InvestorCenter

GM CEO Whitacre Puts a Damper on IPO Speculation

GM IPO General Motors' anticipated initial public offering remained up in the air Thursday, according to the Wall Street Journal. "We're not there yet," CEO Ed Whitacre told a reporter at an industry conference in Traverse City, Mich. "I don't know when, I don't know how," he said.

Speculation has run rampant in recent weeks that GM would file papers to begin an initial public offering this month, giving the company ample time to complete the stock sale by the fall midterm elections.

The company and the Obama administration have come under fire from critics who say GM -- as well as Chrysler -- shouldn't have been bailed out by the federal government last year, following the near-collapse of financial markets in late 2008. Offloading the government's share -- and minimizing any loss from the sale -- could help Democrats in their bids for reelection.

In April, GM completed payment of nearly $7 billion dollars in cash that it received from Treasury. GM still owes the government about $43 billion, which could be repaid by the sale of GM stock. The federal government owns about 60% of GM, leading some to deridingly refer to the company as "government motors."

Whitacre also said Thursday that the Detroit-based automaker would discuss CEO succession "at the right time." Whitacre took over the top post at GM on a temporary basis when former CEO Fritz Henderson was ousted late last year. Whitacre, the 68-year-old former chief of AT&T (T), was appointed permanent CEO in January.

Given his age, however, there has been speculation that Whitacre isn't long for the position, and that a search for new chief executive may begin sooner rather than later.

Learn about investing from the comfort of your own home.

Portfolio Basics

Take the first steps to building your portfolio.

View Course »

Investment Strategies

Learn the strategies you need to build a winning portfolio

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

65 Comments

Filter by:
Randy

The government owns 60% of GM! Where's the other 40%? Is that the graft, payola, or kickbacks the O'Bama turned over to the Union Leaders for helping get him elected? Radical Leftist Democrats are always quick to talk about Corporate Bonuses and Executive Salaries. I ask, what about the Mega Wealthy Lavish Living Union Bosses who are getting huge salaries, graft, kickbacks from guys like O'Bama, and even hardworking taxpayer dollars?

August 06 2010 at 8:32 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
dalea158

I see Glen Beck bad mouths GM whenever he can. The plant that GM built in mexico is a prime example why the free north america trade agreement was a disater from the get go. Please don't tell me Beck was not for that trade agreement, most conseratives were for it. Thanks Glen for the double talk, again!!!

August 05 2010 at 10:46 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
cmp1996

How about the guy in the White House and his minions trampling over the bankruptcy laws and giving the unions the shares that rightfully should belong to the secured creditors -- at least they used to be secured creditors -- until the marxist assumed the throne.

August 05 2010 at 7:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
veasystreet

My point is that if you are going to come on this site and post statistics and factoids make sure that they are (1) true and (2) tell the whole story not just your prejudiced side of the argument. When GM supporters do not tell the whole story about the American Auto market, people tend to think that they are being fed a bill of goods, like Whiteacre and his statement about paying off GM loans five years ahead of schedule. This $500 million dollar GM investment in a Mexican production facility is a fine example, thank God for the Detroit Free Press, although they didn't play it up they did report it. Will O'Bama go to Mexico for the ribbon cutting ceremony?

August 05 2010 at 7:04 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
veasystreet

tomozzy: Germnay was never a threat? Volkswagen had a sales increase of 17.1% last month and BMW's was 10.3% The Big 3's market share of vehicles sold in the U.S. last month was below 45%. That means there were more foreign nameplates sold than domestic nameplates. Why is GM & Ford still 1 and 2? Because there are so many brands to choose from. And that is what the American people have come to love. The days of GM will build it and they will come are over. GM and Ford will have to hustle hard to MAINTAIN what they have in the U.S. Even with brand loyalty! That is sad

August 05 2010 at 6:46 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
brhurdle

I'm sorry but I am offended by the way that the Feds treated people who held GM debt. The last straw was the Whitacre statement about paying back the $7 B which was a totally bogus transaction - it was an obvious attempt at deception. I have been a lifelong GM customer with the purchase of 8 Chevys, 5 Pontiacs and 1 Buick vs 4 Fords. However, I will no longer purchase GM products and will convert exclusively to Ford.

August 05 2010 at 6:42 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
veasystreet

People throw stastics around without actually interpreting the result, they are parrots, just passing on what they have learned. Here is July 2010 sales increases/(decreases) over June 2010. When you finished reading the list remember the previous post of Chevy's core brands (whatever that is) of +24% increase and Toyota's drop of 8% (decrease). Here you go: The Big 3: GM +5.2%; Ford +3.3%; Chrysler +5.05. Here are the foreign name plates (I only cite losses and gains over 10%): Toyota (-3.2%); Honda (-2.0%); Nissan +14.6%; Volkswagen +17.1%; Mitsubishi +16.5%; Hundai +18.0%; BMW +10.3%; Kia +20.7%. Kinda proves that figures don't lie but liars figure.

August 05 2010 at 6:35 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
veasystreet

SBHH: Those statistics, which are gratifying to read are misleading. If you look at overall sales of vehicles for July 2010 over June 2010 you will see that foreign nameplates sold almost 31,000 more VEHICLES (auto and light trucks) in July 2010, the Big 3 sold over 21,000 more. Toyota and Honda fell in the sales race but was more than offset by booming months for Nissan, Hyundai and Kia. Over all marketshare in July 2010 fell one tenth of one percent from JUNE 2009. You can pick any part of the sales figure and play up what looks good and what looks bad, but when you look at the whole picture, overall foreign sales outpaced domestic sales by a slim margin. I would not place a lot of value on AOL headlines, do your own research as I do then you can speak from knowledge, not what you hear down at the Union Hall.

August 05 2010 at 6:14 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
lskrcpilot

Sure would like to know if G.M will make good on the $7500 worth of stock they stole from me to give to the Obama Administration and UAW. Shouldn't I be given back those shares before they sell a new offering to complete strangers. I am getting even however. Ever since they shut me out I've been lobbying against anyone buying a GM vehicle.I wont be happy until I've concinced enough people to buy anything but GM and that figure surpasses one million dollars. Progress is good so far and I will meet that goal. That's a promise...LK

August 05 2010 at 6:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
veasystreet

To bassmaster: I misread your post. You are stating that imports (cars assembled in foreign countries) do not pay social security unemployment and other taxes in the U.S. That would seem to be true to me. That raises the questions of American nameplates made in Mexico, Canada and other foreign countries. Do they withhold social security taxes and enemployment in those countries and send the money to U.S.? I do not know.

August 05 2010 at 6:02 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply