cutting up a Benjamin.By Alex Dumortier, The Motley Fool

On Monday, ratings agency Standard & Poor's announced that it was downgrading its outlook for the U.S.' sovereign credit rating from stable to negative, and put the odds of a ratings downgrade within the next two years at 1 in 3. The news spooked stock investors.

What's the significance of this announcement? I asked two of my Foolish colleagues, Morgan Housel and Matt Koppenheffer, to weigh in on the following question:

Will the U.S. Lose Its AAA Rating?

Morgan Housel: It shouldn't, because it doesn't have to. Our debt problems are massive, but still very solvable. I also think most people underestimate this country's ability to pull it together and act when it becomes truly imperative. You see this during wars, terrorist attacks, financial crises, etc. Parties hold hands and get it done when things get really ugly. Congress won't act today because there's no crisis -- the Treasury can borrow debt at a lower interest rate today than it could when there was a budget surplus 10 years ago. When interest rates spike and a true crisis stares us in the face, I think you'll see quick action. Maybe that's being naive, but I imagine it's how this story will play out.

That said, downgrading America's debt isn't up to Congress or the president. It's up to the ratings agencies. Not only do the raters have an abysmal track record, but I worry about this on an egotistical level. The person responsible for downgrading the U.S. will overnight become the most famous analyst on the planet. Knowing the personality of people who go into high finance, I can't help but wonder if this will be a driving factor. That might sound conspiratorial, but it's what happens when two firms (Moody's and S&P) hold duopoly power over the nation's debt ratings. You get despots.

As for actual default, history shows the best indicator of future default is simply past default. The U.S. hasn't defaulted on its debt in modern history, so we're doing well there. We've shown the willingness to make tough decisions during past bouts of debt overload, particularly after World War II and in the early '90s. The bond market has a good memory of this stuff, as it should. As I wrote last week, the market will forever be kinder to Ford (F) than it will General Motors(GM) , only because the former made tough choices while the latter dug its own grave. There's a similar analogy in there when comparing the U.S. to countries like, say, Greece.

Matt Koppenheffer: Earlier this week I spoke pretty confidently that the 1-in-3 odds that Standard & Poor's put on the U.S. losing its AAA credit rating was silly. To be fair, I hold none of the cards in that game and S&P holds them all -- so if the folks there want to downgrade the U.S., then, by God, they will.

The bigger question though, may be if anyone really gives a rat's hindquarters whether S&P goes ahead with a downgrade. In the fallout from the financial crisis, S&P, Moody's (MCO) , and Fitch have bent over backward to be clear that their ratings are just opinions and they can get things very wrong (ya think?). While the stock market sold off in the wake of the outlook knock, the bond market charged right ahead, apparently flipping S&P the bird as investors continued gobbling up low-yielding Treasuries.

In the end I can't say whether the S&P will downgrade the U.S. I can say that I don't think it should -- there's an exceedingly low likelihood that the U.S. won't make good on its debts and there's no reason that it shouldn't be among the top tier of borrowers. What that doesn't mean, however, is that Treasuries are good investments. With yields at ridiculous lows and specter of inflation far from nonexistent, I think Bill Gross has the right idea.

Alex Dumortier: Although the stock market reacted sharply to the news, the bond market took it in stride. By the end of the day, the yield on the 30-year Treasury bond had increased all of 3 basis points to 3.39% (1 basis point = 1 hundredth of a percentage point.) Frankly, I'm surprised equity investors were selling stocks on the announcement, which was long overdue. It's not exactly a surprise that the U.S. can't afford to stay on its current fiscal trajectory. As long as the government does not address the issue in a coherent, forceful manner, the outlook for the U.S.' credit rating can't be anything other than negative.

Will the U.S. lose its AAA rating? I think the odds of that happening are pretty slim (but not zero), and certainly less than S&P's estimate. The budget deficit and national debt are now center stage as political issues, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. These problems are far from intractable, but the solutions are unpopular (something politicians abhor). Nevertheless, S&P's decision heaps a little extra pressure on the politicos to act with purpose rather than simply trying to score political points.

My biggest fear is that any resolve will be channeled into inflating the problem away. Under that scenario, default risk is not the issue; the problem is getting repaid in dollars with a much reduced purchasing power. As Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) CEO Warren Buffett said at the end of March:

I would recommend against buying long-term fixed-dollar investments. If you ask me if the U.S. dollar is going to hold its purchasing power fully at the level of 2011, 5 years, 10 years or 20 years from now, I would tell you it will not.

Owners of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) , you've been warned!

It's your turn: Give us your opinion in the comments section below. Alternatively, if you want to explore this topic further, Morgan Housel answers the $14 trillion dollar question: Will the U.S. default on its debt?

This roundtable article was compiled by Fool contributor Alex Dumortier, CFA, who has no beneficial interest in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. Berkshire Hathaway and General Motors are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. Berkshire Hathaway, Ford Motor, and Moody's are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Ford Motor, and Moody's. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.



More on The Motley Fool:

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Reading a Stock Quote

Learn to read the ingredients of a stock.

View Course »

Income Investing

Grow your nest-egg.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

14 Comments

Filter by:
Dereck

Major Fraud Alert


The entire Federal Banking System under FirstGov has been "Consumed" and "Levied" by way of a Maryland State Circuit/District Court Ruled “Appropriation and Garnishment” of all Future Earnings prior to and after 2004 against Bank Of America by way of the F.D.I.C. Regulations Prohibiting failing Banks from Merging with other failing Banks between the Dates of 08/04/08 and 10/09/09.

Bank of America violated the 21st Century Act: Final Amendments to Regulation CC Section: http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/press/bcreg/2004/20040726/attachment.pdf

seeking reimbursement of Credit, Loan, and Finance Balances as a "Bank Entity" and not a "Nonbank Consumer" as specified on Pages 85 and 86.

The person they sued through a LLC. Debt Collection Company and Law Firm was the "World Fortune Owner" who "Counterclaimed" and won.

Now all Contracts of any Corporations (Including Employment) under the "Controlling Interest" of any Investment Bank Worldwide are "Null and Void", and are also under the stipulated Rules and Regulations of an "Closely-held S Corporation rendering all Employed under Legal Actions against “Domination”, and also means that "No Corporation can hold Shares" officially making every Stock Exchange on the Planet a "Ponzi Scheme" by default.

Businesses owned by the States (Public Corporations) are being sold Stock Shares by Corporations also under the Federal Banking System in this Worldwide "Ponzi Scheme". The World Fortune Company Merrick Inc. Sweden is dissolving Millions and Billions of Dollars from "All Levels of Government"in the U.S. of Financing based upon Years of "negligent inaction" involving this case.

The Federal Government has already been forced to discontinue supplying the Financing States use to pay their debts, Persons in Government Offices may want to begin to take their jobs more seriously, these are different times from 10 Years ago and you will not be accepted civil servants here just because you say you are here to do the right thing.

May 29 2011 at 12:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Samir semaan

What I can say about the standard and poor and its rating which is one of the hypocrisy because these are the same people that caused the financial market to tumble down and they destroy the american economy 3 years ago. Now they can speak about rating what the president needs to do is to dock all those crooks in jail and start raising the interest rate so there will be enough dollars in the united states and the country will be on the way to recovery. The united states must be the only entitity that will protect and give the rating as I said before the need for anticorruption office in the FBI to see who is stealing the american taxpayers from medicare to medicaid to social services that alone can lower the deficit 3 thrillion and one has to look at the defence budget after the end of wars facing the nation. Remember market is supply and demand and nothing can move forward unless there is demand and jobs start from here the administration must eliminate outsoursing.

April 22 2011 at 10:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
scottee

if you were a trillion dollars in debt, how would your credit rating be?

April 20 2011 at 3:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to scottee's comment
inasctg56

If I was a trillion in debt and the secretary of defense handed me almost a half a trillion in defense cuts - I'd take it. I'd also get rid of the upper 2% tax cuts and I wouldn't be planning on $4 trillion more in upper tax cuts like the gop is doing. Wrong direction and same old failed gop policies.

Obama does have $400 billion in defense cuts.

April 20 2011 at 4:26 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
inasctg56

MIKE: Moody's did not downgrade. Standard and poor did not downgrade - yet. It was a warning to politicians to approve the debt ceiling and come up with a serious 10-12 year budget. Obama's budget includes $400 billion in defense cuts given by the secretary of defense. Ryan's budget? Zero defense cuts. But does include tax cuts for millionaires. This is what they did under Bush and at that time they were told by economists not to do it that it would add to the debt - yet here we go again - same old gop failed policies.

April 20 2011 at 2:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to inasctg56's comment
marycmamm

The people at S&P giving these pronouncements should be in jail for the role they played in the financial crisis, not giving ratings and financial advice. They are useless.

April 20 2011 at 1:22 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply