Obama Fails To Win Agreement on Chinese Currency or Trade Flows

Despite a pledge to make his Asian trip about creating jobs back in the U.S., President Obama failed to achieve most of stated objectives: a trade pact with South Korea, agreement on limiting surpluses by large trading partners and getting China to allow its currency to appreciate more.

What was agreed in Seoul, after two days of talks, was basically the G20 nations, composed of both industrial powers and developing countries, need to talk more. For example, the G20 will attempt to come up with indicative guidelines to help identify trade imbalances that require preventive and corrective action.

No Free Trade Agreement with South Korea

Going into the meeting, the U.S. had been seeking a firm 4% limit on trade surpluses."It was a big bust," says Gary C. Hufbauer, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. But Homi Kharas, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said the fact that the 20 nations reached an understanding of "what needs to be done in terms of outcomes," was a big step forward.

One of the big disappointments of the visit was the failure of negotiations to complete a free trade agreement with South Korea, which had originally been signed by President George W. Bush, but rejected by Obama when he took office. The U.S. asked the Koreans to reduce their emission standards because U.S. vehicles could not meet them and thus U.S. firms could not sell more cars there. "That seems to me not a very reasonable request at a time when we are trying desperately to do everything we can to reduce pollution as much as possible," Kharas says.

For its part, Korean farmers refused to budge on allowing more imports of U.S, beef from older cattle, which they limit for health reasons, though they are of dubious scientific basis.

"This was meant to be the passageway to opening up a whole new trade policy by this administration," Hufbauer says. "The lesson is if special interests can hold up this deal, where there is a big spotlight, how are you going to reach agreement in other cases where there are also special interests? Opponents of trade are quite joyful about this and I think this will harden their resistance and probably create more demands."

Still Working on Free Trade with Many Countries

The U.S. also has negotiated but not implemented free trade agreements with Colombia and Panama and is in the process of negotiating a deal with a Pacific Partnership that includes Vietnam, Singapore and Australia as well as Chile.

The G20 meeting was unusually acrimonious, largely because critics like Germany, Brazil and China attacked the U.S. for the Federal Reserve's decision to buy $600 billion of U.S. Treasury bonds in an effort to stimulate the economy, a process called quantitative easing.

Developing countries are concerned that investor funds -- known as "hot money" -- will flee the U.S. and rush into their economies, driving up inflation and creating instability. " I know the commentary tends to focus on the inevitable areas of disagreement," Obama said, "but the fact is the 20 major economies gathered here are in broad agreement on the way forward." He said there was an agreement on four areas: balanced trade, exchange rates must be economically realistic, financial regulatory reform and development as a key driver of growth.

The concluding communiqué, which originally contained wording condemning "competitive undervaluation", was changed at the last minute to "competitive devaluation" which was designed not to offend China, which does keep its currency undervalued.

The lack of agreement basically allows countries to continue to go their own way in setting their currency policy. In fact, the G20 endorsed "carefully designed macro-prudential measures."

Criticism Aimed at Bernanke

This is a veiled reference to currency controls that have been adopted by a number of countries, including Brazil, China and Taiwan, that are designed to limit the amount of foreign investment flowing into their countries. " I do think that since there was such a dust-up, that means the U.S. and the Fed will be quite circumspect and pay a lot of attention to foreign opinion and exchange rates as they implement quantitative easing," Hufbauer said.

Rather than debate Chinese currency policy, as the U.S. had hoped, the G20 ganged up on the U.S. over quantitative easing, with central bankers taking the unusual step of criticizing Fed chairman Ben S. Bernanke. In the past, central bankers have tended to be very clubby and didn't often speak ill of their brethren.

Adding spice to the drama was an unprecedented criticism of Bernanke's policies by former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan, who accused the Fed of intentionally weakening the dollar and driving up currencies elsewhere. That drew an unusual denial from Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. No former Fed chairman has attacked his successor publicly in decades.

Kharas says that while China was not pressed to allow its currency to appreciate as the U.S. has demanded, there was progress because Beijing indicated that it could live with wage and price inflation of nearly 4%. Kharas believes that will be just as effective in controlling Chinese exports to the U.S. as raising the exchange rate because it will make products more expensive to produce in China.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

How to Buy a Car

How to get the best deal and buy a car with confidence.

View Course »

How much house can I afford

Home buying 101, evaluating one of your most important financial decisions.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

Obama should stop the world tours/vacations and political diversion activities and Fix our economy. Every economist states that the way to create jobs is via the private sector. This can only occur when the Federal Government stops its desire to plan and expand government role in the economy. The only citizens that have benefited by Central Government control are the government and state employees. These people, whose wages are paid by the tax payers, make 50% more in salary and are guaranteed work. The rest of the economy 80% of the work force must somehow pay for this dig a hole and fill it type government work.

November 18 2010 at 9:54 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Is anyone surprised by this? Our economy is in tatters, as a result of free-market free-wheeling and speculation. Anything we do now, to try to stabalize things at home, will of necessity have a deleterious effect on those countries who are benefiting the most from our free-fall. The big lesson to be learned here is, we have gone from being the "rescuer of the world" to being in need of a humanitarian rescue, and there are no takers. This is the real SUPPLY AND DEMAND. How do you like it? In 2000, and again in 2004, you voted, and paid, for it.

November 15 2010 at 12:41 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

Boy in a man's job! America is getting exactly what it voted for "Hoping for Change in 2012."

November 15 2010 at 8:32 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Can't this guy (president) get anything done right?

November 15 2010 at 8:16 AM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply

These Asian leaders know a loser when they seen one, being in the game far longer than Obama. He didn't count on them being avid monitors of the failing American economy, with a president who has no experience nor an ounce of wisdom. No one wants to put themselves at risk with a failure and jeopardize their own security, nor do they want any affiliations with an obvious loser.

November 15 2010 at 3:02 AM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply

Last time our president pow wowed with the economic leaders of the world they all told him to cut spending and complained about China's money policy's. So this time it's the exact same thing? What our president should listen to what the world is telling him and tighten his belt??

November 14 2010 at 11:27 PM Report abuse +8 rate up rate down Reply
Wes Andersen

I'm from E hanover NJ. What do all you guys in my home town think of all this? WES

November 14 2010 at 11:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

no trade agreement with korea, why would they agree to anything we protect them from the north we put in billions they don't need anything else, its time to stop mr president and start pulling our troops

November 14 2010 at 11:01 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Well, If you ladies are logging off, I will too. It's been a pleasure chatting with all of you! Have a good night!

November 14 2010 at 10:58 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Goodnight everyone, play nice and will talk to you all soon!

November 14 2010 at 10:57 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply