Stossel Defamation Ruling Gives Shirley Sherrod a Legal Leg to Stand On

A federal appeals court ruled to allow a defamation case against TV news de-bunker John Stossel to move forward -- a ruling that could mean bad news for conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart, who posted a tightly-edited segment of a speech by Department of Agriculture employee Shirley Sherrod that made it sound as if she were confessing to racist acts.

The Stossel case revolves around a 2007 report on ABC's 20/20 about televangelist Rev. Frederick Price. In painting Price as a greedy braggart, Stossel used a video clip that appeared to show him boasting about his vast material wealth. The clip was actually a portion of a sermon in which Price preached against greed by adopting the character of a wealthy man.

Price's defamation suit against Stossel was initially disallowed on the grounds that Stossel used the misleading clip to make an accurate point -- that Price is extremely rich. But the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that "the context in which Price's words were presented materially changed the words' meaning." The question now turns to whether Stossel (who now works for Fox Business Network) and his producers knew they were misrepresenting the nature of the clip. If so, Price will be able to argue that their actions constituted "actual malice," something that public figures must establish to prove defamation.

Price's saga neatly parallels the tribulations endured by Sherrod, who delivered a speech to the NAACP about the personal transformation that allowed her to leave behind her youthful hostility toward and distrust of white people. By editing the video clip of her speech, Breitbart made it appear as though Sherrod was bragging about having denied help to a white farmer while working for the federal government. Sherrod says she plans to sue, and it should be easy enough for her to establish damages, since Breitbart's posting quickly led to her firing. (Sherrod recently turned down an offer of a new job at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.)

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Introduction to Preferred Shares

Learn the difference between preferred and common shares.

View Course »

How to Avoid Financial Scams

Avoid getting duped by financial scams.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:


August 26 2010 at 8:15 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

How much you want to bet Stossel gets the case thrown out.....

August 25 2010 at 2:12 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Being a Libertariosn, the focus of many Stossel stories is on PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY and ACCOUNTABILITY, or lack thereof. He has accurately pointed out that we live in a winny, poor me, the world owes me a living society where someone's bad luck or fate is caused by society. If his journalism hits a raw nerve by portraying life as it is - then so be it! Fact of the matter, we better all "cowboy up" and learn to be self-sufficient or we will be in worse shape than we already are.

August 25 2010 at 1:34 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Richard's comment

What is a "Libertariosn' and how would one pronounce it?

August 25 2010 at 3:00 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Hopefully Price can nail Stossel - and, someone needs to. I was once a faithful 20/20 watcher, but I think it was around late 2002 or early 2003 I noticed Stossel started doing some odd stories and they centered on the job market where towns were starting to get hit as jobs moved out. His "get a life" attitude toward some of those folks as the towns were dying out blew me away. He'd find a few that found a job they liked more and then chew down on the majority that couldn't find work and he got so bad I just about forgot 20/20 was on the air, but I was glad finding out he headed to Fox. Price is a good man and he's not going to bring it up if it's not true. I hope this one can put Stossel in his place.

August 25 2010 at 1:21 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply