Auto dealers carve out exemption in consumer-protection legislation
Consumer advocates had hoped that auto dealers would be included in pending legislation to create a new consumer watchdog agency. But a grassroots effort pushed by dealers and their leading trading group, the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), resulted in members of the House Financial Services Committee on Thursday voting 47 to 21 in favor of an amendment to exclude auto dealers.
The successful effort was led Rep. John Campbell (R-Calif.), who argued that auto dealers aren't financial organizations and shouldn't be regulated by a bill that would create a "financial" protection agency for consumers. But the group of some three dozen consumer and civil rights organizations doesn't see it that way, arguing that arranging on-site financing for vehicle purchases are a big source of profits for car dealers.
Further, the group argued that current auto dealer practices are rife with abuse and lead the list of complaints filed with local and state consumer agencies by disgruntled customers. Among the shady practices the group highlighted are those such as bait-and-switch financing, falsification of credit applications, "loan packing" -- deceptive sales of overpriced add-on items, which may include features as frivolous as paint stripes -- and charging excessive interest rates or dealer markup.
Many of the scams closely parallel the abuses and predatory practices that led to the mortgage meltdown, the group said.
Though the auto-dealer exemption was approved and the larger bill was voted out of House committee, the NADA is continuing lobbying efforts to ensure that dealers remain exempt, saying the "bill still has a number of hurdles to overcome before reaching the White House for final approval."
The Obama administration, which is pushing the consumer-protection legislation, opposed the auto dealer exemption, which also extends to retailers and title-insurance providers. Companies that actually provide the auto loans themselves would not be left out of the pending legislation, which passed on a largely party line vote in committee, 39 to 29.
Among other changes to the legislation was one to allow 98 percent of the banking industry, comprised of some 8,000 community banks and credit unions, to keep their current regulators when enforcing new consumer rules.
Still, President Obama said the House bill, which would create a regulator to oversee mortgages and credit cards, was a step forward.
"This bill has now passed a major hurdle and this step sends an important signal to the American people that we will not stand by and allow big financial firms and their lobbyists to mobilize against change," the president said in a statement.
Democrats vowed to fight for reinstatement of some of the excised provisions when the legislation hits the House floor. Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), speaking at a press conference Thursday, said he and other Democrats would fight to reinstate provisions to regulate the financing products of auto dealers as part of the House bill.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-24-2009 @ 11:39AM
Jim said...
I still remember helping a handicapped friend purchase a new car for cash, something we didn't tell the salesman until after we agreed on a price. This seemed to cause him some anguish, and we were soon lured into the office of the dealership's "finance expert." Knowing what was about to come, I told the man I was my friend's accountant (a lie) and made airy references to as many real and fictitious
financial principles I could think of. The poor man got so confused that he finally gave up, and we got the car on our terms. The only bad part was the impact on my friend's health. She nearly chocked to death from supressed laughter.
I hope the government dosen't take away these and the other little pleasures of consumer finance that seem to crop up every so often.
Reply
10-25-2009 @ 4:17PM
gene said...
REP. JOHN CAMPBELL SHOULD BE THROWN OUT OF OFFICE, WHO IS MORE CORRUPT THAN AUTO DEALERSHIPS AND HE IS TRYING TO EXEMPT THEM FROM A BILL THAT PUTS A LITTLE OVERSITE ON THEM, THIS IS THE PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WHY JOHN Q HATES POLITICIANS
Reply