- Days left

Federal estate tax deadline looms

When Congress passed the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act (EGTRRA), many championed the "repeal" of the federal estate tax. What wasn't widely advertised at the time was that the repeal was for a single year. That single year of repeal begins in 10 days.

Under the terms of EGTRRA, the federal estate tax exemption amount increased from $675,000 in 2001 to $3.5 million in the current year, 2009. As the exemption amount increased, the top federal estate tax rate decreased. In 2010, for one year, there is a repeal. If no further action is taken, the federal estate tax will "sunset" to its original provisions beginning in 2011.


A brief snapshot of the changes to the exemption amount and tax rates appears as follows:

Year Exemption Amount Top Tax Rate
2001 -- $675,000 -- 55%
2002 -- $1 million -- 50%
2003 -- $1 million -- 49%
2004 -- $1.5 million -- 48%
2005 -- $1.5 million -- 47%
2006 -- $2 million -- 46%
2007 -- $2 million -- 45%
2008-- $2 million -- 45%
2009 -- $3.5 million -- 45%
2010 -- *Repealed * -- 0% *
2011 -- $1 million -- 55%

Of course, when EGTRRA passed, most tax practitioners believed that Congress would change it, one way or the other. The GOP vowed to make the repeal permanent but found themselves unable to push through any related legislation. When Democrats won both the House of Representatives and the Senate in 2006, they claimed that they would extend the bill, but three years later, they still haven't managed to do so.

In other words, absolutely nothing has happened in nearly 10 years.

Many wonder what the big deal would be if the federal estate tax was allowed to disappear for one year and return in 2011 as planned. Unfortunately, there's quite a bit to worry about.

First, there is the nightmare of basis adjustments. Currently, the Tax Code allows for a "step up" in basis on assets held at death. With no federal estate tax in place, the basis rules for assets become very complicated: the stepped up basis at death rules will be repealed and replaced with modified carryover basis. Estate administrators will be required to track the cost basis of the decedent's assets which eventually pass to beneficiaries, a difficult job at best. In addition to a rigid reporting scheme, the new rules for carry-over basis could mean taxpayers who otherwise might not have been subject to the federal estate tax will be subject to capital gains tax.

The new system would also mean additional tax forms, revamped IRS audit procedures and possibly, new IRS software. These are expensive and complex administrative changes for a system that is currently slated to be in place for just one year. It's perhaps not the best use of taxpayer money to spend more money to administer a new, temporary tax scheme.

Additionally, the year-long gap in the federal estate tax could lead to another problem: extensive litigation. Tax professionals agree that it's practically impossible to craft a foolproof plan for the repeal and resurgence of the federal estate tax. Wills that were written before 2001 may prove to be outdated and may contain provisions that create tax-savings trusts that are not needed or that are insufficient; wills that were written anticipating that the estate tax would be extended may face a similar fate. Beneficiaries are likely to resist many of the protections meant to save them from a tax that may not even exist.

According to the non-partisan think tank, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, under the current rules, only the largest 1 in 500 estates pay any tax. In other words, 99.8% of estates are not affected by the federal estate tax at all. If no action is taken by Congress, the federal estate tax rates will increase and personal exemption rates will drop. This means that more taxpayers will be affected, either by the federal estate tax or by the capital gains tax.

It's clear that inaction is not a solution. The House has managed to pass a compromise bill but the Senate will likely not do anything until 2010 -- and then only in the form of a retroactive bill. Temporary repeal, new rules, retroactive bills -- that's not a tax system. It's a mess.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Timing Your Spending

How to pay less by changing when you purchase.

View Course »

Getting out of debt

Everyone hates debt. Get out of it.

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

Depreciation of Business Assets

In an effort to stimulate the economy by encouraging businesses to buy new assets, Congress approved special depreciation and expensing rules for property acquired in 2014. However, beginning in 2015, we are back to the old depreciation rules.

Tax Deduction Wisdom - Should You Itemize?

Learn whether itemizing your deductions makes sense, or if you should simply take the no-questions-asked standard deduction. The standard deduction is always easier, but for one out of every four taxpayers, itemizing pays off with a lower tax bill. Browse this quick tax deduction overview to avoid paying more taxes than you actually owe.

Tax Breaks and Home Ownership

Home ownership brings with it not only many trips to home improvement stores, but also a slew of tax breaks. It's up to you to take full advantage of the write-offs available to you. Here's what you can and can't deduct.

When to Use Tax Form 1099-C for Cancellation of Debt

In most situations, if you receive a Form 1099-C from a lender after negotiating a debt cancellation with them, you'll have to report the amount on that form to the Internal Revenue Service as taxable income. Certain exceptions do apply.

What is IRS Form 8917?

If you, your spouse or dependents attended post-secondary school, you may be able to deduct a portion of the tuition and fees by reporting it on IRS Form 8717.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum