BP Caps Well, but Faces Gusher of Criticism Over Claims

    Posted 6:45AM 07/13/10 Posted under: Energy, Company News, BP
    BP (BP) successfully placed a new containment cap over the damaged Deepwater Horizon well in the Gulf of Mexico Monday night, and over the next 48 hours will run tests to determine if the cap can successfully stem the flow of oil.

    The company began running safety checks Tuesday morning to make sure dangerous pressure that could cause leaks in other parts of the damaged well will not build as valves on the new cap are slowly closed. Analysts have warned that shutting off the gushing oil too quickly could cause an explosion.

    National Incident Commander Admiral Thad Allen said the tests "will provide valuable information about the condition of the well below the sea level and help determine whether or not it is possible to shut the well for a period of time, such as during a hurricane or bad weather, between now and when the relief wells are complete." The testing will last between six and 48 hours initially, but could go on longer if necessary. Since this sealing cap system has never been used on a deepwater well before, BP said total containment of the oil could not be assured.

    BP also said that the collection of oil from the well by the Discoverer Enterprise and Q4000 vessels would have to stop during the testing, meaning the roughly 25,000 barrels of oil a day they've been capturing would be released into the Gulf. However, once the testing is complete, a third oil-collection system connected to the Helix Producer will be added to the effort, which could then collect anywhere from 35,000 to 60,000 barrels of oil a day. A fourth collection system could increase oil capture to 60,000 to 80,000 barrels a day.

    Relief Wells on Schedule but Claim Payments Way Behind


    Meanwhile, the company reported that work on the two relief wells that are seen as the main option for completely closing the damaged well remains on schedule. Over the weekend, the lead driller rig for the relief wells came within a few hundred feet of the point where it will try to re-bore into the well so that it can be cemented closed. The target date for completion of the first relief well is mid-August.

    Unfortunately, relief for local businesses affected by the spill cannot come fast enough as criticism of BP's claims process intensified on Monday. The company said it had received as many as 105,000 claims, but half of them had not been processed. In a statement, the company said it had made more than 52,000 payments to residents totaling almost $165 million. Gulf residents accuse BP of requiring extremely detailed paperwork and seizing on any small omission to deny claims. The company maintains that it has cut down the time it takes to approve claims.

    Add a Comment

    *0 / 3000 Character Maximum

    1 Comment

    Filter by:
    Kelly Nelson

    There was a non toxic Alternative to clean up the spill that has been successfully tested by BP after 10 months of spill damages. The Coast Guard sent a letter from headquarters stating to the FOSC to take action with OSE II, and the EPA, Lisa Jackson stopped the Coast Guard from allowing BP from implementing OSE II. In fact the EPA stopped the application of OSE II 11 times denying State Senators direct request for use of OSE II from Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. La Department of environmental requested the use of OSE II as well, EPA's Sam Coleman denied their request without reason. Governor Jindal tried to get OSE II demonstrated on the Chandelier Islands on May 6, 2010, and the EPA stopped the Governor as well. The EPA in fact stopped the use of OSE II 11 times, without a reason given. Had the EPA allowed Governor Jindal to allow the demonstration of OSE II on May 6, 2010, it is possible a significant portion of the environmental damages, including the shorelines and the seafood industry would have been spared. The toxicty test comparison between OSE II and corexit really cannot be compared since with corexit, the label states it can cause red blood cells to burst, kidney, and liver problems if a chemical suit and respirator are not worn. OSE II in contrast can be used to wash your hands and is non toxic. The BP Deep Horizon spill has proven that corexit only sinks oil and causes the same oil to be addressed a second time when it comes ashore as under water plumes, or tar balls, while OSE II has a substantiated end point of converting oil to CO2 and water. See Coast Guard letter below


    U. S. Department
    of Homeland Security
    United States
    Coast Guard

    Commanding Officer 1 Chelsea Street
    U. S. Coast Guard New London, CT 06320
    Research and Development Center Staff Symbol: Contracting Office
    Phone: (860) 271-2807

    July 10, 2010

    OSEI Corporation
    P.O. Box 515429
    Dallas, TX 75251

    Attn: Steven Pedigo, President/Owner

    DEEPWATER HORIZON RESPONSE BAA HSCG32-10-R-R00019, TRACKING #2003954

    We are pleased to inform you that the initial screening of your White Paper submitted under Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HSCG32-10-R-R00019 has been completed. It has been determined that your White Paper submission has a potential for benefit to the spill response effort.

    Your White Paper has been forwarded to the Deepwater Horizon Response Federal On-Scene Coordinator (FOSC) for further action under its authority. Subject to the constraints and needs of the ongoing oil spill response, you may be contacted by the FOSC or the responsible party.


    We appreciate your interest in supporting the Deepwater Horizon Response effort.


    Contracting Officer /s/
    USCG R&D Center

    December 02 2011 at 4:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply