Get the latest in savings. Like us on Facebook.

Which Lightbulbs Save the Most Money?

Posted 1:30PM 03/08/11 Savings Experiment, Home & Garden |
How to Save on Light BulbsWith high energy costs driving up electricity bills and an ever-widening array of lighting choices available at the local hardware store, it can be hard to pick the best -- and cheapest -- lighting option. In today's Savings Experiment, we'll explore the available lighting choices and pick the one that's best for you.

The first light bulbs -- and the ones that are used in most homes -- are incandescent bulbs. Basically, these bulbs follow Thomas Edison's original design: an electrical current runs through a filament in a glass bulb. The filament then heats up, emitting light, as well as a lot of heat.

In terms of base price, incandescent bulbs seem like the cheapest option: a four-pack costs somewhere between $2 and $3. But the cost goes up once you screw them into a lamp: incandescent bulbs use between 20 and 100 watts per hour, which translates into 2-12 kilowatts per month. Also, they don't last too long: most bulbs work for between 750 and 1,000 hours, or six to eight months, which means that they need to be replaced fairly often.

They are also the most convenient lighting option. Incandescent bulbs can be used with dimmer switches and are available in a wide variety of shapes and sizes, making them a perfect fit for almost any lighting design. They are easy to dispose of and, after more than 100 years of use, most of the bugs have been worked out.

However the move to more energy-efficient lighting means certain incandescent light bulbs are being phased over the next few years. As of January 1, 2012, the 100-watt incandescent light bulb will no longer be manufactured for use in the United States. On January 1, 2013, the production of 75-watt incandescent bulbs will cease to exist; and in 2014, 60-watt and 40-watt bulbs will be phased out, according to The National Electrical Manufacturers Association, a trade group for the lighting industry. (In California, each of these dates go into effect a year earlier).

The current lightbulb leaders are compact fluorescent lamps or CFLs. First developed in the early 1980's, CFLs didn't become really popular until the last few years. Part of the reason for this is cost: although their price has dropped in recent years, CFLs still run $2 and up per bulb, about four times as much as incandescent bulbs. On the other hand, CFLs also last a lot longer: most will run for between 6,000 and 10,000 hours, or four to seven years of normal use. In fact, given that they will run for six to ten times longer than incandescents, their basic price is up to 50% less than incandescent bulbs. And CFLs also use a lot less electricity: a 26-watt compact fluorescent puts out as much light as a 100-watt incandescent, but only uses about a quarter of the electricity.

CFLs also have their downside: depending upon the brand, they may flicker a bit, and they cannot be used with a traditional dimmer switch. Worst of all, they contain mercury, which can make disposal difficult: if they are thrown in a standard landfill, the mercury can leach into the groundwater, presenting an environmental hazard. However, as the curlicue bulbs grow more popular, more and more stores are offering on-site recycling.

The brightest option is probably light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs. A nine-watt LED bulb puts out as much light as a 40-watt incandescent, but will last for 25,000 hours. Depending upon usage, this can be up to 23 years. They also don't present the same mercury hazard as CFLs, which makes them easier to throw away. Then again, with 23 years of life, chances are that you'll throw away your lighting fixtures more often than you'll throw out your bulbs.

Unfortunately, LEDs are prohibitively expensive. They run about $40 apiece; most LED bulb makers are small companies with limited production runs. On the bright side, General Electric and Sylvania have both released LED bulbs. While the new lights will probably be expensive in the beginning, competition should bring prices down.

In the meantime, though, the basic choice is still between incandescents and CFLs. Over the course of seven years, the lifetime of a CFL, the bulb will use about $25 worth of energy; with the $2 initial price thrown in, this translates into a total cost of about $27. By comparison, an incandescent bulb will use about $96 worth of electricity in the same period of time. It also will need to be replaced about eight times, leading to an overall cost of more than $100 dollars. Given the costs and limitations, your best -- and brightest -- choice is a CFL.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

24 Comments

Filter by:
Justin

I bought a 10 of LED bulbs last year. And they have a nice bright light and good color. But they also get hot. That is why they have a metal base, and are heavy. It's a giant heatsink like a computer processor. Even though they say it should last 23 years, I doubt it. I bought 10 LED bulb for about $50-55 each. Out of those 10 led bulbs, 4 have died. I am now just waiting for the next 6 to go dead. Which is starting to seem like the norm for these bulbs.

LED bulbs are nice. But they have a long ways to go for longevity. If almost half are going to fail within the first year, they are not very good. They also should have a better warranty. Mine are warrantied only 30 days for manufacture defects, or craftsmanship.

February 12 2013 at 2:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
NateInPhoenix

My experience mirrors that of others here. The numbers they claim for longevity and efficiency are achieved in a lab with ideal conditions....moisture control, perfectly smoothed electrical current, optimum run times, on off cycles that don't in any way mirror real life living circumstances (who take 10 minutes to look for a pair of socks in the closet in the morning to let their bulbs "warm up" and then leaves the light on for another 2 hours and 50 minutes because the ideal run time is 3 hours at a time?). We have conducted our own "experiment" with CFLS and replaced several bulbs in side-by side fixtures (same current, same fixtures, same location in the house) and they just don't live up to the claims. In fact, we replaced 5 bulbs with CFLs and placed a piece of tape inside the fixture (not on the bulb) with the date on which the bulbs were replaced and all but one failed within 6 months. SIX MONTHS! Meanwhile, the incandescents are burning strong more than a year and a half later. I'm all for efficiency and "greenness" but these CFLs aren't it. They're the Kool-Aid that the government is trying to force us to drink. When I have to replace my bulbs more often, with more expensive bulbs (and amazingly my KWH used on my electric bills are virtually identical!), there is no savings to me, the end consumer. Of course, an electrician friend of mine who has apparently already consumed a gallon or so of the Kool-Aid said, "Well, it's because they're not designed to handle heat or dampness....you can't use them in recessed lighting, enclosed lighting or places that get too warm or damp like kitchens/bathrooms. You need to buy the high quality ones that are more expensive and replace your fixtures"......WHAT???? So let me get this straight....I need to pay even more for my bulbs if I want them to live up to the claims on the box, AND invest capital dollars in replacing all of my existing fixtures (which work just fine with incandescent bulbs) with fixtures that cost even more money and interrupt the design of my home because they can't be recessed or enclosed? And to top it all off, if my 1 year old knocks over a lamp and the bulb breaks, I might as well just buy a new house and start over because the clean up necessary to avoid mercury exposure is ridiculous? No thanks. I've stockpiled my incandescents already. When LED becomes a more reasonably priced technology and is integrable into my existing fixtures that I've already paid for, I'll consider changing over.

January 02 2013 at 12:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
hnrymrgnpmly

WHEN THE TRANSFORMERS IN THE CFL BULB BURNS OUT AND TAKES YOUR HOUSE WITH THEM , WHATS THE COST THEN?

November 26 2012 at 9:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
hnrymrgnpmly

just wait till the little transformers jn the base of the cfl bulbs burn out and take your house with them. whats the cost then?

November 26 2012 at 9:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Keith B. Rosenberg

From personal experience CFLs do NOT last even 6000 hours. maybe 2000 hours. And they often last a shorter time than incandescents.

October 07 2012 at 9:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael Fisk

The cost of many LED bulbs has gone down considerably.
Yesterday 10/2/2012 I purchased an LED (3pk.) of 25 watt that have a three year limited warranty, are rated at
15,000 hours and use 4 watts. Lights of America is the brand name and they are sold through Costco.
Home Depot also has some individual 60w LED (8w) for about $10 each.

October 03 2012 at 1:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael Fisk

The cost of many LED bulbs has gone down considerably.
Yesterday 10/2/2012 I purchased an LED (3pk.) of 25 watt that have a three year limited warranty, are rated at
15,000 hours and use 4 watts. Lights of America is the brand name and they are sold through Costco.
Home Depot also has some individual 60w LED (8w) for about $10 each.

October 03 2012 at 1:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael Fisk

The cost of many LED bulbs has gone down considerably.
Yesterday 10/2/2012 I purchased an LED (3pk.) of 25 watt that have a three year limited warranty, are rated at
15,000 hours and use 4 watts. Lights of America is the brand name and they are sold through Costco.
Home Depot also has some individual 60w LED (8w) for about $10 each.

October 03 2012 at 1:08 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mike_nickerson

I actually disagree that only small companies make LED lights. Philips sells them at Home Depot along with a Home Depot store brand and yup they are pricey but they are bright and last something like 4x longer than CFL's without the mercury. If you aren't sold on LED's or can't afford the initial investment I'd recommend what I did. I put LED's in all the fixtures that are a pain in the butt to change. That way I don't have to change them for years and I save $ on the electric bill too. Just not having to change those bulbs in the vaulted ceiling fixtures for years is payback enough for me but the light is as good as a regular bulb and there's a noticeable decrease in my electric bill.

September 27 2012 at 5:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tc

I just renovated one of my rooms and in the process evaluated different lighting options. I ended up purchasing recessed LED lights that had a quick modification kit for existing lights. The cost? ... $20/fixture after local utility subsidies at Home Depot. I was so impressed by these retro-fit lights that I also changed the ones in my showers (they're rated for damp environments) and bought a couple of flood light types at Costco for over my sink in currently existing eyeball spots. I had CFL spots in them, but by the time they warmed up to light up I was generally done with what I wanted the lighting for to begin with.

More expensive than traditional bulbs, etc, yes! But to purchase a new cover & lens for my shower was twelve bucks. For eight bucks more I got the retrofit fixture AND much brighter light without sacrificing energy savings. Oh... and the bulbs packaging say they'll last up to 35 years, though I'm not betting on that.

One last note... I will still use CFLs outside in my garden lights, since I've already got the bulbs on hand AND they are about a buck a package at Home Depot, but I don't want to risk them breaking in my house with their toxicity. Despite claims, I find they burn out rather quickly and I hate dealing with the disposal of them.

September 25 2012 at 4:01 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Are you a
Savings Expert?

If so, send us your idea and we'll try to include it in an upcoming Savings Experiment

Create a tip