InvestorCenter

Fed Rejects Bank of America Dividend Hike Plan

Bank of AmericaBank of America (BAC) said Wednesday the Federal Reserve has objected to its plan for raising its dividend in the second half of this year, a setback that suggests regulators need to see more evidence that the nation's largest bank is strong enough to weather another recession.

But the bank said in a regulatory filing that it's been given another opportunity to submit a comprehensive plan to the Fed so that the central bank may reconsider its decision. The Charlotte, N.C., bank expects to resubmit a request to dole out a higher second-half dividend.

The bank has paid a penny-per-share quarterly dividend for the last two years. Its last dividend was a penny a share, declared in January and payable on Friday. The dividend peaked at 64 cents in mid-2008 before being halved to 32 cents later that year.

Bank of America shares fell 23 cents, or 1.7 percent, to $13.65 in pre-market trading.

Last week, the Fed cleared the way for major lenders to increase their dividends if they passed "stress tests" to see if they are strong enough to stand up to another economic downturn. Banks had been forced to cut dividends to preserve cash following the financial crisis that peaked in late 2008. It was a condition of the government's bank bailout package.

The Fed said at the time it expects that "some" banks will increase or resume dividend payments, buy back shares or repay government capital, but it didn't reveal the names or number of banks that are expected to do so.

All of the 19 largest banks overseen by the Fed were subject to the tests. By increasing dividend payments, banks may be able to attract new investors, which should lead to more lending. The Fed has said it is taking a "measured and conservative approach" on banks' dividend requests.

The Fed also cleared investment bank Goldman Sachs to buy back all the preferred shares it issued to Berkshire Hathaway Inc., the conglomerate run by billionaire Warren Buffett. Other banks, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co. and U.S. Bancorp also announced large share repurchases.

Citigroup Inc. on Monday said it planned to reinstate a penny-per-share quarterly dividend and announced a reverse stock split, which will lift the company's stock price and allow more institutional investors to own it.

Investors have been worried that regulations enacted after the financial crisis will make it difficult for Bank of America to increase profits and grow many of its businesses, especially its credit and debit card business. The bank has warned that it would lose at least $2 billion in annual revenue for a few years in its card business.

Last year, in Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan's first year at the helm, its credit card unit took a $10.4 billion write-down due to new regulations, and its home loan business struggled with fallout from the implosion of the housing bubble. The bank reported a 2010 loss of $3.6 billion.

Learn about investing from the comfort of your own home.

Portfolio Basics

Take the first steps to building your portfolio.

View Course »

Investment Strategies

Learn the strategies you need to build a winning portfolio

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

12 Comments

Filter by:
ingr72

Shareholders and all businesses should be against our Govt telling our business people how and what to do.
I think there are probably enough smart people at B of A who felt raising the dividend at this time was something that should be done and can be handled by their bank financially. Isn't after all one of the responsibilities of company executives to see that they do the best for their shareholders.We the shareholders will let any company we own know what we think by buying or selling that companies shares ... That's the "American Way" !!!

March 24 2011 at 6:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TomKat@luckymail.com

I think it's about time to consider New Mangement . It's time to clean house !!!

March 24 2011 at 3:01 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to TomKat@luckymail.com's comment
PeekachewsRevenj

I agree. Let's get rid of this Congress, and get a new one. Preferably non-millionaires, that actually give a damn about the working class people.

March 24 2011 at 4:15 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
PeekachewsRevenj

What's the problem? Ben can just print them some more money, right?

March 24 2011 at 12:56 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
Robert Leonetti

for once i agree with the Fed. No damm dividends until the bank has several good years.

March 23 2011 at 1:56 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
nmbadlands

As a former shareholder, I am not surprised. I do feel the pain of existing shareholders and resent Fed direction of any publicly held company. However, the practices involving mortgage lending by BAC coupled with severa unsavory practices will not win BAC any friends in the courts, congress or the public. This is largely a self-inflicted wound. I personally ceased banking with them prior to eliminating my shares.

March 23 2011 at 1:32 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to nmbadlands's comment
Robert Leonetti

THE GIANT STOCK HOLDERS ARE PROBABLY THE ONES THAT ARE PUSHING FOR THIS DIVIDEND. THEY NEED TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE A SOLID BANK AGAIN BEFORE THEY START HANDING OUT LARGE DIVIDEND CHECKS

March 23 2011 at 1:58 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
richrdan

Last I looked BAC was a publicly held company. How would you feel if you had a business and government decided they should tell you how to run it? I would hope any shareholders of BAC (basically business owners) would protest this government involvement.

March 23 2011 at 12:21 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to richrdan's comment
jkennedy806

I would agree with you except that i believed that these risky POS banksters should have been let to tank -- The shareholders should have, at the get go, held these irresponsible risk taking morons accountable for the decision making and the poorly run bad management activities -- they should have told how to run it. But they didn't. They left it up to the government. Another poor choice - the only thing I agree with is the protest of government involvement when it came to bailing out the bankster goons.

March 23 2011 at 3:08 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
bhawkes328

ANOTHER RECESSION !!!!!! ? YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING

March 23 2011 at 11:05 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to bhawkes328's comment
jkennedy806

when did the first one end? did it? I've been poor since 2008

March 23 2011 at 3:03 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
donut999

at a penny a share, it is only a piddly 100 million dollars. could they pay less than a penny?

March 23 2011 at 9:11 AM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply