The Foreclosure Crisis: Eroding Trust -- and Ending the Recovery?

Mortgage foreclosure crisisThough just about everyone has heard about the scandal over "robo-signing" of foreclosure documents, the issues are so complex that what's at stake isn't always clear. After reading dozens of news accounts, editorials and the most widely followed financial blogs, I've assembled a basic account of the scandal -- and outlined five of its potential implications.

1. That homeowners who failed to pay their mortgages will lose their homes through the foreclosure process is not the primary issue. What's at stake is due process of law.

2. The issue isn't just about a minor "technical procedure," as the banks and mortgage-servicing industry are claiming. Boiled down to its essence, the problem is simple: If an individual citizen did what the banking/mortgage-service industry has done, that is, forge signatures and ignore procedures designed to protect property rights, then the documents would be rejected and the individual would be accused of fraud or embezzlement.

Yet, when banks and mortgage servicers break these same laws, it gets brushed aside as a trivial "oops, we forgot to dot the i" technicality. This flouting of the law by politically powerful banks undermines one of the key tenets of the American way, which is that we're all equal before the law.

The systemic flouting of the law that has been uncovered points to a disturbing conclusion: Two systems of law are operating in our nation, one for "the little guy" and one for banks and mortgage servicers.

Accounts of abuse, ignoring procedural law and gross incompetence are now legion. For instance, one Florida homeowner who didn't even have a mortgage was foreclosed by Bank of America (BAC). Only after a local newspaper began investigating the case did the bank move to sort out what could be viewed as an illegal "taking" of real property.

In another case, Deutsche Bank National Trust filed to foreclose even though it had sold the mortgage to Goldman Sachs, meaning it had no legal right to foreclose. One judge found that roughly half (46 out of 104) of the foreclosure motions filed in his court were so full of errors that he refused to approve them.

Many commentators have already dismantled the bank/mortgage servicers' claims that the legal issues are all just trivial technicalities. It's hardly trivial that documents filed in court are the foundation of our legal system. A signed affidavit is legally equivalent to providing live testimony in court. If an affidavit is untrue, that's the same as lying in court, which is a crime called perjury.

Yet the current system is filled with "robo-signers" who electronically signed up to 10,000 foreclosure filing a month, making a legal claim of their accuracy. Furthermore, though attorneys are prohibited from making a material misrepresentation to the court, it's clear that such misrepresentations of fact (such as who actually owns the mortgage) are widespread in foreclosure proceedings.

3. The system of
slicing up mortgages into pieces and then bundling the pieces into securities is structurally flawed.

In essence, the widespread "packaging" of hundreds of mortgages into mortgage-backed securities (MBS) marketed by Wall Street investment banks has bypassed the property rights laws that underpin ownership and transfer of home loans and deeds.

In the pre-MBS days, a bank would originate a home mortgage and then hold the loan as an asset, collecting the interest and principal payments from the homeowner. But Wall Street banks divided the payments that go toward interest and loan principal into "tranches," or slices, which were assembled by risk and rate of return into pools of mortgages that were then sold as a single security.

With the mortgages divided into pieces that were then bundled into securities that were bought and sold numerous times, the ownership of the underlying mortgage and home often became muddled. This is how two different companies can end up filing foreclosure documents on the same house.

Add in the large number of securitized home equity loans that piggyback on first mortgages and derivative securities such as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), and you get a nightmarish mishmash of "senior tranches" and multiple claims on the same property.

Stripped of complexity, the issue is straightforward: Every time these securities changed hands, the various claims on the underlying house should have been transferred as well. In many cases, they weren't. In some cases, foreclosures have been allowed even when the original mortgage has been lost.

If you don't need the original document to take someone's home, then exactly what rule of law is at work in America?

4. The nation's system for recording mortgages is woefully inadequate to the task of tracking home loans that have been sliced and diced into tranches and traded freely as securities.

To enable a smooth trading system of these MBS, the banking/mortgage industry set up a privately owned loan-tracking service known as the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) in 1997. The registry acts a sort of legal proxy of ownership, thereby eliminating the need to record changes in property ownership in the traditional manner, i.e. in local land records.

MERS records loan assignments electronically. It doesn't own the mortgages it registeres, but it's listed in public records as a nominee for the actual owner of the loan or as the original mortgage holder.

Assigning ownership of mortgages to this registry saved the industry a bundle. MERS was estimated to have saved the mortgage industry an $1 billion in its first decade of existence. Some 60 million loans are registered to MERS.

5. Outright foreclosure fraud is now systemic. This includes forged signatures, falsified mortgage numbers, false claims of ownership, false claims that the paperwork has been properly reviewed and document fabrication.

Indeed, for a price, you can have any missing document you might need to file a foreclosure motion "recreated" or "created" out of thin air.

Now that this systemic reliance on falsified documents, forged signatures and myriad "shortcuts" (such as not having the original mortgage) has been revealed, several lenders have halted foreclosures and evictions. Some have stopped proceedings in the 23 states that require a judge's approval, while others such as Bank of America have halted foreclosures in all 50 states.

In response to a public outcry about these widespread abuses, the attorneys general of 40 states are pooling resources to investigate the mortgage and foreclosure industries. One state AG has already filed suit against a leading mortgage servicer, alleging fraud in foreclosures processed by the firm. Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray said the fraud was the "tip of an iceberg of industrywide abuse of the foreclosure process" and is asking for civil penalties of up to $25,000 for each violation of consumer laws.

Freezing the U.S. Real Estate Market

This systemic breakdown of the procedural laws intended to protect property rights may well have far-reaching consequences beyond lawsuits by public agencies and by individuals who have been harmed or defrauded.

Flawed foreclosure documents mean sales of foreclosed home are in limbo: How can any future owner obtain title insurance when the ownership of the mortgage and thus the integrity of the foreclosure itself is in question?

If millions of foreclosed homes cannot be sold with unambiguously clear titles, then that will effectively freeze a significant portion of the American real estate market. After all, about a third of all home sales involve residences in default or foreclosure.

Fannie Mae has been pulling foreclosed homes off the market, scotching signed deals and removing properties from inventory of unsold homes. Homeowners already in the foreclosure process are now wondering if the foreclosure-fraud debacle can delay or even cancel their impending eviction.

Indeed, the widespread fraud and blatant flouting of the law by politically powerful lenders is eroding many Americans' belief in the fairness of the financial and legal systems. As a result, some are asking why they should continue following the rules when lenders and mortgage servicers evade and abuse the law with impunity.

How Does the U.S. Solve Its Real Estate Crisis?

Stories about middle-class homeowners ensnared in what's either fraud or misrepresentation, depending on one's interpretation, now include a troubling subtext: Some of these once rock-solid citizens are refusing to comply with the demands of lenders.

Some high-visibility commentators are characterizing the foreclosure and MBS debacle as "the biggest fraud in the history of the capital markets." Hyperbole, or simply the truth few dare to state?

While that can be debated, what cannot be debated is the massive loss of trust in the foundations of property rights and rule of law that has occurred. Also not debatable is the impact this loss of trust is having on the housing market, large sections of which are effectively locked.

If distressed mortgages cannot be foreclosed and impaired debts can't be liquidated via auctions or sales on the open market, then how does the U.S. unburden itself of the overhang of housing supply and uncollectible mortgages? It cannot do so with this cloud hanging over the housing and mortgage markets. That will have serious consequences for banks that aren't collecting mortgage payments, for servicers facing massive lawsuits and, eventually, for the value of housing in a market stuffed with a "shadow inventory" of distressed or defaulted homes that can't be sold.

Could the foreclosure mess end up stalling the economic recovery? Perhaps the answer can be found by rephrasing the question: How can an economy be healthy if its mortgage, banking and housing markets are in a state of profound financial and legal disruption?

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Investing in Emerging Markets

Learn to invest in a globalized world.

View Course »

Finding Stock Ideas

Learn to do your research and find investments.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

119 Comments

Filter by:
adelston2

IF I PAY MY MORTGAGE OFF DO I OWN MY OWN HOME AT THIS POINT???THIS MORTGAGE WAS MADE JANUARY 2006 RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MORTGAGE MESS.HOW DO I FIND OUT WHO REALY OWNES THIS NOTE??...THE MORTGAGE WAS WITH WELLS FARGO...I ALSO HAVE ANOTHER MORTGAGE ON A RENTAL PROPERTY THAT MADE WITH BANK OF AMERICA DURING NOVEMBER OF 2005.ARE ALL OF THESE MORTGAGES SLICED UP TO DIFFERENT HOLDERS?...OR WAS IT JUST THE ADJUSTABLE RATE MORTGAGES?...COME TO THINK OF IT WHY WOULD THEY STOP AT JUST ADJUSTABLE RATE MORTGAGES FOR THEIR MORTGAGED BACKED SECURITIES...THEY PROBABLY GAMBLED THE WHOLE MORTGAGE ECONOMY AWAY YEARS AGO TO MBS"S.....THEY JUST GOT CAUGHT IN 2010......HOW FAR BACK COULD THIS ACTUALLY GO??

February 13 2011 at 7:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
wc92264

One way to reduce the shadow inventory that is about to explode on to the market place is for congress to enact legislation to force the banks to write down all of its mortgages to current market value and offer current mortgage rates to all homeowners that are currently under water.After all it was with the congressional approval that bailed out these banks.Time for Mainstreet to get bailed out.It is no longer a moral dilema for homeowners to walk away from their loans after the banks refuse to deal with them.Wall Street,the Banks and Big Business in general has shown us that profit trumps all and that walking away is simply a sound business decision.

November 09 2010 at 12:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Regina

OK... So they can't find the paper on my mortgage, to prove they (the "bank") have a lien on my property. They want to forclose, but can't since they don't have the "papers" Does that mean I wont have to pay the "service company" anymore, and I can spend that money I was paying the "service" company to buy stuff to get the economy going again. Sounds like a good stimulus package to me.

October 13 2010 at 12:57 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
knute9

I wonder if the Second American Revolution is going to be like the French and Russian.

October 12 2010 at 7:09 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
commonsenseleft

To anyone who has had exposure to civil court processes, this crisis should come as no surprise. Swearing out false affidavits is SOP in highly contested civil cases. Why? There is no penalty for lying (nobody is ever charged with perjury), but if the court believes the liar there is everything to be gained, and, of course, justice loses -- just as in this crisis. As always, it's all about the money. Is it any wonder Americans don't trust institutions anymore?

October 12 2010 at 10:47 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MSmailbox

I'm no attorney, but rather a former-IT/Telecom Specialist. If I had a mess like this one, I'd restore back to some relatively stable point, say epoch 2000, then work forward, slowly and carefully closing out the dead accounts and balancing the books. Another alternative would be to move forward, insuring that the system is fixed, never allowing this to ever happen, again. Kicking someone out of their home is always more expensive in the long run, in terms of trust, confidence and destroyed relationships. It may seem that repo'ing a house is a good thing, but it can become a liability to the company and to social order.

October 12 2010 at 10:39 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
glasses60

The issuing bank should not be allowed to sll a mortgage unless the bank is in trouble. No bank should give a mortgage to anyone who has poor credit. Homeowners have to be able to pay their property taxes, heat, insurance, maintenance as well as their mortgage. Homeownership is not for everyone, contrary to the socialistic agenda of this administration.

October 12 2010 at 10:38 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to glasses60's comment
Ann

Reality check please. "This administration" didn't do this. It was done during the unregulated "Bush administration". This is just the "administration" that is being blamed for the mess.

October 14 2010 at 1:27 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
jkennedy806

There is alot wrong with the banking picture. This crisis has proven that banks just can't be trusted anymore, nor Wall Street, nor Washington. Everyone is suffering from this, I have a loan that was transferred. If you are in foreclosure ask the bank about deed in lieu, if the nice bank tells you we don't do deed in lieu it's because your title is screwed up. right from the get go Money Management International, a useless waste of taxpayer money, told me don't go for deed in lieu. That was last year, so the smucks in Washington knew that this was going on all along. NO MORE MERS, IF YOU ARE GOING TO TRANSFER THE LOAN file it in the deed office and pay your filing fee. If not it's garbage. If your loan is not in proper filing order, you win.

October 12 2010 at 9:29 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
Hello Debi

I know NO One wants to here this.. But the fact is this... Americans need a SECOND CHANCE. The credit system needs to change. There are numerous people who really CAN afford a new home... but their credit is tarnished due to unforseen circumstances. Currently our sytem lumps all into one catagory... PAID and UNPAID /late. There needs to be catagories for the REASONS WHY.... Placing those who wilfully default into lower credit scores and those with accidents/injuries into a higher credit score.... The economy will NEVER RECOVER under our current and UNJUST credit system.

October 12 2010 at 7:00 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
ssyankeeclipper

i heard on our local news that a new developement was being started with almost 300 new homes in a not to shabby area of the county and this is big exciting news for the area that will promote hundreds of new families etc etc my question is are they giving these new homes away? if not who do they think is buying them ? another senseless bogus story.. not to mention every 1/8 of a mile is 1 or more homes for sale..who do they think they're kidding?

October 12 2010 at 6:49 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply