legal briefingA daily look at legal news and the business of law:

Obama Sides with Utilities over States in Climate Change Case

Eight states, New York City and three groups persuaded the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to allow them to sue greenhouse-gas emitting utilities as a public nuisance, a major victory based in part on the Environmental Protection Agency's failure to regulate carbon dioxide. The utilities appealed to the Supreme Court, and their efforts to persuade the Court to hear the case and overturn the decision got a big boost when the Obama administration joined their effort, filing a brief urging the Court to take the case, vacate the decision and send it back to the Second Circuit.

Because the Supreme Court hears a small fraction of the appeals made to it, and because Solicitors General have a significant influence on the Court, the Obama administration brief is a big help to the utilities. Because the administration could have stayed out of the fight rather than pick sides, an attorney for the plaintiffs said, "We feel stabbed in the back...With friends like this, who needs enemies?" An attorney for the utilities crowed elatedly, "We're certainly happy with it...They could have stayed silent. The fact that they've spoken out is significant, and we're happy about it."

The Obama administration argues that since the opinion was issued, the EPA has begun regulating carbon dioxide, and one national system of regulation is better than letting appeals courts set differing standards in different parts of the country.

Interestingly, the plaintiffs may agree that judicial regulation is not good policy per se. The threat of lawsuits and the hodgepodge regulation that would result could nonetheless be a strategic hammer to force Congress to enact comprehensive climate-change regulation. Congress has already shown it lacks the will to take such action, but perhaps with industry clamoring for rules to override judicial decisions, Congress would find the strength to act.

As if the states didn't have enough to be upset about, law professor Jonathan Zasloff calls the administration's brief "worse than you think" because it argues for more than necessary to help the utilities, and if the Supreme Court adopts its view it will make it harder for states to file similar suits in the future.

FCC Wants its Indecency Rules Back

The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently struck down the Federal Communication Commission's fleeting expletive indecency rules. Rather than simply accept the decision, the FCC has asked the court to reconsider or to have the full court, rather than a panel of three judges, decide the case anew.

I'm sure the FCC's preference would be for the full court to hear it, as the panel has already ruled against the FCC twice in the case, striking down the fleeting expletive policy both times, most recently because it was unconstitutionally "vague". Whatever the Second Circuit does, the case is likely to go back to the Supreme Court, which will likely to strike down the policy.

Clemens Arraignment Set for Aug. 30

Roger Clemens will face a judge for the first time in his perjury case on Monday, when Clemens is arraigned before Judge Reggie Walton of the D.C. District Court, reports the Blog of the Legal Times. Undoubtedly Clemens will plead not guilty. His trial isn't expected to start until next spring.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Goal Setting

Want to succeed? Then you need goals!

View Course »

Timing Your Spending

How to pay less by changing when you purchase.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

Is this part of the socialist agenda that the righties have been screaming about? Obama is republican lite.

August 28 2010 at 8:51 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to otterdad48's comment

We have an economy in deep trouble, millions who have lost their jobs, and now we have States suing utilities over greenhouse-gas emissions? This is so stupid to do at this time. I am against nearly all of the Obama policies, but I support him on this issue. We do not need more job losses at this time.

August 27 2010 at 6:00 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Obama and his administration have lost my support. That was it. First Gitmo is still open, then re authorizing the Patriot Act, now turning his back on state efforts to control pollution. Might as well be Bush. Either way they make me sick. Hope and change is now Hype and dismay.

August 27 2010 at 12:14 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply