It's not unusual for a departing chief executive to maintain some involvement with the corporation he or she led, usually by holding onto or taking a position on the company's board of directors.

That can be a bad idea, however, according to a report released earlier this month by The Conference Board, a nonprofit business research group. The decision to retain the former CEO as a board member could have benign consequences, but analysis shows that isn't always the case, says Jason Schloetzer of Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business and author of the report.

"News coverage surrounding instances of board retention suggests that these CEOs frequently maintain a high profile and continue to have significant -- sometimes damaging -- involvement within the firm," Schloetzer says.

"We'll Have a Successful IPO"

Take Edward Whitacre, the former CEO and still chairman of General Motors. Speaking in San Antonio on Wednesday, Whitacre suggested that the price of GM shares in its anticipated initial public offering next month will likely be "somewhere in the $20 range. . . $20, $25, something like that would be my guess," Reuters reported Whitacre as saying.

The news agency also quoted Whitacre saying, "I can't say how much we'll sell, but I can say we'll have a successful IPO sometime in November." Further, the former AT&T (T) executive predicted that GM's offering would effectively reduce the federal government's 61% stake in the Detroit automaker.

Forget for the moment that public statements about a company's stock during an IPO are forbidden under federal "quiet period" regulations. Talking up a company's stock is best left to the CEO, which, in this case, is Daniel Akerson, who succeeded Whitacre on Sept. 1.

Official Documents Are More Circumspect

It's doubtful that Whitacre's comments will lead to a postponement of GM's IPO, although he likely violated Securities and Exchange Commission rules. Documents filed by GM officials in August to begin the IPO process didn't stipulate a price nor an anticipated date on which stock would begin trading.

Morningstar analyst David Whiston doesn't expect Whitacre's remarks to affect the IPO timeline. "I can't speak from a legal point of view on that," Whiston told the San Antonio Express-News. "But from a logistical point of view, the White House wants this done as quickly as possible so they can start selling the shares."

After declining comment earlier in the week, GM late Friday sought to distance itself from Whitacre's statements, saying in a regulatory filing that it can't predict whether the offering will be successful or help the government sell its stake in the company. Whitacre's comments "were not intended and should not be considered as offering material," GM said in the SEC filing.

The incident does suggest that Whitacre, despite his stated desire to return to private life after successfully navigating the automaker through post-bankruptcy, hasn't yet fully ceded the limelight.

Fortunately for GM, perhaps, the chairman isn't long for the boardroom. Upon announcing his decision to retire as CEO in August, Whitacre also said he'd step down as chairman on Dec. 31, when Akerson assumes that position, too.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

What Is Your Risk Tolerance?

Answer the question "What type of investor am I?".

View Course »

Behavioral Finance

Why do investors make the decisions that they do?

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

7 Comments

Filter by:
Doris

THE charities should look all these people up, as well as all we bailed out with our tax dollars, for donations. These people are the only ones left with any money, and well capable of giving good donations......unless they are all somewhere for great vacations, and wild weekends!

October 18 2010 at 8:31 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
wil2660

Besides a business degree what else do these people have to make them worth the millions they are paid, it boggles the mind that a person making an obsene amount of money for managing a co. can screw up to the point of ruining said co. and be fired and take even more millions with him when he leaves.

October 18 2010 at 4:01 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
kitharris1

ed doesn't do anything by accident. i'm sure this was talked about before hand. follow the money as always.

October 18 2010 at 2:00 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jwarney123

CEO's ARE FULL OF BALONEY! FIRE A CEO AND HIRE MILLION OF AMERICANS. WE THE MIDDLE CLASS CAN ENGINEER, DEVELOP, AND DELIVER INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS WITHOUT THE HELP OF CEO's THAT ONLY SELL OUT AMERICAN CAPABILITIES AND DREAMS.

October 18 2010 at 1:32 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
dodacrazy

Well turn it over to Scott and loose, then blame Roger as you always DO.

October 18 2010 at 12:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
joe

The more stupid and here's the BIG one: ARROGANT(they seem to be tied together) the CEO is, the larger the Golden Parachute is when they wreck the company and grab the cash investmants of the stock holding middle class.

October 18 2010 at 11:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Truwriter

These guys exist on their lucrative golden parachuts, so tie a gag clause into the millions they get when they retire. They will shut up.

October 18 2010 at 8:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply