AT&T's (NYS: T) all-consuming ambition to acquire T-Mobile may have blinded it to the changes taking place in the mobile communications landscape. While the No. 2 wireless carrier was amassing a legion of lobbyists to lubricate the approval of its merger with No. 4 carrier T-Mobile, No. 1 carrier Verizon (NYS: VZ) was building its 4G network and hammering out a wireless spectrum deal that would eclipse AT&T's proposal in impact, if not in expense.
Verizon's recent $3.6 billion arrangement with cable companies Comcast (NAS: CMCSA) , Time Warner Cable (NYS: TWC) , and Bright House Networks buys it enough spectrum to dominate AT&T in seven of the eight largest wireless markets in the country.
AT&T's $39 billion proposal so far has brought the company nothing but headaches:
- An antitrust lawsuit brought against it by the Department of Justice.
- A report released by the Federal Communications Commission rebutting every major claim made by AT&T.
- A $4 billion break-up fee payable to Deutsche Telekom, T-Mobile's parent company, if the deal falls through.
Wait, what's that sound?
In the meantime, other companies -- some AT&T may not have even considered threats a year ago -- have been moving into AT&T's territory.
DISH Network (NAS: DISH) , the satellite video company, has decided to get into the wireless biz. It plans on building a satellite/terrestrial LTE network to compete in the 4G marketplace. Microsoft (NAS: MSFT) bought Skype to get into the wireless voice-over-Internet business. And Facebook's free instant-messaging capability is in competition for the carrier's lucrative text-messaging service.
State of the non-union
AT&T, perhaps sensing the futility of fighting both government agencies, has abruptly changed its mind about wanting an expedited trial. Last Friday, the company asked Judge Ellen S. Huvelle to continue with the planned February antitrust suit court date and not go along with a DOJ request for a postponement. But yesterday, AT&T released a statement saying both it and T-Mobile wished to postpone the proceedings to "evaluate all options ... We are actively considering whether and how to revise our current transaction to achieve the necessary regulatory approvals."
Judge Huvelle readily agreed with AT&T and the Department of Justice, canceling the February trial, and setting a Jan. 18 hearing to decide the future of the case.
Unlike Sprint Nextel (NYS: S) , which vehemently opposed the AT&T/T-Mobile merger, Verizon did not speak out against it. In fact, last spring when the deal was announced, the company's reaction was surprisingly apathetic. Verizon's CEO Dan Mead even said, "I'm not concerned about it."
Verizon was indifferent, perhaps, because it was perfectly content to watch AT&T waste its resources trying to pull off a deal so audacious even its legendary lobbying army couldn't grease it through Washington.
In the end, I don't think the AT&T-Rex will fall into a tar pit and become a future petroleum product. But I do believe it will have to pull back from its ill-advised proposal and reassess what it needs to do to stay close to its main rival, the "unconcerned" Verizon.
There are some winning companies out there taking care of business with the explosion in smartphones and tablets. Learn about them in this report from The Motley Fool: "3 Hidden Winners of the iPhone, iPad, and Android Revolution." It's free!
At the time this article was published Fool contributor Dan Radovsky owns shares of AT&T. The Motley Fool owns shares of Microsoft. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Microsoft. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended creating a bull call spread position in Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2011 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.