There are those both outside and inside America who are rubbing their hands with glee at this nation's supposed collapse. That realization smacked me in the face Monday morning when I taped an interview with two economists -- one in Frankfurt and the other in Hong Kong -- for Russia's RTTV, scheduled to be broadcast seven times on Sept. 8. America, in their view, is so bankrupt that it has become irrelevant. One cites Ron Paul as the only U.S. politician who's in touch with this reality.

The premise of the RTTV segment was to explore whether America is heading into a double dip-recession. But if you enjoy watching sharks chomping at chum-filled pools of blood in the water, you'll want to watch this segment, because F.W. Engdahl, an American economic researcher living in Frankfurt, and Martin Hennecke, a German senior manager of private clients at Tyche who lives in Hong Kong, went on the attack against America.

America's failure, they say, came because the country is so loaded with government debt and running such a huge deficit that it's bankrupt. Engdahl believes that America had a chance to save itself in 2008 by letting Wall Street collapse. In his view, America sealed its doom by bailing out Wall Street.

Is America an Economic Basket Case?


Hennecke voiced the view -- echoed by Boston University professor Lawrence Kotlikoff -- that when you factor in the liabilities for Social Security and Medicare, our true national debt is $202 trillion, 15 times the official figure. He joins Engdahl in the belief that America has outsourced its brains and its manufacturing industries, leaving it nothing but a few agricultural commodities worth exporting to the rest of the world.

Among other things, Hennecke is certainly wrong on the facts of U.S. exports. According to the CIA World Fact Book, agricultural products constituted a relatively small proportion of 2009's $1.04 trillion worth of U.S. exports, which were distributed as follows:
  • Capital goods (transistors, aircraft, motor vehicle parts, computers, telecommunications equipment, etc.) 49%;
  • Industrial supplies (organic chemicals, etc.) 26.8%;
  • Consumer goods (automobiles, medicines, etc.) 15%; and
  • Agricultural products (soybeans, fruit, corn, etc.) 9.2%.
While I'm concerned about America's debt and deficit, and its economy's failure to rebound robustly, I don't share Engdahl and Hennecke's pessimism about America. In my view, the economy is still in the recession that began in December 2007, yet we have enjoyed economic growth since the summer of 2009 -- albeit not sufficient to create the 300,000 jobs a month needed to reduce our unemployment rate significantly.

How Will America Create Jobs?

In my view, America's greatest economic strength is its ability to take powerful new ideas and turn them into business ecosystems. That's a topic Babson College professor Srini Rangan and I addressed in our June 2010 book, Capital Rising: How Capital Flows Are Changing Business Systems All Over the World. Unfortunately, it has been about 10 years since the nation has been able to put that strength to use creating jobs.

We could achieve economic growth if we could create such ecosystems that would draw capital investment from the corporate sector into new technologies that boost business productivity. We achieved that goal in the 1960s (mainframes), 1970s (minicomputers), 1980s (networked PCs), and 1990s (Internet).

The Internet helped create 22.4 million jobs during the latter half of the 1990s. We haven't witnessed business investment in a technology of that job-spurring magnitude since -- but companies have accumulated $1.84 trillion in cash that they could invest if such an innovation emerged. It's up to engineers and scientists, collaborating with government, business, and investors to create it.

And if such technologies do emerge, a wave of successful initial public offerings would unlock venture capital to invest in them. But Engdahl and Hennecke don't believe there's any relevance to that view. Hennecke suggests that investors should avoid buying anything in America and should instead invest in gold, silver, and commodities. He sees Ron Paul and the Tea Party as the only people in the U.S. with the sense to realize that America's best days are behind it.

Engdahl sees opportunity for Russia and other countries that control natural resources to sell their commodities to China, which in his view is the only possible source of global growth.

Are you with those who believe that America is economically irrelevant? If so, where are you investing? If not, what do you think will spur a revival of American growth?

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Basics of Diversification

Learn one of the fundamental concepts of building a portfolio.

View Course »

Socially Responsible Investing

Invest in companies with a conscience.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

5 Comments

Filter by:
Robert

I totally agree. The 80's and 90's were fueled by the cell phone, GPS, personal computer and microchip power, and the Internet. 1945 thru 1965 was chemicals: fibers, plastics, etc. The 70's and 00's had no innovations to speak of and were lost decades. The next ecosystem will be biotech as targeted medicines developed through greater knowledge of human chromosomes and computing power that will mitigate or eliminate cancers, flus, common cold, AIDS and hereditary diseases. And America does this very well! Coming soon!

September 07 2010 at 4:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
some1do

America is in denial. Crash will go into history books. Great Depression is going to pale compared to the coming crash. A nation cannot prosper by borrowing and spending on granite counter tops. We need to invest in our productive capacity to create real value. However there is no demand. That is because entire developed world is in debt. We have already borrowed all we can from the future. The future is here. We cannot expect that all will be fine when the pay back time arrives. They say: "but companies have accumulated $1.84 trillion in cash that they could invest if such an innovation emerged". This cash is already invested in bonds and other instruments and has already been used in the economy. It is not sitting idle under the pillow. We have borrowed, inflated the money supply and the prices and salaries with borrowed money. Now debt is deflating. It will deflate until we wipe out old debt and start fresh again. http://www.tradingstocks.net/html/inflation_deflation_credit_bub.html

September 07 2010 at 2:46 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Wendy

WHAT?!!? After all those years under the Bush Regime, we have a lot of digging to get out. America has a lot more going for it than just one thing! We have HEART, we have RESILIENCE, we have HOPE, and we have OBAMA. Let the games begin.

September 07 2010 at 2:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
wolfml1

Economics is not an exact science, in fact, it is close to weather prediction. If you get 10 Economists in a room you get 11 different predictions. The first thing America has to do is create more US jobs, which means, tax incentives for creating jobs in the US, tax penalties for moving jobs out of the US. Secondly, we need to get rid of all the politicians who just want a job while doing nothing in that job, both Democrats and Republicans who are just interested in getting reelected and collecting a paycheck instead of legislating need to be voted out. Those Politicians who are interested in promoting their own style of morality, whatever that may be, also need gone. Only those individuals, and they can have differing views, that are willing to work towards a compromise to get something done should be in office, Newt out, Palin out, Huckabee out, Boehner out, McConnell out, Pelosi out, Reid out. Cut the crap and get to work.

September 07 2010 at 12:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tjcnopops2

Finance knows no nationality. The real cause of our economic demise is the Empire fever our great leaders have persued overtly for 50 years and covertly for twice that length of time. All of our financial problems would disappear if we weren't policing the entire world with our military.

September 07 2010 at 12:07 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply