Relacore False Advertising Lawsuits Get Class Action StatusThe New Jersey Supreme Court handed a victory to both the plaintiffs and advocates of truth in advertising this week when it ruled that lawsuits against the maker of dietary supplement Relacore could go forward as a class action.

If you've ever heard of Relacore, or purchased it for $40 a bottle at a drug store, it's surely only because of the product's marketing campaign: Relacore's a pill, and there's no way to tell what it does just by looking at it. Contrast that with say, a screwdriver or a cell phone. Unless a marketer persuaded you -- or a friend who had in turn been persuaded by a marketer -- to buy it, there's no way you'd just pick it off the shelf and pop it in your mouth.

Such products are called "credence goods," explains consumer advocacy group Public Citizen's Consumer Law and Policy Blog, and Relacore's marketing didn't deserve any credence, according to the lawsuits filed against it. Distributor Carter Reed's claim that Relacore attacked the "stress-to-belly-fat cycle" had no proof.

However, regardless of the strength of plaintiffs' claims that Relacore's marketing was false, their most powerful weapon to stop the false advertising was attaining class action status. A class action suit means real money's at stake, and it's a powerful motivator for a corporate defendant to agree to a settlement. Indeed, given that each individual plaintiff lost only $40 a bottle, it's unlikely that any single plaintiff would have seen a suit through to the end, and unless a court rules, Carter Reed's marketing can go on.

But to be a class, plaintiffs have to prove their claims share enough features to make it appropriate to group them together. One of the things plaintiffs have to prove is that law and fact issues shared by the class members outweigh the individual issues. Unfortunately for plaintiffs in the Relacore case, they lost the class action fight at both the trial level and intermediate appellate level because the courts found individual issues predominated. The appellate court specifically focused on the fact that Relacore did so much marketing, and made many different claims in different media: It decided that each plaintiff would have to show which marketing they relied on in making the purchase.

However, on appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court, public interest groups helped plaintiff Melissa Lee persuade all the justices that a class should be certified, because if, as claimed, all the marketing claims were false, it didn't matter which marketing any individual relied on. Because Relacore is a credence good, marketing was the only reason anyone purchased it: Thus, if the all of its marketing claims were false, the burden of proving the advertising was unlawful and caused all the individual damages was met.

As a result, the case will go forward as a class action, at least on its New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act claim -- the court didn't rule on class status for the other claims, finding an insufficient record -- and Carter Reed is going to have back up its claims about Relacore, or cease making the claims and pay out triple damages and attorneys fees. Or Carter Reed could settle, which would surely also involve stopping its marketing of Relacore.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Introduction to ETFs

The basics of Exchange Traded Funds and why ETFs are hot.

View Course »

Goal Setting

Want to succeed? Then you need goals!

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

If your speaking Of "Relacore, when you talk about diet pills to eat the same amount of food, and still lose weight, IF IT IS A "Miracle" weight loss drug, Watch out. If it were a true weight loss solution, You Would Definitely Read about it in The "New England Journal Of Medicine", or The "Journal Of The nAmerican Medical Association". If you don't read about a weight loss solution there, DON'T YOU BE?LIEVE IT !! Instaed I reccomend a book called "Dieting For Dummies" written BY A Nutritionist, who is a member of the american dietic association, or similar books written by dietitionists, or Nutritionists, Not that you don't know whats in them. They tell you to basically eat a balance4d diet, and get excerise as va true means of controling weight, NOT that I'm fully detailing their whole contents. Anytime you hear, "eat your self silly, take a pill, and lose big weight, it's Bunk IF it says no effort needed, or has a miracle food for weight loss. Noone should tell you to surrender your health to a mail order solution that includes so-called miracle pills. That's MY PERSONMAL OPINION. SPEAKING ONLY FOR MYSELF. Oh Yeah, I'm NOT a medical Person.

October 01 2010 at 7:36 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

Can we get a class action suit going against Obama and all the rest of those democrats in congress for false patriotism, maybe Stephen Colbert can testify..........

October 01 2010 at 2:18 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply