- Days left

Michele Bachmann Proposes Tax Hikes for Everyone -- Reagan Style

×
Michele Bachmann Proposes Tax Hikes for Everyone -- Reagan Style On Thursday morning, presidential candidate Michele Bachmann may have inadvertently made one of the boldest moves of the 2012 GOP primary campaign. Speaking on Fox News, the Minnesota congresswoman stated that she wants to adopt Ronald Reagan's tax plan, a rate structure that is much higher than current tax rates.

Criticizing Herman Cain's catchy-sounding 9-9-9 tax plan, Bachmann offered her own economic proposal, which she emphasizes has "not only a tax plan in it, but has a jobs and economic recovery plan." After sending viewers to her website, she explained the inspiration for her proposal: "For my tax plan, I take a page out of one of my great economists that I admire, Ronald Reagan. And under my tax plan, I want to adopt the Reagan tax plan. It brought the economic miracle of the 1980s." A few moments later, she reiterated her point, emphasizing, "I want to re-institute the Reagan tax model from the 1980s."



Within hours, Talking Points Memo and other media outlets across the country were reporting her apparent break with the Republican mainstream on taxes. The Bachmann campaign has not replied to repeated requests for clarification.

It's not hard to understand why Bachmann repeatedly invoked the Gipper: Among contemporary Republicans, Reagan's massive 1981 tax cut is legendary. When he came into office, the top tax rate of 70% kicked in at $108,300 and the median household paid 34%. Within a year, he had dropped taxes sharply: The top rate -- which fell on people who made $41,500 or more -- was down to 50%, and the tax rate paid by median households had dropped to 31%. By the end of the Reagan presidency, the wealthiest taxpayers and median households were paying the same rate: 28%.

But while Reagan's tax initiatives have gained near-totemic power among conservatives, the truth is that most taxpayers now pay even less than they did in the eighties. A single payer making the median household income of $49,445 pays 25%, and a payer in the highest tax bracket -- which kicks in at $373,650 -- pays 35%. On the surface, Bachmann's proposal to revert to the Reagan-era tax code would translate into a 3% to 9% tax increase on median households, while the richest taxpayers would face a tax change ranging from a 7% drop to a 35% rise.

The Big Picture: Even The Rich Would Pay More

But the basic tax rate only tells half the story. While cutting income tax, Reagan also raised taxes by closing loopholes and ending many tax breaks; for that matter, he increased levies on many consumer products, including gasoline and cigarettes.
To get a more complete picture of the tax structure, both under Reagan and in our own time, it's helpful to look at the total effective tax rate, a measure of the complete tax levy on most taxpayers.

Through this lens, Bachmann's tax boosting proposal seems even more impressive. During the Reagan years, the total effective tax rate ranged from 29.2% to 30.7%. By comparison, today's rate is 27.7%. In other words, depending upon which year of Reagan's presidency one considers, Bachmann's proposal would raise taxes by between 1.5% and 3%, across the board.

Bruce Watson is a senior features writer for DailyFinance. You can reach him by e-mail at bruce.watson@teamaol.com, or follow him on Twitter at @bruce1971.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Banking Services 101

Understand your bank's services, and how to get the most from them

View Course »

Economics 101

Intro to economics. But fun.

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

Employer Sponsored Health Coverage Explained

The Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, is simpler than some people may give it credit for. The basic rule to remember is that everyone must carry Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) or pay a penalty. Employers with 50 full-time employees or more are obligated to sponsor plans for their workers to help them meet this requirement.

How to Report RSUs or Stock Grants on Your Tax Return

Restricted stock units (RSUs) and stock grants are often used by companies to reward their employees with an investment in the company rather than with cash. As the name implies, RSUs have rules as to when they can be sold. Stock grants often carry restrictions as well. How your stock grant is delivered to you, and whether or not it is vested, are the key factors when determining tax treatment.

What is a Schedule Q Form?

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has two very different forms that go by the name Schedule Q. One of them is for people who participate in certain real estate investments; this is known as a Form 1066 Schedule Q. The other Schedule Q deals with employer benefit plans. It?s not something an individual taxpayer would normally have to deal with, though a small business owner might need it.

Incentive Stock Options

Some employers use Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) as a way to attract and retain employees. While ISOs can offer a valuable opportunity to participate in your company's growth and profits, there are tax implications you should be aware of. We'll help you understand ISOs and fill you in on important timetables that affect your tax liability, so you can optimize the value of your ISOs.