Is NASA still the best use of US tax dollars?
byNov 30th 2009 5:00PM
- $5.78 billion for space shuttle and International Space Station projects, equivalent to London's original estimated cost of hosting the 2012 Olympic Games
- $577 million for heliophysics, the study of the sun and its effect on the solar system, equaling the amount of Missouri transportation projects to be funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
- $447 million for aeronautics research, matching the deficit currently facing Texas' unemployment compensation fund
- $173 million for entrepreneurs to develop commercial transport capabilities to the International Space Station, equaling the USDA's total estimated cost of providing food,shelter and other necessities to 847 middle-income U.S. children for 18 years
Here's a breakdown of the $1.1 billion in cost overruns plaguing NASA's key projects, and what that money could procure elsewhere:
- Mars Science Laboratory: Costs have risen $657.4 million since October 2007. That's equivalent to the gross domestic product of Grenada, according to the 2008 CIA World Factbook.
- NPOESS Preparatory Project: Since October 2006, the price tag for NASA's satellite to study atmospheric and sea temperatures has ballooned $121.8 million, or the amount New York Gov. David Paterson proposed to save in a December budget plan by deferring five days pay until state workers end their employment or the state's dismal financial situation allows repayment.
- Kepler: NASA's spacecraft designed to discover Earth-like planets, launched last month from Cape Canaveral after a nine-month delay and a $97 million increase in costs, or the amount Oregon lawmakers hope to save in the state's budget by asking unionized state workers to agree to 24 unpaid furlough days in 2009-11.
- Glory: Costs for the agency's $347 million global warming satellite have increased since October 2007 by $81.8 million, or the amount of cuts facing Florida's nursing homes amid the state's $6.1 billion shortfall.
- Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope: Launched in June 2008, costs for NASA's $774.5 million telescope to analyze gamma rays from a low Earth orbit has risen $51.2 million, or Virginia's portion of the latest round of stimulus funds to improve its public housing.
- Orbiting Carbon Observatory: In February, NASA's $278 million satellite to measure atmospheric carbon dioxide crashed into the Indian Ocean after failing to reach orbit. Cost overruns for the project had reached $37.9 million, or the amount of federal funding recently announced to make Delaware homes and businesses more energy efficient.
- Solar Dynamics Observatory: The $817 million satellite to study the sun has been delayed 17 months to January 2010 as costs have risen some $31.5 million since October 2006, or roughly the amount Iowa spent on its food-stamps program in February.
- Aquarius: The launch of NASA's $253 million satellite that will analyze Earth's water cycle has been delayed to May 2010, and costs have increased some $11.7 million, roughly equal to the amount of federal stimulus funding recently awarded to the Veteran Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System for emergency power distribution upgrades and a new plumbing system.
- Dawn: Launched in September 2007, this $465 million asteroid probe is expected to visit asteroids Vesta and Ceres during its 3-billion mile trip to better understand the formation of the solar system. Costs have increased $4.6 million since October 2006, roughly equal to the deficit facing the city of Bloomington, Ind.
Historically, the space program has been a matter of national pride. Fueled by a passion for exploration and curiosity about the universe, billions of dollars have been spent to be the first on the moon and other shuttle missions. Since the 1950's, when Russia launched the Sputnik, there has been a competitiveness with other countries to explore space.
While occasionally I hear how the space program is assisting all of us with 'scientific discoveries,' I really don't know what benefit NASA has for most Americans. We have been so busy driving around on the moon, we haven't questioned why we needed to do so in the first place. Is there a long term goal or outcome we are looking for with all this money?
Barbara Bartlein is the People Pro. For her FREE e-mail newsletter, please visit: The People Pro.