For New Jersey's Chris Christie, It Was Simply a Tunnel Into Debt

ARC rail tunnel planned to connect N.J. and N.Y.New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) today canceled the multibillion dollar ARC Tunnel, the nation's largest public works project, for the second time in less than a month. Christie ignored pleas from transit advocates -- and the federal government -- that the planned commuter rail tunnel under the Hudson River between Northern New Jersey and New York City was desperately needed. Christie really never indicated if he agreed with the practical need for the tunnel, but he couldn't be clearer about why he opposed it.

Clearly a rising star in the Republican Party, Christie initially declared the tunnel dead on Oct. 7, saying the state could not afford the price tag and the cost overruns that would go with it. He then agreed to hold off on a final decision for two weeks at the request of U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, who wanted to save the project, which was already in the early stages of construction (pictured). That deadline expired on Oct. 22 but was extended. Still, in the end, Christie was unmoved by arguments about reducing congestion or LaHood's offer to kick in an additional $358 million to cover New Jersey's costs.

"It's a dollars and sense issue. I cannot place, upon the citizens of the state of New Jersey, an open-ended letter of credit," The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J., quotes Christie as saying.

"No End to Traffic Congestion"


Transportation Secretary LaHood was clearly annoyed, saying in a statement, "I am extremely disappointed in Governor Christie's decision to abandon the ARC tunnel project, which is a devastating blow to thousands of workers, millions of commuters and the state's economic future. The governor's decision to stop work on this project means commuters -- who would have saved 45 minutes each day thanks to the ARC tunnel -- will instead see no end to traffic congestion and ever-longer wait times on train platforms."

Even more livid was New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg (D), whose statement included: "This is a tragic day in New Jersey's history. Two weeks ago, Governor Christie made the biggest public policy blunder in New Jersey's history. Today he repeated it. Today he killed the prospect for improving New Jersey's economy and creating thousands of new jobs. He increased the amount of toxic fumes that will be discharged from idling cars stuck in traffic, and he took away an opportunity for New Jersey housing values to go up."

Christie, whose bull-in-a-China-shop style either infuriates or delights people, will continue to be a GOP up-and-comer after making his decision -- at least in the short term -- because his profile has been raised, says Rider University political scientist Ben Dworkin. The former U.S. attorney enjoys high approval ratings among the state's voters.

Nonetheless, New Jersey will pay a financial price. The state will have to pay back the $350 million in federal funds already spent on the project. New Jersey also won't be receiving the $3 billion appropriated by Congress for the nine-mile-long tunnel. New Jersey had agreed to spend $2.7 billion on ARC, with another $3 billion coming from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Many experts say the project's benefits far outweigh the risks.

Ancient and Overburdened


According to the Regional Plan Association (RPA), ARC would have boosted property values, helped improve air quality and given New Jersey residents more access to lucrative jobs in New York City. Since the existing Hudson rail tunnel was built 100 years ago, New Jersey's population has more than quadrupled, and New York City's has nearly tripled. The tunnel's capacity to handle Amtrak and New Jersey Transit rail traffic has been exceeded for years, making the need for the second tube obvious to advocates.

"Unfortunately it does not appear as though the governor gave responsible or serious consideration to any proposals to phase the project, reduce project costs, introduce private funding or accept additional funds from the federal government to help cover overruns, including options that would defer any additional cost to the state until after the project was generating substantial economic and tax benefits," the RPA says.

Christie has consistently argued that he's acting in the state's best fiscal interest to avoid cost overruns that could have pushed the project's cost up to $14 billion, according to Christie administration estimates. Further complicating the matter is the potential insolvency of the state's Transportation Trust Fund, which funds work on infrastructure projects. The RPA argues that Christie will probably use the ARC money for these projects. Christie plans to announce a separate plan for fix the transportation fund. One thing's for sure: He opposes raising the gasoline tax, which largely finances the fund.

"None of the proposals put forth by federal officials or New Jersey's congressional delegation -- despite unsupported statements to the contrary -- eliminate, or even remotely limit, New Jersey's exposure to the potentially billions in cost overruns," according to a statement on Christie's blog. "Loans or any phase in of the project merely delays the costs to New Jersey and its taxpayers. I repeat -- none of the alternatives offered change the fact that New Jersey would be solely on the hook for all ARC tunnel overruns."

Unfortunately, the state still needs a reliable rail transport system, which won't be cheap. The 6,000 yearly construction jobs ARC would have created and the 45,000 permanent ones would have been nice, too.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Introduction to Economic Indicators

Measure the performance of the economy.

View Course »

Asset Allocation

Learn the most important step in structuring an investment portfolio.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

45 Comments

Filter by:
Bearmaul

Isn't it more properly the Democrats job to dig us into a hole?

October 29 2010 at 5:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
captives

Gov. Christie made the right decision. All anyone has to do is think back to estimated and then real cost of the Big Dig in Boston. It was a huge fiasco, paid for by every taxpayer in the US.

October 29 2010 at 5:31 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to captives's comment
msmb

Right, so we never should have even attempted the Big Dig and just let our infrastructure crumble. There are ways to demand accountability and still make large projects like this happen. Every other developed country is surpassing us in building state-of-the-art infrastructure that will enable them to prosper in the 21st century. The US, on the other hand, is sticking its head in the sand, and dooming itself to becoming an banana republic.

October 29 2010 at 3:44 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
Ralph L. Nappi

I was born and raised in NJ and moved to GA in 1992. I have never been more proud of NJ then I am now. Thank God for Chris Christie. He should have been Govenor of Mass. before the

October 28 2010 at 5:24 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
wbc52

Its a shame we don't have more people in government that use their head. I haop Christi runs in '12.

October 28 2010 at 3:43 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
mbrauti

As I understand, the current tunnel plan does not go to Grand Central Station, where most of the midtown office and service jobs are located. Governor Christi's decisions of the past month have raised important issues regarding the real value of the ARC project. New York, as well as the Federal,State and Port Authority should all share in the costs. When the time is right,a proper project going all the way to Grand Central with proper costs will emerge.

October 28 2010 at 2:23 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
sgentilejr

Cristi did not stop the tunnel project to save money. He stopped it so he could spend money on his other pet projects and he already sold $2 billion of bonds and placed the state DEEPER into debt without asking for voter approval of the bonds he sold. Cristi is placing 185,000 commuters lives in danger everyday by sending the train through a 100 year old tunnel below the Hudson River. It is the oldest train tunnel below a river inside the USA. If that one and only tunnel should fail all tens of thousands of lives lost fall on Cristi's hands. But lives don't matter to him either. If that one and only existing tunnel fails it would take over 10 years to build a new one. In the mean time all rail traffic (Amtrack,commuter trains and freight trains) on the east coast that goes through that one and only train tunnel would all be sitting idle and nothing moves by rail. No terrorist could do a better job of screwing up our infrastructure than Cristi has done. This only proves any idiot can act as an Obstructionist, stop progress and move us back into the Stone Age.

October 28 2010 at 12:25 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
GREGORY

GO GOV YOU HAVE OUR BEST INTEREST IN MIND. THERE IS A SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM, HAVE A NON UNION COMPANY BUILD IT. THEY WILL DO JUST AS GOOD A JOB AND IT WILL BE A LOT LESS EXPENSIVE.

October 28 2010 at 12:06 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
gbaran2

repubhlicans like Christie couldn't see the benifit of an interstate highway system either!!

October 28 2010 at 11:53 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to gbaran2's comment
bardshark

Yes gbaran2, those pesky, obstructionist republicans ... like President Eisenhower, who championed and signed into law the very same interstate highway system you mention (1956, look it up). Typical liberal talking points without regard to actual facts or history. gbaran2, and those of similar liberal prejudices, focus on what Christie is doing rather than simply trying to advance your prejudice (ignorance).

October 28 2010 at 12:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
scottvtm

The writer's opinions could not be more biased. Christie's decision could not be more clearly stated. No wonder he enjoys such high approval ratings in NJ.

October 28 2010 at 11:42 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Orlando

Back to the Christie tunnel issue! Could there be another issue involved in stopping the building of the NJ-NY tunnel besides cost over runs? Is Governor Christie angling for a bigger piece of the construction contract pie for his campaign finance backers? Shocked you say? Isn't that the proven hunger of both Republican and Democratic politicians who gain office with squeaky clean records only to soil themselves? If big money is involved...sooner or later... the tunnel WILL be built... Christie or no! Roland C. (Orlando) Woodaka

October 28 2010 at 11:29 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply