The electric vehicle revolution is supposed to be taking place in front of our eyes. Ford (NYS: F) , General Motors (NYS: GM) , and Nissan are just a few of the companies that either have launched electric cars or are planning to soon. But the EV industry is still miniscule and not all carmakers are having success selling the few vehicles they do make.

The Chevy Volt in particular has struggled recently. The car's ability to use electricity for short trips and gas for long ones was supposed to give the car more mass-market appeal. But after 302 Volts sold in August, versus 1,362 of the all-electric Nissan Leaf, the car is already in trouble.

It may be a vote of no confidence in Chevy or it could be part of a larger picture that buyers just aren't ready for an "every man" electric vehicle.

Sell to those with the money to buy
One of the issues is that buying an electric vehicle isn't like buying a regular car. Unless you want to count your charge time in days, you'll need to have a high-voltage car charger installed at home. Unless you buy a plug-in hybrid, you're also going to need another vehicle for longer trips, and these vehicles still aren't comparable price-wise with a traditional car.

So in this tough economic environment, how can Chevy possibly expect to sell a significant number of vehicles to the typical Chevy buyer? They just don't have the money.

The people who do have money to have an extra vehicle are those spending $50,000 plus on a car, and they want something different. What the cutting-edge EV buyers want is sex appeal in their tree-hugging vehicle.

At the high end of the EV market, Tesla Motors (NAS: TSLA) has already accumulated more than 5,300 reservations for its Model S sedan that's nearly a year away from delivery. Fisker Automotive, a maker of high-end plug-in hybrid cars, reportedly has about 3,000 Karmas on backlog. When you compare this with the paltry numbers for Chevy and Nissan, which should have wider appeal, you can see that the high end is where EVs belong right now.

How not to invest in EVs
With the high end of the EV market looking strong and the low end looking extremely weak, how should investors be investing right now?

I would avoid companies that cater to buyers that aren't at the top end of the passenger-vehicle market. I expect Chevy, Nissan, Ford, and any of the other mass-market auto manufacturers to post disappointing sales of EVs for now. The average buyer just doesn't have the money to make the investment necessary. And the buyers that do have the money aren't looking for an EV with a blue oval or a Chevy symbol on it.

Of course, these companies are much larger than their electric vehicles, but this should at least factor into the equation.

Investing in EVs
I still argue that the best way to invest in EVs right now is by buying companies that build the infrastructure. AeroVironment (NAS: AVAV) and General Electric (NYS: GE) are making chargers that can not only go in your home, but will be fueling EV stations on the road as well. As this infrastructure is built out, we may start to see EVs become an economically viable purchase for more drivers, but we're still far from that right now.

Battery makers can also offer exposure to commercial electric vehicles, a market that's growing as companies like United Parcel Service (NYS: UPS) and PepsiCo buy electric delivery trucks. A123 Systems (NAS: AONE) is still a very risky stock, but the company has built a large list of clients in passenger vehicles, commercial vehicles, and grid storage solutions. The company currently has too much capacity and is reporting large losses, but fortunes could turn quickly as its end markets ramp up demand.

But the best pure play may be Tesla. The company makes cars that have experienced strong demand and is becoming a supplier to manufacturers like Toyota. Profit is still a long ways off, so the company's operations require a bit of a leap of faith.

Foolish bottom line
Being on the cutting edge of EVs manufacturing may seem like a nice idea for GM, Ford, and Nissan but evidence shows that the mass-market just isn't ready for prime time. High-end buyers will lead the EV charge until costs come down and a national charging infrastructure is built. I would like to say that I see more hope for EVs than just a small market, but that's what the evidence shows.

Interested in reading more about EVs? Add your favorite EV stock to My Watchlist, and My Watchlist will find all of our Foolish analysis on this stock.

At the time this article was published Fool contributor Travis Hoium does not have a position in any company mentioned. You can follow Travis on Twitter at @FlushDrawFool, check out his personal stock holdings or follow his CAPS picks at TMFFlushDraw.The Motley Fool owns shares of Ford Motor and United Parcel Service. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of General Motors, Ford Motor, and AeroVironment. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2011 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Socially Responsible Investing

Invest in companies with a conscience.

View Course »

Introduction to Preferred Shares

Learn the difference between preferred and common shares.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

4 Comments

Filter by:
philblock

"Beautiful hypothesis killed by an ugly fact." The ugly fact--there ain't no rechargeable battery on the market that can power a practical rechargeable battery electric motor driven car.. Sure, stick an ICE/Generator system under the seat to recharge when the battery runs down. Then, what do you have--of course--a hybred? If such a battery were available, and I lam talking about a battery that would not require an 18 wheeler running behind the car carrying it, people of all persuasions all over the world would be building electric cars (me too-anEE). Beauty is only skin deep--it is what is under it that matters--humans as well as autos. Nickoli Tesla, whom I assume the auto company was named after, pulled all sorts of scams on the ignorant public about a mysterious power to power an electric motor driven auto. Check the net for some great history on the subject. It's strange how history keeps repeating itself.

September 16 2011 at 9:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
thephenx

The larger reasons the Tesla Model S and FIsker's are outselling has more to do with and "everyman" ride vs a high end car. Look at the styling for one thing... the volt is god awful compared to the original concept car, and the nissan leaf has to be one of the ugliest vehicles I have ever seen. 2nd look at the range. The Tesla will have over 3x the range of the leaf, there is a big difference in a vehicle that goes 100 miles max and one that goes 300... The FIsker and Tesla are FAR superior in every way. The Chevy and Nissan were outdated before they were released and rushed to market to try and compete.

September 15 2011 at 10:46 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
philblock

Just what is a high voltage charger? Sounds like another gimick to con the public. The rechargeable battery electric car is a toy. GM , Ford, etc. all know it and only build them to keep the politicians and the eviro wackoes off their backs. Fuel Cell cars. Yes! Hydrogen stations. Yes! Then you have an electric car that acts like an ICE and CAN COMPETE with the ICE. Fuel Cell cars with reformers that can use ethanol, natural gas, propane, coal gas, etc, --Yes! The money to develop a practical battery car is being wasted--and every electrical engineer knows it and will honestly admit it.( except those that have their finger in the pie). The laws of electrochemistry cannot be broken--the electrochemistry to build a battery for a practical electric car does not exist. The Achilles heel-the rechargeable battery--can be overcome with the Fuel Cell--and GM, Ford, ect. all know it-- so does Tesla. Soo-- let's tell the politicans and the wackoes to go stick their fingers in an outlet and let's get on with the development of an electric car that has proven itself and will help solve many of our polution problems.

September 15 2011 at 7:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jesse

"Unless you want to count your charge time in days, you'll need to have a high-voltage car charger installed at home."

That's just not true. I commute about 40 miles a day in a Leaf (in 100+ degree heat), and I'm just using the 120V plug in charger (aka, Trickle charger) that came with the car. I've never come out to my car in the morning to find my car with less than a full charge.

The need for high-voltage car chargers is vastly over-hyped.

September 15 2011 at 4:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply