- Days left

Study links booze, taxes to public health

×
sillouhette of a drunken guyA study out of the University of Florida has concluded that raising taxes on alcohol leads to lower rates of alcohol-related disease, injury, death and crime. The study was released online this week by the American Journal of Public Health in advance of the print edition.

The study found that increasing the average state tax on alcohol (you can see the individual state tax rates on beer, wine and hard liquor here) by a factor of two yielded significant changes in behavior. How significant? It's estimated that it would result in, among other things, a 35% reduction in alcohol-related deaths, a 6% reduction in sexually transmitted diseases and a 1.4% reduction in crime.

The study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which has a mission "to improve the health and health care of all Americans," and to "help our society transform itself for the better."

A press release from the Foundation cited Alexander C. Wagenaar, a professor of health outcomes and policy at the University of Florida College of Medicine, as saying that "increasing the price of alcohol will result in significant reductions in many of the undesirable outcomes associated with drinking." In fact, higher alcohol taxes were found to have a more significant impact on drinking than alcohol abuse prevention programs.

Others were not so sure. Lisa Hawkins, vice president of The Distilled Spirits Council, said: "Numerous studies, including research from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, show that alcohol abusers are the least sensitive to tax increases. It is the moderate, responsible consumer who cuts back the most when prices rise." She went on to say that, "according to government statistics, there is no relationship between alcohol excise tax rates and alcohol-related traffic fatalities."

It's an interesting question, for sure, whether an increase in alcohol taxes would affect heavy drinkers or merely moderate drinkers. The smoking industry has found that skyrocketing taxes on cigarettes has not eliminated the desire of many to continue smoking; perhaps the same will hold true for booze.

What is true, however, is that taxes on alcohol, like those on cigarettes and other products subject to "sin taxes," tend to be the easiest taxes to boost in a bad economy. The political fallout is not as immediate as, say, an increase in income taxes. This makes alcohol an easy target for revenue-raisers, a fact confirmed when you look at prices. According to The Distilled Spirits Council, federal, state, and local taxes accounted for $7.81, or 55%, of the average $14.13 price for a typical 750ml bottle of 80 proof distilled spirits in the United States in 2009. That's more than half. It makes you wonder exactly how high those taxes can go.

It's a difficult balance. On the one hand, the U.S. likes to think of itself as a country that allows you certain freedoms -- including the freedom to drink alcohol. However, the health concerns associated with drinking too much pose a threat to public health. The question of how to mesh the two clearly hasn't been resolved.

Russia, where alcohol-related deaths and illnesses are climbing at an alarming rate, seems to have found its peace with the issue, with Finance Minister Kudrin encouraging drinking as a means of keeping the economy going. Such a campaign would be met with controversy here in the U.S. -- but there's something to be said for Kudrin's honesty.

It's doubtful that this issue of how much to tax alcohol will be resolved anytime soon. The question, however, will continue to make headlines so long as the economy is struggling.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Intro to different retirement accounts

What does it mean to have a 401(k)? IRA?

View Course »

How Financial Planners go Grocery Shopping

Learn to shop smart and save.

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

Employer Sponsored Health Coverage Explained

The Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, is simpler than some people may give it credit for. The basic rule to remember is that everyone must carry Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) or pay a penalty. Employers with 50 full-time employees or more are obligated to sponsor plans for their workers to help them meet this requirement.

How to Report RSUs or Stock Grants on Your Tax Return

Restricted stock units (RSUs) and stock grants are often used by companies to reward their employees with an investment in the company rather than with cash. As the name implies, RSUs have rules as to when they can be sold. Stock grants often carry restrictions as well. How your stock grant is delivered to you, and whether or not it is vested, are the key factors when determining tax treatment.

What is a Schedule Q Form?

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has two very different forms that go by the name Schedule Q. One of them is for people who participate in certain real estate investments; this is known as a Form 1066 Schedule Q. The other Schedule Q deals with employer benefit plans. It?s not something an individual taxpayer would normally have to deal with, though a small business owner might need it.

Incentive Stock Options

Some employers use Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) as a way to attract and retain employees. While ISOs can offer a valuable opportunity to participate in your company's growth and profits, there are tax implications you should be aware of. We'll help you understand ISOs and fill you in on important timetables that affect your tax liability, so you can optimize the value of your ISOs.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum