll take what I paid for thank you.

January 26 2012 at 8:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike

There is NO soc sec fund, never has been. It all went to the general fund and has been spent. To bad so sad you got shafted by the political class, all of them. Got gold?

January 25 2012 at 6:26 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Mike

waldoknowswhere
So if there was never a Fund , how do all the retired people get their checks each month ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------Good question I'm impressed! All payments are dispersed by US Treasury ( read the check ) straight from the general fund. General fund expenditures are far greater than fed tax income. The difference is ALL borrowed mostly from China at first but now they aren't lending and the Treasury goes directly to the fed res for NEWLY printed/created electronically ( out of thin air ) money. We have more debt to sell than the world is buying so the only place left is the fed reserve. We are sooo screwed if you don’t have any real money that is! Got gold?

January 25 2012 at 6:26 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Joel Collins

I'll be 90 years old and probablty too senility to care or alternatively worm food.

January 25 2012 at 5:34 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
tgaj49

IF YOU DON'T PAY INTO IT YOU DON'T COLLECT IT..........IT'S AS SIMPLE AS THAT........TAKE ALL THE FREE LOADING PARASITES THAT DIDN'T PAY A CENT INTO IT.......... OFF .............. AND YES I'M TALKING ABOUT THE ONES THAT COME INTO THIS COUNTRY FOR A FREE RIDE!

January 24 2012 at 11:58 AM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
gopispoison666

Raising the retirement age is just another way of having Social Security "wither on the vine." The idea that people living longer is a pure loss for Social Security is a fraud. Why? Because people living longer means Social Security gets more income. Because people living longer means, on percentage, Social Security has to pay much less in Survivor benefits, which are payable to the dependents of people who die young.

Because one of he greatest problems in the nation today is lack of decent paying jobs, we SHOULD be talking about EARLIER retirement, say, at 62 with full benefits, and raising the Social Security taxes to compensate. I am fully aware that the GOP and their noxious networks in the media have the people of the USA convinced that they are being taxed to death, but it's a BIG LIE. Tax rates here in the USA are among the lowest in the industrialized world and so are the levels of service. On top of that, we spend almost as much on "defense" as the rest of the world combined.

The idea of raising the retirement age to a level that will have grandchildren and grandparents competing for jobs is patently insane. Pay what is necessary to get people retired, and get those wages back up to something decent.

January 24 2012 at 11:03 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to gopispoison666's comment
gopispoison666

And yes, of course, remove the cap on payments to Social Security. Also a tax on UNEARNED INCOME, like capital gains and dividends, for Social Security, should be instituted as well. ALL TH E special tax advantages doled out to unearned income, with the one exception of the deduction for the sale of a principle residence, (which is "withering on the vine" anyway due to end of the housing bubble) should be removed.

January 24 2012 at 11:07 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Compare Mortgage Rates

Mortgage Rates by Zillow
Follow Us

Headlines From DailyFinance Partners


DailyFinance Sitemap | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | HELP | Advertise With Us

© Copyright 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved