Why My Website Is Ditching Adobe's Flash

    Posted 9:53AM 06/02/10 Posted under: Technology, Columns, Apple, Adobe Systems
    I recently wrote an article for DailyFinance about how Apple's (AAPL) refusal to allow Adobe's (ADBE) Flash rich media-language to run on the iPhone or iPad has made the language much less attractive to developers and companies.

    Now, I've lived it.

    In my day job, I am in charge of Web development for a green-tech company. And when we decided it was time to refresh our home page, one thing that our developer and I agreed on was to remove Flash from it -- and eventually, from other parts of the site.

    Why? Because many of our employees and customers use iPhones. As it stood, the several Flash components on our home page either showed up as blank spaces on iPhones, or didn't provide the content we really wanted to deliver. We also anticipated a time when customers, the media, industry analysts and others would be viewing our pages on iPads -- perhaps even more so than on iPhones.

    In other words, we had to future-proof our site by removing Flash.

    Why Bother?

    Certainly, we're not alone in seeing it this way. Sure, you can use Flash and HTML 5 graphic components in tandem in a way that would show up fine on Apple devices. But why bother? It costs extra money, and the two scripting languages are increasingly similar in their capabilities to deliver very rich, browser-based content including multimedia and mini-applications.

    And my wariness about Flash didn't stop at our home page. Another task I'd been given was to look for a decent Webinar software-as-a-service provider as we ramp up that aspect of our marketing effort. Guess what? A lot of these tools are built using Flash. Unfortunately, this cast a shadow over these tools, because I was unsure whether potential customers and dealers would be logging in to future Webinars using iPhones or iPads. For that reason, I was willing to consider only Webinar services not built on the Flash platform.

    Am I the only marketing executive who's thinking like this right now? Hardly. What's more, this type of logic will continue to color my decision-making unless Apple relents and allows Flash on the iPad and the iPhone. The impact of my thinking -- and the similar thinking of people at millions of other businesses -- will really start to show up only in a year or two. That's when application development now in planning stages comes to fruition largely sans Flash, which now looks more and more like a mere flash in the pan.

    Add a Comment

    *0 / 3000 Character Maximum

    1 Comment

    Filter by:
    Paul

    I read your article with interest, Alex I'm a web developer at a University and much of the materials on the site I'm working on is delivered as flash swf files. We have a similar problem, we know a lot of people will be accessing our site with iPhones and iPads but I'm not sure if I agree with your belief that removing Flash now is a good idea, especially if you have many assets already in Flash. Android is improving and don't forget that Android phones are *much* cheaper than iPhones. Most people can't afford an iPhone (why spend $1200 for an iPhone 4 when you can buy a IDEOS for a quarter of that price? Flash is a well established player in web development and is not a 'Flash in the pan' simply because it's been around for nearly 15 years and there are so many assets already in this format that to remove it would be folly. It's a much better idea to provide alternate content for iPhone users, similar to the SWF content you are replacing, where possible, otherwise you end up locking out those that don't use iPhones which is still and will continue to be a substantial number of people. I don't have a crystal ball but I'm willing to bet that the Android alternatives will start gaining market share simply because they are affordable and accessible, just like Firefox pushed out IE and Opera in the browser arena.

    June 29 2011 at 11:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply