First-time homebuyers tax credit: Should Congress end it or extend it?
Filed under: Economy
While headlines in newspapers across the country today focus on the possibility that hundreds of millions of dollars in fraudulent claims may have been paid out under the first-time homebuyers tax credit, there's an even more a pressing matter regarding the credit that must be dealt with soon: Should the tax credit be extended past Nov. 30? If so, how large should the tax credit be, and for how long should it be available?Despite the possibly significant number of the frauds, which were revealed Thursday by the Treasury Department and the IRS in testimony before the House Ways and Means Oversight subcommittee, there's bipartisan support for extending the first-time homebuyers tax credit, with over two dozen bills seeking to keep it going in some form. Clearly, based on existing homes sales figures, the credit is working.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) wants to extend the current $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers for another four months, and then lower the amount by $2,000 every three months to gradually phase out the benefit.
Even more enthusiastic about the credit are Sens. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) and Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), who want to extend the tax credit to all homebuyers until June 30, and raise the income limits to $150,000 for a single person and $300,000 for a couple. Currently, the income limits are $75,000 for a single person and $150,000 for a couple. Some lawmakers are balking at this option because it would cost about $16.7 billion in lost tax revenues.
Mark Zandi, the chief economist of Moody's Economy.com supports extension of the tax credit. He writes, "Based on simulations of the Moody's Economy.com macro model, the expanded tax credit, if extended through the end of 2010, would increase 2010 sales by almost 600,000. This in turn would generate $33 billion in additional real GDP, lifting growth in 2010 by about 25 basis points." In addition, he adds, "Benefits would flow to a range of hard-pressed industries, including mortgage lenders, real estate firms, insurance companies, property maintenance and repair businesses, and building supply retailers."
The White House right now is not excited about extending the tax credit, and has sent out its deputies to try to quash efforts to do so. In testimony before the Senate on Tuesday, Shaun Donovan, secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said there is evidence the tax credit benefited the housing market, but questioned whether the cost was worth it, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal. Donovan told the Senate he does not expect to see a "catastrophic decline" in home sales if the tax credit expires on Nov. 30, but does think an expiration could have some "negative implications" for the market.
But the bigger attempt to try to kill the tax credit is being led by the IRS and its testimony about fraudulent claims. The IRS testified before the House Ways and Means Committee that:- 19,300 people claimed the credit on their 2008 tax returns before they had purchased a home, for a total of $139 million;
- 74,000 buyers, including some IRS employees, claimed $500 million even though they had owned a home before; and
- 580 taxpayers under age 18, including some as young as 4 years old, claimed the credit, resulting in another $4 million in fraudulent claims. The IRS suspects some parents used their children to dodge income limitations.
In total, the IRS has identified 160 potential schemes relating to the first-time homebuyers tax credit that could result in criminal investigations, and has targeted 107,000 claims for reexamination, some of which have been frozen. The problems occurred because the tax credit program began before fraud monitors were put in place. Now that the IRS has identified potential fraud schemes and knows what changes might be needed in the law, it says it can prevent a recurrence of these problems. The fraud-detection software is already in place to catch most of the known frauds. Also, lawmakers already plan to add a provision requiring taxpayers be at least 18 years old to claim the tax credit.
Anything that improves the situation in the housing market will help everyone. House prices will continue to fall until the backlog of foreclosures and other homes on the market has been cleared. Zandi writes, "Since the peak in housing wealth, homeowners have lost more than $5 trillion in home equity, and close to 15 million homeowners -- more than a fourth of all those with first mortgages -- are estimated to be under water; their homes are worth less than they owe. With nest eggs so cracked, households are in no mood to spend more."
Consumers' moods must be improved before the economy can hope to rebound. Improving home values will certainly go a long way to making that happen.
Lita Epstein has written more than 25 books, including The 250 Questions You Should Ask About Buying Foreclosures.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 10)
10-23-2009 @ 1:40PM
IrishToch said...
Where's the tax credit for those who already have homes - paid their bills, their mortgages, and are threatened to lose their homes? It's okay to give out freebies to new owners, but NOTHING is being done about those that did everything right, then lost their jobs, their equity, etc. This is bull - handouts to new owners, but God forbid, should help be offered to those already suffering homeowners! Where the H*** is my tax credit?????????????????
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 1:49PM
sean said...
It's in Iraq and Afghanistan. And it's in the tax cuts to the wealthy. It's also in the un-funded medicare "D". It's also in the de-regulation bills and the unchecked corportate greed over the past admins failures.
This is what was needed to be done to get people to buy houses. To get those houses off the market, banks balance sheets and from devaluing the rest of the neighborhood.
Should you really own a home, you should be thankful that they are finding ways to get people back into the empty ones on your street.
If they stayed empty, kids, drug dealers, squatters would/could break in and set up shop.
Shut up a try and take a look at the big picture.
As far a fraud, if they know where the fraud is, then they'll get their money back, with interest and penalties, and the sleaze could go to jail.
10-23-2009 @ 2:03PM
bob c said...
You've been getting your tax break for years!!! I have never owned a home and have paid over $10k / year in taxes most of my life. You get to write off interest, real estate taxes and improvements - etc. Not to mention write off for rugrats. I'm ready to buy and I could use a break after all these years! BTW that's $10K / year in taxes and I only make about $50K / year.
10-23-2009 @ 2:14PM
Charles Schwarz said...
actually you are getting the benifit of the tax credit. The HBO economy has destroyed the housing market so anything that can get the housing market benifits you
HBO= Hoover, Bush and Obama
10-23-2009 @ 2:56PM
David said...
I agree 1000% with you comments. Home owners deserve tax relief also. I too have paid both Taxes and Mortgage on time. Re-elections are coming up, new blood and honest blood is needed.
10-23-2009 @ 4:17PM
Paul said...
Congress should not end the program, but stop people who already have homes and I buying homes for rentals, this is good old American Greed, people should not be losing their homes to these greedy people, but you have to consider that there is a lot of people losing their jobs and can not make the payments, that is not their fault, they probably bought over valued property from the greedy realestate agents, anything to make a buck, that seems to be our mentality, class warfare..................................
10-23-2009 @ 4:36PM
robertsewa said...
But think - if there are a lot of homes on the market not selling - what do you think is happening to your home's value? Its being driven down. Like it or not, its one of the few good programs that works - and works for even those who are not able to take advantage of the credit. Your home will not go up in value - and may even decrease - if there are a glut of homes on the market. Its in everyone's best interest to get rid of this glut which will then brong everyone' home value up.
It should be reviewed every year though when the glut is brought down
10-23-2009 @ 8:30PM
Paul said...
Not intending to start a nuclear war here, but I recently recall reading that the next Obama assault on your assets after Obama Care, Cap & Trade & the Value Added Tax will be that homeowners will have to pay a form of "income tax" on Home ownership. That is, a homeowner will pay a "income tax" on the difference between your mortgage payment & the "Fair market" rental value of your home. The tax proceeds would be used to give free or subsidized rent to low income renters or otherwise qualified for other government entitlements. If you own your home outright (no mortgage) you will be taxed 100% on the fair market rental value of your home. Has anbody else read this as part of the BHO tax / level the playing field /everybody's going to have "skin" in the game tax plan? Just wondering if anyone else has caught wind of this.
10-23-2009 @ 10:34PM
Tim said...
Right On.. .. Well Done
10-24-2009 @ 1:51AM
BARBARA said...
THATS RIGHT..WHERE IS MY TAX CREDIT..MR PRESIDENT.
10-24-2009 @ 8:06AM
judy said...
I completely agree with you!!!
Where is my credit or break. My husband and I are trying to keep our home with no one to help us. It has been a struggle.
At one point we were told to foreclose. Sorry, nothing we can do!!!
I was laid off in Oct. 2008,and my husband had emergency surgery the end of Oct and again in April 2009.
We have been a home owner for 12 years. Now, sorry there;'s nothing we can do!!
10-24-2009 @ 10:38AM
Greg said...
I say extend the credit for another 2 years. They're worrying about loosing a few billion dollars in tax revenue and they gave hundreds of billions of our tax money to banks, insurance companies, fannie may, freddie mac, etc. Why not help out the tax payers with they're own money. When someone buys a house, they also buy furniture, appliances, etc. which they pay taxes on and also helps the manufacturers put workers back to work. Call your congressmen and tell them to extend the credit.
10-24-2009 @ 12:13PM
Steve said...
I agree with you. However when the banks were bailed out they were susposed to loosen lending criteria. This never happened, instead they raised ALL their fees sticking it to the people who flit the bill due to their gross mismanagement. The President came up with the loan modification program to help those of us in trouble that pay their bills but,according to Wells Fargo If you have a Freddie Mac or Fanny Mae loan you are NOT eligible for the government program. Didn't WE bail them out also??? Wish I could get a bailout. Lost 35% of my income over the last 2 years. Wonder where I can apply for a my reinbursement of the $35,000 I've lost over the last 2 years????
10-24-2009 @ 9:40PM
eric said...
This country wasn't founded on handouts. You are not entitled to a government handout because you can't pay your bills. If that was the case everybody would buy a house and wait for the government to pay for it. The 8k tax credit should go away. People should work out deals with the banks they borrowed the money from, not wait for government handouts.
10-24-2009 @ 10:04PM
pegger said...
I agree makes me mad I keep making payments on a house I cant sell because I let some "good people" rent it for a few months and they did over 5k worth of damage before they moved out when the rent check bounced. Wheres my help? Ins co laughed at me said I was stupid for doing it and should learn alesson. Do I get a tax credit? ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm noooooooooooooooooo.
10-26-2009 @ 7:52PM
Kurt said...
This is for Bob who says he makes $50K a year and pays $10K in taxes. Bob you must be the most ignorant person I have seen with post. My daughter makes $48K and she not only does not pay any taxes but also gets an extra $3000 from the tax credits that are available to her. She does not own a home and does not itemize. There is no way someone that makes that small an income can pay that much in Federal taxes. You must not have any health, vision or dental insurance that would reduce your taxable income; also you must not put anything into a 401K losing a double whammy of reducing your taxable income and getting a $200 to $400 tax credit for having a 401K or similiar type plan. You also must be single with no dependents. But even with all these don't haves there is no way in the graduate federal income rates that with the standard deduction and self only dependent deduction would you have a $10,000 tax liability. If you filled out your return correctly and had no tax advantages your worst case tax liability would have been $6,900. Whom ever is doing you tax return must be pocketing the difference and the odds are you it is for a lot more than $3100. Based on IRS statistics most people that have a gross income of $50,000 after taking into consideration any tax breaks would either have a limited liability or even getting a refund greater than what was withheld. For example, my daughter has a child, has day care expenses, has health insurance and contributes to an IRS. After all that she gets back more than she has withheld during the years. GET EDUCATED OR TALK TO IRS AND THEY WILL HELP YOU DO YOU RETURN CORRECTLY.
10-25-2009 @ 1:04PM
Francene said...
Ain't that the truth! Where are the rewards for the people who made the RIGHT decisions, still have their job, and don't live beyond their means? I suppose you could say that virtue is it's own reward, but that's a pretty hollow complement when your tax dollars are supporting a program that replicates the conditions that caused so many foreclosures in the first place: underqualified people spending money they don't have and getting mortgages they can't afford. they are giving temporary loans against that tax credit so people can use it for down payments and closing costs. if you can't afford a down payment and closing costs, you can't afford a house, and you shouldn't rely on other taxpayers to be your co-signer.
10-25-2009 @ 7:26PM
almagayle50 said...
You are exactly right. It took me 8 months to get Countrywide to modify my loan. My congressman had to get involved. Then they added thousands on to the balance. I guess they didn't get enough in bailout money to pass along the savings. Now they're setting deadlines for property taxes to be paid prior to when they're due and again threatening to take my home. I have a severely handicapped child here. There was medicaid fraud in his case with billing but no care for him so I lost my business. I'm employed but everything is going up, especially the cost to maintain him. My bank pulls one stunt after another to assess additional fees. Enough. Where is Nancy Pelosi? Where are the attorneys general who filed suits against the mortgage companies? And why aren't moratoriums being implemented on foreclosures, bank fees, and tax limits set. Enough is enough.
10-23-2009 @ 1:46PM
doc said...
i can answer your question irish, the reason is that since most of the people your are talking about are white the current anti-white administration will do nothing.
as for whether or not the new homeowner tax credit will be extended has to do with the current racist administration determining if it benefits white people, if so, then of course it will be terminated
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 2:01PM
sean said...
How cute, Glen Beck has graced us with his presence. What a joy to have a complete moron join in.