A Breakout Is Likely -- but in Which Direction?

A variety of technical signals are suggesting we're at a crucial decision point for the stock market: Either the bull recovers from its recent swoon and moves decisively up toward new highs, or the market reverses trend dramatically and moves down.

Although many market observers dismiss technical analysis as unscientific speculation more akin to astrology than math-based quantitative analysis, those skeptics are missing the point: Technical analysis isn't rooted in brute-force matching of curve sets, it's rooted in human psychology. Levels of resistance and support are not mathematical certainties -- they reflect the human psychological tendencies toward greed and fear.

When the market finally recovers a key level, for example, those investors who have grown weary of being underwater simply want their initial capital back, so they sell. This creates resistance. When the market declines, those who have reaped gains from buying during previous dips will jump in and buy more stock at what they perceive as "bargain" prices. This creates support.

And proponents of number-crunching quantitative analysis shouldn't be too cocky about their tool of choice: Quant analysis is based on past price action and patterns just like technical analysis. Just because a math-derived curve set matches recent price action does not preclude the unexpected from happening. This is why quant-based funds such as Long-Term Capital Management tend to self-destruct when markets trend strongly in unpredictable ways.

There are a lot of crosswinds in the market right now. Gains in retail sales and jobs are trends that support a bullish stance, while rising oil prices, food inflation and geopolitical uncertainty are giving credibility to a more cautious or even bearish perspective.

Warnings from Carl Icahn and Bill Gross


Small investors often look to highly successful "superstar" investors for hints on where the market is heading, and two recent news items about such big names have provided solid support for the bear camp: Legendary investor Carl Icahn has dissolved his hedge fund and is returning its capital to shareholders, citing the risk of another financial crisis. And famed bond manager Bill Gross has reduced the Treasury bond holdings of the world's largest bond fund, Pimco's Total Return Fund, to zero. The amount of cash the fund holds has swollen from $11 billion to more than $54 billion, its largest cash position ever.

There isn't any other way to interpret this except as a multibillion-dollar bet against the Federal Reserve's reassuring stance that inflation will remain tame for years to come. If you fear inflation might accelerate, the last investments you want to own are long-term, low-yield bonds that will instantly lose money if interest rates start rising.

Some analysts also interpret this move as an expression of doubt that the Fed will launch a massive third round of quantitative easing in June when the current QE2 campaign is scheduled to end. The Fed's ongoing $600 billion quantitative easing program is widely regarded as having strongly supported the rising equity markets.

As for the rising retail sales numbers, part of those "gains" can be attributed to rising costs: People and businesses are paying more than before for the same goods. If households are spending borrowed money again, that's not a sign of strength -- it's a sign of weakness in the household balance sheet. Consumers turned on the credit card spigot again in December, and they've loaded up on car loan debt this year.

What analysts should be looking at is whether household incomes are rising. Unfortunately, the answer is clear: Wage earners aren't benefiting much from the recent strong gains in productivity.

In an economy based on consumer spending, stagnant household incomes don't provide a strong foundation for future spending increases.

As for stock valuations, by at least one analyst's reckoning, many stocks are at all-time highs. Does the underlying economy support sky-high stock valuations? That's an open question, and one the market is obviously pondering.

To round out the backdrop for the market's current indecision, let's look at these two log-term charts of the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq.

The Nasdaq has retreated from the highs last reached in 2007, following a pattern that looks a lot like a classic "double top."




The S&P 500, meanwhile, traced out a massive double top pattern earlier in the decade. Its rapid ascent from the 2009 lows has been far more robust than the recovery in the overall economy, a disconnect that the current market queasiness reflects.



Now let's look at the daily chart of the broad-based S&P 500 (SPX).



The push and pull of hope and doubt is visible in the wedge (also called a flag or pennant) that has been traced out over the past three weeks. This is a classic wedge of lower highs and higher lows as prices are squeezed into a narrowing band of volatile swings.

Wedges are typically broken by big moves either up or down. A collapse in oil prices or a strong jobs report might provide the catalyst for an upside breakout, while accelerating inflation, a further rise in oil prices or a weaker-than-anticipated jobs report might trigger a breakdown and a trend reversal.

The 1,300 level offers both a psychological and technical support -- a round number and the 50-day moving average. Any sustained break below 1,300 would signal a possible trend reversal.

The bull has stumbled recently. For it regain its footing, the market would need to climb above the 20-day moving average (MA) and then retest recent highs around 1,343.

The two-month chart of the Nasdaq offers an interesting technical snapshot of indecision: As fear that the rally is over takes hold, the market drops significantly. Then as "bargain-hunting" and hopefulness return, it moves back up to the 2,800 level. But then by day four or five, doubt returns with a vengeance, and the market plummets again only to retrace back up to the 2,800 zone of resistance a few days later.



Now that pattern is breaking down: Price has failed to climb back above the critical 20-day moving average even as it has turned down, and is now clinging precariously to the key 50-day moving average. A break through the 50-day MA would be technically significant.

Nobody knows what the market will do tomorrow, much less three months or three years from now. But to the degree that markets reflect the emotions and calculations of its human participants, the current indicators of doubt and indecision deserve careful watching.

Disclosure: The writer has a small position in ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID), an inverse ETF on the NASDAQ 100.

Learn about investing from the comfort of your own home.

Portfolio Basics

Take the first steps to building your portfolio.

View Course »

Investment Strategies

Learn the strategies you need to build a winning portfolio

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

127 Comments

Filter by:
Dereck

Major Fraud Alert


The entire Federal Banking System under FirstGov has been "Consumed" and "Levied" by way of a Maryland State Circuit/District Court Ruled “Appropriation and Garnishment” of all Future Earnings prior to and after 2004 against Bank Of America by way of the F.D.I.C. Regulations Prohibiting failing Banks from Merging with other failing Banks between the Dates of 08/04/08 and 10/09/09.

Bank of America violated the 21st Century Act: Final Amendments to Regulation CC Section: http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/press/bcreg/2004/20040726/attachment.pdf

seeking reimbursement of Credit, Loan, and Finance Balances as a "Bank Entity" and not a "Nonbank Consumer" as specified on Pages 85 and 86.

The person they sued through a LLC. Debt Collection Company and Law Firm was the "World Fortune Owner" who "Counterclaimed" and won.

Now all Contracts of any Corporations (Including Employment) under the "Controlling Interest" of any Investment Bank Worldwide are "Null and Void", and are also under the stipulated Rules and Regulations of an "Closely-held S Corporation rendering all Employed under Legal Actions against “Domination”, and also means that "No Corporation can hold Shares" officially making every Stock Exchange on the Planet a "Ponzi Scheme" by default.

Businesses owned by the States (Public Corporations) are being sold Stock Shares by Corporations also under the Federal Banking System in this Worldwide "Ponzi Scheme". The World Fortune Company Merrick Inc. Sweden is dissolving Millions and Billions of Dollars from "All Levels of Government"in the U.S. of Financing based upon Years of "negligent inaction" involving this case.

The Federal Government has already been forced to discontinue supplying the Financing States use to pay their debts, Persons in Government Offices may want to begin to take their jobs more seriously, these are different times from 10 Years ago and you will not be accepted civil servants here just because you say you are here to do the right thing.

May 29 2011 at 12:38 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
qiuxiangsdfd

welcome to our webiste below,FREE SHIPPING :
http://www.newflybuy.com ~~~~

Air jordan (1-24) shoes $33 ~~~~

UGG BOOT $50 ~~~~

Nike Shox (R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 ~~~~

Handbags (Coach ,LV ,Fendi ,D&G) $35 ~~~~

Tshirts (Polo ,ED Hardy,Lacoste) $16 ~~~~

Jean (True Religion,ED Hardy,Coogi) $30 ~~~~

Sunglasses (Oakey,Coach,Gucci,A rmaini) $16 ~~~~

New era cap $15 ~~~~

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25 ~~~~

FREE SHIPPING ~~~

http://www.newflybuy.com

Cheap shoes, clothing, bags, Exempt freight

March 13 2011 at 8:45 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
donut999

forget the charts. they are based on historical data. there was a time when they were useful, not anymore. it is a brave new world Alice. look at the world in 1980 or even 1990. does it look anything like it does now? are there even any proverbial 3rd world countries left? the combined economies of india and china were about 1/2 of the u.s. economy in 1980. now, they exceed it. we will #2 in another 10 or 15 years. hope we can hold on to the ranking. back to charts. forget the charts.

March 11 2011 at 11:43 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
fpfp040408

Sarah Palin thinks a "breakout " is a skin condition on the face involving pimples, and acne. She does not include blackheads because she thinks that is something else, but we won't go there.

March 11 2011 at 10:14 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to fpfp040408's comment
donut999

my favorite gop joke is a bush/katrina one. in the middle of a press conference, someone went off topic and asked him what he thought about Rowe vs Wade. he responded "i don't care how they get out of there, but they better get going"

March 11 2011 at 11:45 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Chuck Wright

What on earth are you talking about?? Are you that politically bias to bring in Palin on something this article has nothing to do with!!

March 11 2011 at 2:52 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
L R Adams

MA MA Send money.....

March 11 2011 at 9:14 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to L R Adams's comment
fpfp040408

typical republican

March 11 2011 at 10:06 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Ray

Dow down tomorrow 457 points
Oil uo 6.88 a barrel. LOL

March 10 2011 at 7:16 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
fpfp040408

No one can name me one Repub who is better than Palin, no one knows US History better, no one know the Supreme Court and its decisions better , no one reads as much as she does, no one but her is an ally of North Korea, no one can win the space race but her, no one can reload like her ( not even Todd ) , no one can place gun sights on maps like her, no one can write notes on ones palm like her, no one can see Russia from their porch, no one can kill a reindeer 2 weeks before Christmas with Daddy doing it, PALIN IS BY FAR THE BEST THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS TO OFFER ! plus Christine O'Donnell = Palin / O'Donnell 2012 !

See full article from DailyFinance: http://srph.it/fDNas4

March 10 2011 at 6:25 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to fpfp040408's comment
pmurph2000

Haven't heard Palin talk about ending the Federal Reserve, stopping foreign aid, or bringing our troops home. Now that would be real change. When she does, she'll get my support too!

March 11 2011 at 9:29 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
fpfp040408

pmurph = Palin does not know what the Federal Reserve is. She has though asked her North Korean ally if they could help with the war that she knows is somewhere

March 11 2011 at 10:08 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
fpfp040408

President OBAMA now has an approval rating of 56% OBAMA 2012

March 10 2011 at 6:22 PM Report abuse -7 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to fpfp040408's comment
qtxusa

fpfp040408.......independents are key for Obama. Have you seen the approval ratings for Obama among independents? 37% approval.

But, just watch....in about 6 months he'll go mainstream, open up drill/reserves, compromise on health care, etc, etc say anyhting to get another 4. This country's toast. People are not smart and go for style over substance.

March 10 2011 at 6:30 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
donut999

obama, mccain, palin, hilliary---just add the name of anyone you dislike--will all do any and everything necessary to be elected or re-elected. no argument with your point, but it is universal, not restricted to an individual or party.

March 11 2011 at 11:50 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
trblhnds

Which is worth more a US dollar or a sheet of Charmin ?

March 10 2011 at 6:15 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
fred

Gamble with money you can only afford to lose, whether it's the stock market or the casino. Otherwise rathole your money- the ride ain't over yet!!

March 10 2011 at 6:01 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply