New Consumer Protections for Air Travelers Will Land in 2011Some positive developments are on the horizon for America's beleaguered air travelers in 2011. I wish I could say that the changes will mean less crowded planes, more legroom in coach, and an easier experience in clearing security, but that's probably too much to wish for. Still, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood seems intent on raising the bar for the treatment of airline passengers.

Among the new rules likely to be finalized next April are mandates for greater transparency in airline pricing, higher reimbursements for bumped passengers and an expansion of the rule that requires U.S. airlines to let passengers off a plane if a tarmac delay exceeds three hours to cover foreign airlines as well

Other new rules would give customers the right to cancel their ticket within 24 hours of making their reservation without a penalty, reimburse them for luggage fees when checked bags are lost or delayed and require airlines to announce flight delays within 30 minutes of receiving the information.

"Stress and Uncertainty"

Increased compensation for being bumped off a plane is another change likely to be implemented. Compensation would go up from the current $400 to a maximum of $650 for short delays in getting a passenger to their destination on another flight and from $800 to $1300 for longer delays.

"Anyone who has flown before knows the stress and uncertainty that can accompany air travel," LaHood said recently in his blog. "By giving consumers more options, information, and most importantly, basic rights to fair treatment, we are trying to make air travel easier and more convenient for everyone."

Airlines say they support many of the new rules, insisting they want to make things better for the traveling public and support transparency. But their opposition to some of proposed regulations is nothing short of ridiculous. For example, the Air Transport Association of America, the lobbying group for the major U.S. airlines, opposes mandating the reimbursement of checked bag fees if the bags are lost.

"Bag fees are a competitive issue and whether a carrier chooses to refund a fee in all instances is a matter the marketplace should determine,'' the association wrote in response to the DOT's proposed regulations.

Delayed Implementation

The statement is an example of the arrogance of the airline industry: Any business focused on satisfying customers would give a refund for failing to deliver the service being paid for. It also isn't the smartest public relations strategy. The Obama administration seems to have grasped that embracing passenger rights in an environment of increasing customer dissatisfaction with air travel is a political no-brainer.

LaHood proposed the new regulations designed to strengthen consumer protection for airline customers last June. However, given the bureaucratic federal rule-making process, the final regulations won't be announced until around April 15.

Consumer advocates also deserve credit for the new regulations -- people like Kate Hanni, who was stuck with her family for nine hours on the tarmac on an American Airlines (AMR) flight without food or water in December 2006.

Hanni funneled her frustration over the experience into a grassroots organization,, which was the group primarily responsible for the rules implemented in April 2009. The new rules fine airlines as much as $27,500 per passenger if they fail to allow passengers to disembark from a plane during tarmac delays of longer than three hours.

The Desired Effect

The airline industry bitterly complained about those regulations too, saying they'd lead to large numbers of flight cancellations as airlines acted to avoid situations in which they would be fined for keeping a plane too long on the tarmac. That hasn't happened (except in the post-Christmas blizzard that slammed the East Coast and led to mass cancellations throughout the U.S). Instead, the drop in extended delays has been dramatic. Only 12 flights were delayed by more than three hours on the tarmac from May through September of this year, compared to 535 extended delays in the same period of 2009.

The October 2010 data is even more extraordinary: No tarmac delays of more than three hours, down from 11 in 2009. Moreover, flight cancellations were reduced from 0.99% in October 2009 to 0.97% for October 2010, clearly showing the reduction in tarmac delays also did not come with the massive increase in cancellations the airline industry predicted. Transportation Department statistics show the number of plane cancellations has remained relatively stable between 2009 and 2010.

Hanni said airlines need to learn that flyers have rights. "We really aren't against the airlines," Hanni told me in a recent phone conversation. "We are just trying to restore certain basic standards to travel."

Making Advertised Ticket Prices Match Reality

One of the biggest concerns of and other consumer groups is pricing transparency. Groups representing business travelers say corporations can't even figure out their travel budgets accurately because of the extra charges airlines have put on their pricing menu for a range of services from checking luggage to extra-legroom seats.

A recent Transportation-commissioned analysis that was done in connection with the proposed new rules found that only one major airline, Delta (DAL), posted the total ticket price on the initial Web booking pages. Other airline sites made customers wait until they were about to enter their credit card numbers before they found out the total fee.

Under the proposed regulations, not only airlines but travel booking sites such as Orbitz (OWW), Travelocity and Expedia (EXPE), would be forced to outline all charges for an airline ticket.

Another proposed change would stop airlines from advertising teaser fares for one-way tickets that don't exist because you have to fly round-trip to get the discounted price. Transportation officials say this is a deceptive practice.

Turning a $1 Special Into an $85+ Ticket

Those rules can't come soon enough and hopefully will create a little more honesty, particularly in the case of Spirit Airlines, in my opinion the airlines industry's No. 1 offender when it comes to a poor pricing transparency. I should have known better when I signed up for Spirit's $1 fare special for a trip this past weekend from Fort Lauderdale to Orlando.

The $1 fare quickly became around $60 unless you purchased a round-trip ticket, which wasn't disclosed on the website. So I booked a return trip even though I didn't want it, making sure it was on another day that the $1 fare was offered. After all, $2 wasn't bad for a round trip.

Once taxes, fuel surcharges, security charges and other unidentified Spirit Airlines fees were calculated, I owed $55.40. It was still pretty good I thought, though far north of the $1 teaser rate. Then, after I entered my credit card information, I was taken to a new page on the website and asked if I wanted to prepay my luggage fee. At least I could skip that fee, I rationalized, since I was taking a carry-on bag. But no: Spirit charges $30 for carry-ons.

Then there was a matter of the seat selection charge. You could get your seat for free, but only at the airport on the date of the flight. If you wanted to print out your boarding pass in advance, even for a middle seat, there was a $13 charge. More desirable aisle seats would cost me $20.

I opted to get my ticket at the airport counter, even if I had to wait in line. I also quickly unchecked the $12 travel insurance box that the Spirit website had automatically signed me up for before agreeing to pay for my ticket. By unchecking that box, I was able to get down my fare to $85.40.

Is There an Extra Fee for Good Customer Service?

It will be interesting to see how the new regulations might effect Spirit's creative fare marketing on its website. The proposed transparency rule would prevent airlines from automatically singing you up for travel insurance and other optional features.

My 40-minute Spirit flight this past Christmas weekend was uneventful, but I didn't find a copy of the airline's in-flight magazine in the seat pocket. Our flight attendant said the magazine was still published, but missing from our plane. Perhaps passengers were supposed to pay a $5 magazine charge on the website in advance of our flight.

I was looking forward to reading a message in the magazine from Spirit Airlines CEO Ben Baldanza explaining why his airline has the fairest prices. Last time I had flown on Spirit a year earlier, the magazine included a lively explanation of how Spirit charged customers only for the add-ons they needed. Over the summer, Baldanza testified before Congress that having luggage was not essential for going on vacation, so the charge for carry-on luggage was actually an optional fee.

At the end of the trip, the flight attendant thanked us for flying Spirit. He said he had hoped our experience was pleasant, but if it wasn't, he made it clear that Spirit wouldn't be hearing any complaints. If we weren't satisfied, he said, we could go to "," to book our next trip.

Sounds like good advice to me.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Investing in Startups

The lucrative and risky world of startups.

View Course »

Income Investing

Grow your nest-egg.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

I can't believe AOL posted a bogus website for If you leave out the 's', you get an advertising site.

January 03 2011 at 12:34 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

How about get rid of the god damned TSA? That would make us 'happy customers' again, but until then.... BOYCOTT FLYING!

The tsa hasn't caught a single terrorist attempt, they molest the travelling public, steal your belongings, and are immune from punishment!

January 02 2011 at 12:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Why does the media tell you everytime the airlines raise their fares? How would anyone know? If anyone is going to make laws, then it should be to fix the price to one set price. There is no reason the for the rate to be different on every flight. If I am going from Col. Ohio to Lax then the price shoud be the same no matter what flight I choose. Then if I wish a pillow, or meal, charge me. But most people can not go with out luggage. Limit it if you must, But be reasonamble. There should be no charge for a realistic suitcase

January 02 2011 at 11:19 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Sorry - forgot to include the following information on my last post. QUESTION for HOMELAND SECURITY : Why don't you publish the results of these 'Red Team Tests' ? We, the AMERICAN PEOPLE , have the right to know these results - for many reasons - one of them being the FACT that we are paying the salary of these TSA agents. We don't need to know the 'specific' details - HOWEVER - we have the RIGHT to know the pass -or- failure rating. And don't give your lame excuse of giving the 'terrorists' valuable information - they know more about our airport security systems then the 'average' AMERICAN CITIZEN does.

January 02 2011 at 9:52 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Speaking about airlines and airports - How about being MORE concerned about how SECURE the American people really are when they fly? Following are FACTS concerning 'Red Team Tests' that have been conducted by the FAA and other agencies:
- NEWARK AIRPORT - TSA agents missed concealed bombs and guns 20 out of 22 times the test was conducted.
LOS ANGELES LAX AIRPORT - TSA agents missed concealed explosives and bomb parts 50 times out of 70 attempts.

- CHICAGO O'HARE AIRPORT - Missed bombs and guns 45 out of 75 attempts.

** NOTE ** - All these tests involved concealment of items within CARRY-ON baggage**

** NOTE ** - The 'approximate' OVERALL FAILURE RATE of TSA AGENTS = 60-70% **
If these FACTS scare you - CONTACT your congressional reps. and LET THEM KNOW of your CONCERN.

January 02 2011 at 9:44 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to xtrees130's comment
Darrell Hansen

How about all the security standing around and scratching their asses. I pay for this but 1/2 of it is worthless. they're there just to fool the idoits into thinking they are safe. I fly once a month and every flight I take my 6 oz tube of toothpaste with....only 1/2 the time do they catch it and I lose it. I use to get frustrated with the airlines when booking a frequent flyer flight until my travel agent friend said that when she doesn't get the answer she wants, she politely hangs up and calls again to get another airline employee until she gets what she wants. That speaks volumns.

January 02 2011 at 9:59 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

So, should our government also dictate what all sellers of pizza can charge?? Should the price of a pizza be all inclusive??. Sorry american people - whether or not you want a pizza with 'everything' on it - you still must pay the price that would reflect the inclusion of all possible toppings. TO ALL PROGRESSIVES: Stop trying to push your SOCIALISM AGENDA onto this country. Your views are only supported by 'approximately' 20% of the American people(thank goodness).

January 02 2011 at 9:30 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

I agree that the airlines should have to state the 'base' cost of the tickets. However, every airline should be allowed to charge or not charge for additional services/items. Why should I have to pay the same price of a ticket (that would include any and everything( a pillow,blanket,etc.,etc.) if I would not want them??
When I travel I pack within my carry on luggage an inflatable pillow(can be found in camping section of most stores), a small size but very warm 'baby' blanket,etc.,etc. It seems that some people expect their flight to be like being at a hotel - NO - the airline flight is just to get you from point A to point B as safely as possible. Also, next time you purchase an airline ticket take note of the total amount of the 'base' price of the ticket is for various TAXES - federal,state,local,etc. Not all of the 'base' ticket price is established by the 'big,bad' money-making airlines. To the PROGRESSIVES - What made and is still making this country GREAT is the ability of companies to make money and the freedom of the AMERICAN PEOPLE to make their OWN CHOICES as to what companies they wish to patronize. In 'general' it is called CAPITALISM and it is NOT a bad thing.

January 02 2011 at 9:22 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to xtrees130's comment
Darrell Hansen

I would pay to watch you return something to walmart and have them impose a fee for YOUR choice to return it. you're returning a product adds cost that all customers share in paying as walmart does not charge you a fee for changing your mind. How about a fee for using a shopping know that's another expense I have to share even when I'm not using one myself. How about a fee to park in their parking lot...another walmart expense that has to be paid by us consumers.....I don't drive, I walk to walmart but have to pay for their parking lot when I buy their products. This issue with the fees for me isn't that they charge for checked bags, etc. it's the disception.

January 02 2011 at 9:45 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

do something about the theatre of the absurd TSA

January 02 2011 at 12:42 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

There should not be any fee of any kind for any reason by any airline. The price of the ticket should be all. Maybe all flyers should refuse to fly until all fees and hidden charges, other than the single basic flight ticket, from all airlines have been removed - not reassigned to the ticket price - but removed permanently without being allowed to be reinstated and no possiblilty of new inventive fees added either. That is: no overhead luggage fee, no exit or aisle row fee, no carry on or checked baggage fee, no meal fee (but instead full satisfying meals as part of the ticket), no blanket, headphone, or legroom fee, etc. Until this happens, flyers should not fly so as to force the airlines to restructure and remove the pricing. If this happens, airlines will be grounded because of no passengers. This would force them to remove the penalty fees for flying.

January 01 2011 at 9:48 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Dave's comment

TO: dave -
These are not "penalty fees" - they are CHOICES - if you don't want any of them don't elect them. By making airlines charge an 'all inclusive' price for tickets you are also making ALL flyers pay MORE. Why should I pay MORE if I do not want a pillow,blankie,meal,etc??????????????????? Sounds and Smells like a socialism agenda to me.

January 02 2011 at 10:01 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

Negotiate while you can! If you think that whats going on in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere equates to a victory, THINK AGAIN!! Look at how we have to travel in this country and what it entails as regards security checks; look at what happened last night in NYC where those who wanted to enjoy times square festivities has to undergo METAL DETECTOR surveillance! This is getting ridiculous! Is this what happens when one wins or is winning a war and the enemy has you cowering like this? In the meantime, the government has stripped or curtailed many of our civil rights as American citizens. Some is VERY WRONG with this Picture, VERY WRONG!!!!!

January 01 2011 at 5:44 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply