- Days left

Death tax repeal gets new life

death tax - the Grim ReaperWhen the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA 2001) was signed into law by President Bush, many expected that years of fighting over a permanent repeal of the federal estate tax would finally be over. Under EGTRRA 2001, the personal exemption available under the estate tax increased to $3.5 million in 2009 with a temporary repeal for 2010. The expectation was that some form of compromise bill would take effect, boosting the personal exemption to between $3.5 million and $5 million. That didn't happen.

Just four years after EGTRRA 2001 passed, the idea of complete repeal was back in the news. Majority Leader Sen. Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) was at the forefront of the movement, arguing that the federal estate tax destroyed small businesses. In a dramatic speech on the Senate floor, he argued:
If you are an enterprising entrepreneur who has worked hard to grow a family business or to keep and maintain that family farm, your spouse and children can expect to hear the knock of the tax man right after the Grim Reaper.


Despite Senator Frist's passionate plea for reform, nothing happened. And by nothing, I mean that there was not only no movement on federal estate tax repeal, there was no change to the existing law. Same exemption amount, same repeal for 2010, same sunset for 2011. That means unless Congress passes a law before the end of the year, the exemption amount will drop to $1 million. Some in Congress think that's too much; others believe it's too little. And yet, for nearly a decade, nothing has changed.

This July, it appeared there might be some progress on solving the federal estate tax problem. Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), a longtime opponent of the federal estate tax, and Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) joined in a bipartisan effort to increase the estate tax exemption to $5 million. The measure gained some initial support but, with an election looming, eventually lost steam. Congress seemed content to take a "wait and see" approach.

However, in the last few weeks, that has changed. GOP candidates, eager to distinguish themselves from their Democratic counterparts, have increasingly shown support for a complete repeal. More than half of the Republicans running for House and Senate have now signed a pledge crafted by the American Family Business Institute to eliminate the federal estate tax. You can check to see where your candidate stands on its website.

Those in favor of a federal estate tax repeal believe that momentum is now on their side. A recent poll by the nonprofit Tax Foundation indicated that a majority of taxpayers believe the federal estate tax is the most unfair federal tax, despite the fact that, statistically, if affects the least taxpayers.

Opponents note, however, that the loss in revenue is significant especially in a down economy. The IRS hasn't yet calculated the total figures lost in 2010 due to the one time repeal. However, at least four billionaires have escaped the clutches of the federal estate tax this year, including New York's George Steinbrenner and Texas' Tim Duncan, with estimates of lost revenue for the year totaling into the billions.

It has been suggested by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities that making permanent the repeal of the estate tax after 2010 would add almost $1.3 trillion to the deficit between fiscal years 2012 and 2021. To put that into perspective, the entire discretionary spending budget for 2010 was $1.368 trillion -- that includes the budgets for all departments including Defense, Education and Labor.

Despite the huge hit to the Treasury, backers of a complete repeal are betting that the perception of the tax as unfair will lead to taxpayer votes next week. The bigger question is whether that will translate into Congressional support before 2011.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

How Financial Planners go Grocery Shopping

Learn to shop smart and save.

View Course »

Understanding Credit Scores

Credit scores matter -- learn how to improve your score.

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

What is IRS Form 8824: Like-Kind Exchange

Ordinarily, when you sell something for more than what you paid to get it, you have a capital gain; when you sell it for less than what you paid, you have a capital loss. Both can affect your taxes. But if you immediately buy a similar property to replace the one you sold, the tax code calls that a "like-kind exchange," and it lets you delay some or all of the tax effects. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) uses Form 8824 for like-kind exchanges.

What are ABLE Accounts? Tax Benefits Explained

Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) accounts allow the families of disabled young people to set aside money for their care in a way that earns special tax benefits. ABLE accounts work much like the so-called 529 accounts that families can use to save money for education; in fact, an ABLE account is really a special kind of 529.

What is IRS Form 8829: Expenses for Business Use of Your Home

One of the many benefits of working at home is that you can deduct legitimate expenses from your taxes. The downside is that since home office tax deductions are so easily abused, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tends to scrutinize them more closely than other parts of your tax return. However, if you are able to substantiate your home office deductions, you shouldn't be afraid to claim them. IRS Form 8829 helps you determine what you can and cannot claim.

What is IRS Form 8859: Carryforward of D.C. First-Time Homebuyer Credit

Form 8859 is a tax form that will never be used by the majority of taxpayers. However, if you live in the District of Columbia (D.C.), it could be the key to saving thousands of dollars on your taxes. While many first-time home purchasers in D.C. are entitled to a federal tax credit, Form 8859 calculates the amount of carry-forward credit you can use in future years, not the amount of your initial tax credit.

What is IRS Form 8379: Injured Spouse Allocation

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has the power to seize income tax refunds when a taxpayer owes certain debts, such as unpaid taxes or overdue child support. Sometimes, a married couple's joint tax refund will be seized because of a debt for which only one spouse is responsible. When that happens, the other spouse is said to be "injured" and can file Form 8379 to get at least some of the refund.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum