- Days left

House GOP Rejects 2-Month Payroll Tax Cut

House GOP rejects 2-month payroll tax cutWASHINGTON (AP) - The House Tuesday rejected legislation to extend a payroll tax cut and jobless benefits for two months, drawing a swift rebuke from President Barack Obama that Republicans were threatening higher taxes on 160 million workers on Jan. 1.

Obama, in an appearance in the White House briefing room after the House vote, said the two-month compromise is the only way to stop payroll taxes from going up by two percentage points.

"Now let's be clear," Obama said in a surprise appearance in the White House briefing room. "The bipartisan compromise that was reached on Saturday is the only viable way to prevent a tax hike on January 1st. The only one."

Obama said failure to pass the Senate version of the payroll tax cut extension could endanger the U.S. economic recovery, which he described as "fragile but moving in the right direction."

House Republicans controlling the chamber want instead immediate negotiations with the Senate on a year-long plan. But the Senate's top Democrat on Tuesday again ruled out talks until the House passes the stopgap measure.

"President Obama needs to call on Senate Democrats to go back into session ... and resolve this bill as soon as possible," said House Speaker Boehner, R-Ohio. "I need the president to help out."

If Congress doesn't break the stalemate and pass a bill by the end of the year, payroll taxes will go up by almost $20 a week for a worker making a $50,000 salary. Almost 2 million people could lose unemployment benefits as well, and doctors would bear big cuts in Medicare payments.

The House vote, 229-193, kicks the measure back to the Senate, where the bipartisan two-month measure passed on Saturday by a sweeping 89-10 vote. The Senate then promptly left Washington for the holidays. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., says he won't allow bargaining until the House approves the Senate's short-term measure.

"I have been trying to negotiate a yearlong extension with Republicans for weeks, and I am happy to continue doing so as soon as the House of Representatives passes the bipartisan compromise to protect middle-class families, but not before then," Reid said.

The House vote caps a partisan debate on Obama's jobs agenda, which has featured numerous campaign-style appearances but little real bipartisan negotiation, other than Senate talks last week that produced the two-month extension.

The Senate's short-term, lowest-common-denominator approach would renew a 2 percentage point cut in the Social Security payroll tax, plus jobless benefits averaging about $300 a week for the long-term unemployed, and would prevent a 27 percent cut in Medicare payments to doctors. The two-month, $33 billion cost would be financed by a 0.10 percentage point hike in home loan guarantee fees charged by mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which the administration says would raise the monthly payment on a typical $210,000 loan by about $15 a month.

The House passed a separate plan last week that would have extended the payroll tax cut for one year. But that version also contained spending cuts opposed by Democrats and tighter rules for jobless benefits.

Both the House and Senate bills included a provision designed to force Obama to make a decision on construction of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, which would deliver up to 700,000 barrels of oil daily from tar sands in Alberta, Canada, to refineries in Texas. The provision requires him to issue the needed permit unless he declares the pipeline would not serve the national interest.

Democrats and the White House had reversed course and accepted GOP demands on Keystone, which contributed to sweeping Senate GOP support for the two-month measure. The White House signaled that Obama would block the project.

Until this weekend, it was assumed that Boehner had signed off on the Senate measure. After all, it was agreed to by Boehner's trusted confidante, Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. Boehner declined on several occasions Friday to reject the idea.

But rank-and-file House Republicans erupted in frustration at the Senate legislation, which drops changes to the unemployment insurance system pressed by conservatives, a freeze in the salaries of federal workers and cuts to President Barack Obama's health care law.

Also driving their frustration was that the Senate, as it so often does, appeared intent on leaving the House holding the bag - pressuring House lawmakers to go along with its plan. Tuesday's vote technically puts the onus back on the Senate - but also invites a full-blown battle with Obama, whose poll numbers have inched up during the battling over his jobs initiative.

Both sides were eager to position themselves as the strongest advocates of the payroll tax cut, with House Republicans accusing the Senate of lollygagging on vacation and Senate Democrats countering that the House was seeking a partisan battle rather than taking the obvious route of approving the stopgap bill to buy more time for negotiations.

"If you say you want to do this for a year, put your vote where your rhetoric is," said Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas, a member of the House GOP leadership. "If you're not willing to work over the holidays, admit to the American people that you're not willing to work over the holidays."

"Right now Americans want two things from their Congress: middle class tax relief and compromise," said Rep. Steve Israel of New York, chairman of the House Democrats' fundraising committee. "House Republican partisanship failed on both counts."

A lapse of the tax cut means that about $2.5 billion a week more would be withheld from paychecks, though the money could be returned retroactively to taxpayers.

Payroll processors say the two-month Senate version is too complicated. It extends the tax cut, which lowers the Social Security tax to 4.2 percent from 6.2 percent, for only two months. And it limits the lower rate to wages up to $18,350 through Feb. 29. Wages above that amount would be taxed at the old 6.2 percent rate.

The wage limit is meant to make sure upper-income taxpayers don't benefit more than others if the rate goes reverts to 6.2 percent March 1. The Social Security tax applies only to the first $110,100 in annual wages. Without a wage limit, high earners could pay the lower rate on a big chunk - perhaps all - of their Social Security tax obligation. Others would end up paying the higher rate on most of their earnings.

Payroll companies say it would be difficult to adjust their computer systems to reflect the differing time periods and income levels on short notice.

"While any short-term extension is bound to create some administrative complications, it is feasible to implement the bipartisan Senate bill," said a Treasury Department statement. "Any such complications will be outweighed by the economic benefits of ensuring that taxes do not go up on 160 million Americans starting on January 1st."

The annual "fix" to Medicare fees has lapsed many times before.

Medicare announced Tuesday that, as it has in the past when doctors' reimbursements have been cut through congressional inaction, it would withhold physician payments for two weeks in January to avoid passing on a 27 percent cut in Medicare fees. The hope is that the problem gets fixed by then.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Economics 101

Intro to economics. But fun.

View Course »

Introduction to Preferred Shares

Learn the difference between preferred and common shares.

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

What is IRS Form 8379: Injured Spouse Allocation

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has the power to seize income tax refunds when a taxpayer owes certain debts, such as unpaid taxes or overdue child support. Sometimes, a married couple's joint tax refund will be seized because of a debt for which only one spouse is responsible. When that happens, the other spouse is said to be "injured" and can file Form 8379 to get at least some of the refund.

What are 1095 Tax Forms for Health Care?

The Affordable Health Care Act, also known as Obamacare, introduced three new tax forms relevant to individuals, employers and health insurance providers. They are forms 1095-A, 1095-B and 1095-C. These forms help determine if you need to comply with the new shared responsibility payment, the fee you might have to pay if you don't have health insurance. For individuals who bought insurance through the health care marketplace, this information will help to determine whether you are able to receive an additional premium tax credit or have to pay some back.

A Tax Guide for Solopreneurs: Self-Employed Tax Tips

Flying solo can be the ultimate business adventure. When you run your own business and you're the only employee, you truly hold all the cards and earn the freedom to achieve your ideal work-life balance. Working for yourself also brings tax advantages not available to those who work for others. It's important to understand the tax rules that apply to the self-employed to profit the most from these.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

honestly, 20 a week, 80 a month 160 for two months, that is going to make that much of a difference in your life? if money is not paid in you get less when you retire. do you need the 160 now or will you need the 160 when you are 62? gotta have it now is over. billionaires and millionairs, giveaways,and entitlements, blah, blah, blah. lobbing grenades at each other will never work. personally I am happy when the obamas are on vacation and this year it is like a personal gift to me at christmas. ALL presidents vacation and ALL presidents take heat for it , leave obama alone. yes I am a republican, or as I am, a fiscal conservative.

December 23 2011 at 7:45 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

I applaud the House's action. A two month extension? We pay the President and Senators salaries to come up with a two months extension? Two Months! That's all these jerks could agree on? The extension should have been for 12 months at least.

December 21 2011 at 8:00 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to snof41's comment

I also applaud their action...The Repuplicans are going to take the heat, as the media will see to that......but the Democratic Senate are really to blame, just more of Harry Ried's bad politics....2 months is a joke.....the truth is they want to ba able to SLAM the American public immediately, should they retain the White House.....they suck

December 21 2011 at 12:06 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

What we are seeing in Congress proves we must have a president of a different party. There MUST be check and balance as our forefathers envisioned or can you imagine what we would be suffering today if the teaparty got their way on all their wants!!!! Maybe they don't have sr. parents and are all so rich that medical care costs don't matter.

December 21 2011 at 7:37 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Adrienne's comment

we need a new congress Adrienne......they are the problem....too much power in the Senate leaders hand, as well as the House speaker.....blame Nevada, as they had a chance to get rid of Reid, but they blew it

December 21 2011 at 12:08 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Is Obaba saying 2 months break is better than 12 months ???
So he really did go to Harvard---

December 21 2011 at 7:30 AM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply

Let's step back for a moment; Social Security and its survival has been the war cry for the Democrats forever, BUT, they insist on cutting the payroll tax – that funds ...you guessed it...Social Security (SS) - WTFO. But in reality cutting the payroll tax is the only tax cut that actually helps the lower class folks. The Bush-era tax cuts, that are the Republicans' holy grail, are drastically skewed to favor (increase wealth) of the upper echelon. The rich cap out on their SS contributions within a week, maybe two months into the tax year and thus reap little or no benefit in the payroll tax reduction, thus the continued insistence by republicans that bush-era tax relief stays in place to make sure those millionaires can have houses with more bedrooms than relatives, yachts, and.... etc.

December 21 2011 at 1:05 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

bottom line here is that BONER agrred to the deal and now has gone back on his word....imagine that a politician who is dishonest! also they will not be hurting themselves, they are all multi millionaires so they really don't care and we keep electing them...

December 21 2011 at 12:51 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Meanwhile Michelle is spending our money on the Hawaii trip. Giving the local democrat economy a boost on our dime;

December 20 2011 at 11:15 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Good for them. Bless their pointy little heads, they just want us to be more responsible as citizens and pay our fair share. Only a Communist or a terrorist would be for an earned income tax credit, it is certainly one of the most unfair burdens ever placed upon the fabric of this very nation.

December 20 2011 at 10:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply



December 20 2011 at 10:04 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

This is so sad. We elected this people to represent us in congress and the senate and they play chicken politics with the lives of millions. We can blame Bush or we can blame Obama and we will all be correct. These people can afford to be cavalier - it does not affect them. We need to insist that they vote on each proposal independent of others so we can see what they stand for and for whom they are really working.
We also need to insist that they get the same benefits the rest of us get and not get special retirement or health benefits. What made this country so great is positive thinking, not hate. Let’s force the Yoyos in Washington to do what we sent them there to do , or replace them.

December 20 2011 at 9:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply