No Need to Change That Lightbulb... Until Late Next Year


LightbulbsThe lightbulb is dead... long live the lightbulb! Four years ago, the U.S. Congress, to great fanfare, passed a law aiming to phase out the incandescent lightbulb in favor of longer-lasting, more energy-efficient alternatives. Recently, to even more fanfare, the U.S. Congress changed its mind.

Rather than starting the phase-out on Jan. 1 with a ban on the sale of 100-watt incandescent bulbs, as envisioned in the 2007 law, Congress has instructed government agencies to sit tight till Sept. 30, 2012. What happens after that is anyone's guess.

A Bright Idea?

Whether this is good news or bad news is a matter of opinion. "Pro-lightbulb" folks will never like Washington telling them what to do with their lives -- even (or perhaps, especially) if it's something they'd probably do on their own if there wasn't some politician nagging them about it.

lightbulbOn the other hand, "anti-lightbulb" people will tell you it's silly to spend $0.10 per kilowatt hour on 19th-century lighting technology when we can stretch that dime so much farther along the curlicues of a compact fluorescent lightbulb (CFL)... or even better, an LED.

Energy Efficiency 101

For anyone not yet aware, these are the two big "improvements" in lighting technology lately. CFLs are basically "lightbulb-size" versions of the buzzing fluorescent tubes that have been the bane of America's cubicle serfs for decades. Thanks to rapidly scaled production, they're not all that much more expensive than incandescents these days -- but they last upward of five years, and they cost much, much less to operate than a conventional incandescent.

LEDs, in contrast, are the next big thing. They last longer than CFLs, cost even less to operate, and don't contain toxic mercury. On the downside, though, production isn't plentiful, and as a result the things cost an arm and a leg to begin with -- perhaps $25 a pop to outfit a standard household light fixture.

As Patrick Martin pointed out here on DailyFinance a couple of months ago, it's this $25 start-up cost that keeps many homeowners from buying into the LED concept. Perversely, though, what the LED industry needs to get prices down is for more people to buy them. This would increase demand, grow the scale of production, and deliver greater efficiencies to the manufacturers as a result. This would in turn enable manufacturers to charge less per bulb... and attract even more buyers, in a true virtuous cycle of price drops.

To date, of course, it's been more of a Catch-22 situation for the LED industry... but perhaps not for long.

How Many Dollars Does It Cost to Change a Lightbulb?

In a recent report on conventional lighting's "heavy users," The Wall Street Journal calculated how LEDs are already beginning to make economic sense to corporate buyers.

Using the example of a Wal-Mart (WMT) or Target (TGT) "big box" store that maintains (and lights) acres of parking lots surrounding it, the Journal paints the following picture: The lights in these lots are generally located on poles 20 or 40 feet off the ground. Changing bulbs at such a height is no easy task, requiring "a bucket truck and an electrician to replace those lamps every two years."

Even if a company is buying the cheapest possible incandescent bulbs for these lights, it's paying through the nose in equipment rental and labor to change them when they go dark. This being the case, it might make sense to pay a bit more up front for a fancy LED light if doing so lets you go a decade or more between changings.

Indeed, according to results just in from a case study conducted at a Wal-Mart in Kansas, it does make cents -- and dollars, too. Comparing the costs of lighting a parking lot with LEDs to lighting the lot with conventional bulbs, the study found that an average Wal-Mart can cut its annual lighting costs by more than 12% by going with the newer technology. The reason: While the bulbs cost much more, the initial installation doesn't. More important, the company spends only about 60% its pre-LED rate on electricity, and reaps a threefold savings on maintenance costs!

What's It Mean to You?

"Good for Wal-Mart," you say. "But what's in it for me?" And I can tell you in one word: scale.

What this study means, in a nutshell, is that already businesses are finding they've reached the tipping point at which it makes sense to spend big bucks buying lots of LED lights. As they begin doing this, manufacturers will increase production, spread production costs among more lights -- and drive the cost of each individual LED light down for everybody. The lightbulb is dead... long live the LED!

Motley Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of, nor is he short, any companies named above, but The Motley Fool owns shares of Wal-Mart Stores, and Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Wal-Mart Stores as well as creating a diagonal call position in Wal-Mart Stores.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Intro to Retirement

Get started early planning for your long term future.

View Course »

What is Inflation?

Why do prices go up?

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

A LED is only efficient when it's summer and you don't need to heat your house, or used outside. When a incandescent bulb is used, the "waste heat" is used to heat the inside of your home. Therefore it is 100 % efficient.. Efficiency needs to measured relative to it's environment.

May 04 2012 at 11:09 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kathleen G

I had one of these screwy bulbs. It didn't last very long and cut my finger taking it out. No more. Wonder how much mercury I got in me and around the house?

January 01 2012 at 7:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

I just heard today Dec. 29th. that these new bulbs contain "mercury" and other TOXIC substances. If true we had better
make sure we do not drop any because if they break will the Government pay for the Hasmat crew to clean and secure Our homes....

December 29 2011 at 8:52 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

I tried the new bulbs. They don't burn as bright and burn out faster. Not to mention the mercury hazard. You greenies are nuts. What will happen when there is a big earthaquake in South Cal with all those office buildings?

December 29 2011 at 7:59 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

YOU DON'T HAVE TO CHANGE OUT YOUR OLD LIGHT BULBS NEXT YEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You can use up your old ones. The title is another case of Huff Post misinformation.

December 29 2011 at 1:32 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

The age old question is finally answered....."How many Democrats does it take to change a light bulb?" "All of them will sit and scream at Republicans and other real Americans for not bowing to their noise" I have bought a very large quantity of incandesent bulbs ... I care far more for my sight than being a damn tree hugger for something that is a total sham only to bring everyone in the US to the screwed up level of Europe.

December 29 2011 at 12:31 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to parthenon1's comment

you are woefully ignorant. please research the news for yourself and stop listening to Michelle Bachmann.

December 29 2011 at 4:39 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Jeff's comment

Jeff, jeff. You should stop listening to the lunatic left.

December 29 2011 at 7:56 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down

LOL. I too have stocked up on the good bulbs.

December 29 2011 at 7:55 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Basically my whole house in on CFLs ... Christmas lights are LED.
Other than using a 75 w in place of 60s in some spots no problems - some are "duds" and have to be replaced short term.. otherwise they last and last.... turn the dead ones at the big box hardware store that I am at every two weeks or so anyhow. So far the only one that broke hit the floor (old ones are hard to clean up when this happens)...... ammount of mercury in one is nothing like the "ball of it" that we played with in school every couple of years - or what comes out of many power plants (most of us turned out mentally oK) Have no experence with dimmables.. but have a couple in enclosed space (low wattage) they have lasted.

December 29 2011 at 9:51 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

I am buying all the old bulbs I can find. No CFL's in my home.

December 28 2011 at 9:19 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jbdunkin123's comment

I enjoy your ignorance. If you discovered facts for yourself, you would know that incandescent bulbs will still be sold and widely available after this bill goes into effect. They will just be a minimum of 30% more efficient. I bet you also didn't realize that this bill was passed by the Bush administration and widely accepted by Republicans, until they decided to turn the issue into fodder for fools and campaign against it.

December 29 2011 at 4:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Jeff's comment

I tried those lib bulbs. They don't burn as bright and burn out faster.

December 29 2011 at 7:56 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down

Thenew bulbs contain mercury.I know everyone willdispose of them properly.Yeh right.--Congress must have really got a good pay off

December 28 2011 at 9:17 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

I upgraded a bathroom fixture to LED, yep paid a lot more for it.. I have CFL's but since the report came out yesterday that you have to remove burn't out cfl bulbs right away or risk them catching on fire, I am worried about CFL's.

December 28 2011 at 6:41 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply