Solar, Wind Power Trouble: Green Renewable Energy May Destablize Electrical Grid Boy, that was fast. Only five years into the world's renewable energy push, many utility companies are so concerned about grid instability that they're saying they can't accept any more electricity from intermittent sources of power. Translation: Solar power only runs in the day time and can't re relied on for so called "baseload" capacity. Wind power primarily produces current at night and, likewise, can't be relied upon for baseload capacity. Geothermal, meanwhile, is perfect for providing baseload. But geothermal projects take an excruciatingly long time to build out. And then there have been the recent spate of earthquake scares around geothermal sites.

The upshot: Utilities such as Hawaiian Electric in President Obama's home state are voicing concerns about plans to integrate more solar and wind power into the grid until they develop methods to more effectively absorb intermittent sources of power without destabilizing the whole shebang. In Europe, Czech utility companies are concerned that "feed-in tariffs," which require power companies to repurchase all home- and business-generated renewable power at elevated rates, might wreak havoc on the Central European grid.

This growing push-back from utilities could prove to be shock to energy project developers, lawmakers and homeowners. In the U.S., project developers and state lawmakers have assumed that the ambitious laws mandating as much as 40% of some states' power come from renewable sources within the next few decades would ensure huge demand for green power as utilities scaled up their use of such resources from low single-digit levels. Likewise, homeowners have tended to assume that if they could put a panel on their roof (or a windmill on their property), they would be guaranteed a market for the extra power produced.

Storing Excess Power in Ice, Salt or Even ... Caves

The ability to sell back power to a utility at retail rates (meaning the rates they charge the public) is dubbed "net metering," and many states have limitations on what percentage of total baseload power on a grid a utility must buy back. It was broadly assumed net metering would go away in hurry when the Green Revolution came of age. Now, that appears unlikely. The alleged problems with absorbing intermittent green power point to a more fundamental issue with the existing power grid -- namely, that the system isn't really ready to handle a significantly more distributed power production footprint.

One possible remedy would be for utilities to build more power storage systems, and many new forms for those are on the drawing boards. One solution could be massive battery installations from the likes of A123 Systems. Another could be a system such as that offered by Ice Energy, which uses cheap power at night to make ice, reducing the power requirements of air conditioning systems in the daytime. This effectively arbitrages the price differential between nighttime and daytime power generation -- something that potentially could be a huge boon for wind power. Other, more exotic "battery" systems that have been proposed include storing power in molten salt or injecting compressed air into sealed caves, both of which create potential energy that can later be used to power electric generators.

Power storage is already being recognized as essential to new renewable energy projects. A wind farm on Maui will be the first in the country to have an added power storage component in the form of a bank of lithium-ion batteries. But most green power developers are still having trouble competing with coal and natural gas fired plants on a level playing field -- even without adding in the costs of power storage. If the issues of dealing with intermittent power sources are as disruptive to grid stability as some traditional utilities are claiming, the Green Revolution may be a case of "too much, too soon" -- at least until the engineers can figure out better, cheaper ways to capture sunshine and wind in a bottle.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

How much house can I afford

Home buying 101, evaluating one of your most important financial decisions.

View Course »

Investing in Emerging Markets

Learn to invest in a globalized world.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

1 Comment

Filter by:

Unreliable energy is actually causing more unreliability for current reliable energy producers. If these companies don't have money coming in, how are they going to fund repairs and upgrades to the current fleet of reliable generation? You are expecting these reliable generation companies to staff, 24 hours per day generating plants with people who will be sitting around playing cards till the phone call comes in to power up because a Wind or Solar Farm can't meet its directive to produce. this is insane, and its happening all over the place. In the winter or spring the generation market is depressed because there is no room for more energy, no air conditioning, etc. So Wind energy being fleeting at best, but more importantly only productive 10% of the time. Comes on-line due to wind conditions and floods an already depressed grid situation with unneeded, and unreliable energy form. Further driving the price of energy skyrocketing downwards. This past summer, July, you couldn't get a popcorn fart of energy out of the wind turbines when you needed it the most during the heat wave of summer. Again, when you need it, wind power is nowhere to be found, unreliable. Yet, liberal eco-social activists are pushing more and more, guess who "Wind Power" more into the mix of Grid energy. Further pushing reliable generation into the Red of losses and closure situations.
We just cannot afford more eco-friendly social activists getting involved in the public government agencies like Energy or Environment Departments. Reliability and price are out the window for Eco-activists, and so is the Grid market price.

August 27 2011 at 2:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply