Netflix (NAS: NFLX) shares plunged as much as 7.5% overnight. The company is raising $400 million of fresh capital, half in stock sales and half in zero-coupon notes.

Bearish analysts immediately pounced on the deal. Wedbush Morgan worries about "deteriorating performance" causing damage to Netflix's liquidity. The firm lowered its Netflix price target to $45 per share. Caris looks at the two-part deal and sees evidence that "subscriber growth, and hence revenue growth, were not strong enough in either the current quarter, nor in the first half of F2012 to cover" the cost of ambitious content deals.

The capital deals were announced in dry-as-sawdust SEC filings, so I reached out to Netflix spokesman Steve Swasey for some color commentary. "We don't think we need the money, but it's nice to have more money than you need," he said. There are no immediate plans to put the money to work, and no cash-crunching liquidity crisis. And the capital comes from "two long-term-oriented partners," T. Rowe Price (NAS: TROW) and Technology Crossover Ventures, who see value in grabbing million-unit chunks of Netflix stock at today's prices.

In fact, the notes that TCV are buying only convert into shares at $85.50, which is a premium to current share prices. The venture capitalist is betting that the stock will rise above that level. Price is buying shares at $70 a pop, hoping to unload them at higher prices. If that happens, today's dilution might be forgiven. After all, share prices would obviously be up again.

Good riddance to buybacks
That said, it's not all gumdrops and lemonade. If the convertible bonds all get turned into shares, the combined deal adds about 5 million new shares to the total share count, or 10% dilution. And in effect, all of the money eventually comes out of the pockets of us common shareholders. Who else would buy the new shares down the road to make the whole transaction worth TCV's and Price's while?

Not the most shareholder-friendly policy, folks. Netflix could have grabbed about the same amount of extra cash by simply not buying back shares over the last two years. So the company bought high and sells low. Oh, dear.

But I'm flogging a deceased pony here. The buyback policy is gone at long last, and I hope it ain't coming back until the high-growth era has passed.

You say it did already? Sorry, but one customer-losing quarter does not make a trend. If so, Netflix would have stopped growing when Blockbuster launched its unsustainable Total Access assault way back in 2006. Netflix lost some customers then, but it gained them all back and then some as Blockbuster's strategy backfired.

This time, the subscriber losses are Netflix's own doing but just as short-term in nature. In the latest earnings report, CEO Reed Hastings predicted that defections would slow down in November and turn into another round of heady growth in December. The prospectus filing for the stock sale confirms that Netflix is on track to do exactly that.

What's good for one goose may be wrong for another
In my eyes, raising debt to support outsized growth is a perfectly valid strategy. If you disagree, feel free to sell your Netflix shares and buy some Buffalo Wild Wings (NAS: BWLD) instead. The sports-bar chain has chosen to grow at more modest speeds, leaving long-term debt as zero and stock sales very modest indeed.

This works in a mature industry like quick-serve restaurants, and I do love B-Dub's low-risk growth strategy. But Netflix is too busy defining a new industry to slow down and look at the scenery. Stop growing for too long, and Blockbuster could wrest back control of the new video-rental market with capital from corporate parent DISH Network (NAS: DISH) . Or perhaps Coinstar (NAS: CSTR) would have time to roll out a tremendous Redbox-branded service while Netflix isn't shouting its brand from the rooftops. Apple (NAS: AAPL) is always a credible threat in any digital-media market, and maybe even Comcast (NAS: CMCSA) could figure out how to beat Netflix at its own game.

This is why high long-term growth is so important for Netflix. By hook, crook, or somewhat icky capital grabs, the company must keep growing until the gold-rush land grab is done. Only then can Netflix afford to slow down, collect profits, and buy back shares.

That time is still years away, and that's why I'm OK with the company's raising capital today. Netflix remains a screaming buy.

Digital video will help networking stocks, too. The Fool's top analysts sat down to compile a report on the best stock for 2011 and came up with an infrastructure play you've probably never heard of. Yet this company rides the rising video traffic just as directly as Netflix itself. The report is totally free and has been updated to keep up with the changing times. Get your copy right now -- it's free for Fools.

At the time this article was published Fool contributor Anders Bylund owns shares of Netflix but holds no other position in any of the companies mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Buffalo Wild Wings, and T. Rowe Price. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Apple, Coinstar, Buffalo Wild Wings, and Netflix, and have also recommended creating a bull call spread position in Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinion, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Check out Anders' holdings and bio, or follow him on Twitter and Google+. We have a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2011 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Basics of Diversification

Learn one of the fundamental concepts of building a portfolio.

View Course »

Finding Stock Ideas

Learn to do your research and find investments.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

1 Comment

Filter by:
golfer208

And you believe the company that it has no cash crunch? Dilute the stock at a new year low, just because its good to have a little extra cash? Projected losses for the entire 2012 year, not just a quarter. $4 billion in committed obligations and debt vs. a market cap of $3.5 billion? Shrinking sub base and lower arpu as they go to $8 streaming only, yet content costs are going through the roof. Losing money in every market it expands to. What flavor kool-aid are you drinking?

November 23 2011 at 9:01 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply