- Days left
Ready, set, action!Ever wonder why so many television series are filmed in New York or Vancouver, Canada? Well, you'd shoot there too, if they offered you the cornucopia of cash savings that these areas do. Why? Because most states and some countries embrace the common wisdom that television productions bring big bucks to the local economy. This is also why the host locations for two major television series (Law and Order in New York City, Lost in Hawaii) are singing the blues as these two series come to an end.

Hard numbers about the economic loss are difficult to come by (more about that later), but, according to Bizjournals, Hawaii estimates that Lost pumped $400 million into the state's coffers during its six-season run. It reportedly employed more than 2,000 people in the last shooting year, and bought airliners-full of food, paint, wood, and other set supplies as well as renting fleets of vehicles and paying for lodging.

The original Law & Order brought New York City approximately $1 billion during its 20-year run, according to the Mayor's Office of Film, Theater and Broadcasting as reported by New York Magazine.

Given these juicy figures, it's no wonder that 41 states, numerous local communities and other countries now offer financial incentives for American TV and movie productions. In a game of one-upmanship, these entities vie by offering rebates on local labor, sales tax, production venues and services, as well as cooperation in getting access to venues.

Obviously, the wisdom of extending such largess to the industry depends on measuring the return. Do these towns, states and countries eventually recoup the lost tax revenue from the local companies that benefited from the increase in business? If not, does the production provide jobs, or does the money it spends recirculate enough to offset the investment?

Not according to a recent paper by professor Susan Christopherson of Cornell University and Ned Rightor of MXCIX. They point out that good measurements of this economic impact are almost impossible to find. Those people in the business of promoting film bureaus find them using ephemeral mulitpliers to "prove" that the tax breaks were justified, while other branches of a state government, such as the tax collectors who run their own numbers, find just the opposite.

The pair cites a Connecticut government study that found that 8% of the money invested came back to the state as tax revenue. Another study in Louisiana found revenue returns were only 16-18% of the money paid out. The Wisconsin Department of Commerce published a study using the Johnny Depp movie Public Enemies, filmed in the state. It concluded that it cost the state $925,467 of incentive money for each job created. Shortly thereafter, the state ended the program.

Christopherson and Rightor also point out that many of the jobs created are transitory, gone as soon as the production ends, and that to secure repeated business, states and communities would need specialized support such as sound stages and video-savvy labor. How can the latter be maintained if the business is episodic? With state support?

There is a certain pride a community can derive from seeing itself featured in a movie or television program. As a job creation and economic development initiative, however, proponents my have gotten Lost in the numbers, and passed laws that are bringing disorder to local budgets.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Advice for Recent College Grads

Prepare yourself for the "real world".

View Course »

Banking Services 101

Understand your bank's services, and how to get the most from them

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

Employer Sponsored Health Coverage Explained

The Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, is simpler than some people may give it credit for. The basic rule to remember is that everyone must carry Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) or pay a penalty. Employers with 50 full-time employees or more are obligated to sponsor plans for their workers to help them meet this requirement.

How to Report RSUs or Stock Grants on Your Tax Return

Restricted stock units (RSUs) and stock grants are often used by companies to reward their employees with an investment in the company rather than with cash. As the name implies, RSUs have rules as to when they can be sold. Stock grants often carry restrictions as well. How your stock grant is delivered to you, and whether or not it is vested, are the key factors when determining tax treatment.

What is a Schedule Q Form?

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has two very different forms that go by the name Schedule Q. One of them is for people who participate in certain real estate investments; this is known as a Form 1066 Schedule Q. The other Schedule Q deals with employer benefit plans. It?s not something an individual taxpayer would normally have to deal with, though a small business owner might need it.

Incentive Stock Options

Some employers use Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) as a way to attract and retain employees. While ISOs can offer a valuable opportunity to participate in your company's growth and profits, there are tax implications you should be aware of. We'll help you understand ISOs and fill you in on important timetables that affect your tax liability, so you can optimize the value of your ISOs.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum