U.S. Treasury and the Fed unveil pay plans for bailed-out firms
Filed under: Company News, Economy, Investing
The U.S. Treasury Department on Thursday ordered seven companies that received billions of dollars in government bailouts to halve total compensation for their top executives. But the big reductions will not apply to pay earned before November. Kenneth Feinberg, the Treasury official leading the pay review, told reporters that average salaries for the top 25 executives are being cut 90 percent starting next month.Also on Thursday, the Federal Reserve unveiled a proposal Thursday that would police banks' pay policies to ensure they don't encourage employees to take reckless gambles like those that contributed to the financial crisis.
Unlike the Treasury plan, the Fed proposal would cover thousands of banks, including many that never received a bailout. But the central bank would not actually set compensation. Instead, the Fed would review - and could veto - pay policies that could cause too much risk-taking by executives, traders or loan officers.
Treasury's action will apply to the top executives at Bank of America Corp., American International Group Inc., Citigroup Inc., General Motors, GMAC, Chrysler and Chrysler Financial.
The government did not want to make executives return compensation already received this year, but the reduced pay levels will be the base for making decisions on salary in 2010, Feinberg said. The executives will still be subject to compensation limits as long as their companies are receiving support from the government's $700 billion bailout fund. Their total compensation was being cut in half, on average.
Cash salaries will be limited to $500,000 for more than 90 percent of affected employees. Personal expenses for such perks as company autos and corporate jets will be capped at $25,000 without approval from Feinberg's office for higher payments.
Feinberg got the job as pay czar earlier this year when Congress, responding to outrage about huge bonuses being paid to AIG , amended the bailout law to require that executive compensation at companies getting exceptional assistance be curbed. He has been reviewing compensation packages since August and called many of the negotiations "intense."
Speaking earlier at the White House, President Barack Obama welcomed Treasury's decision and said Americans' values are offended by excessive paychecks for executives whose companies were bailed out by taxpayers. He urged Congress to pass legislation to give shareholders a voice in executive pay packages.
"It does offend our values when executives of big financial firms that are struggling pay themselves huge bonuses even as they rely on extraordinary assistance to stay afloat," Obama said.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner also praised the outcome of Feinberg's deliberations. "We gave him the difficult task of cutting excessive pay, striking a balance between compensation and risk taking and keeping strong management teams in place to help the economies recover - all in the public interest," Geithner said in a statement.
Smaller companies and those that have repaid the bailout money, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., are not affected by the plan.
Feinberg restructured the pay packages for top executives to provide a base salary and a portion described as "stock salary." The employees will be required to hold the stock for two years and then can only sell one-third of the stock payment each year for three years.
A third category, called "long-term restricted stock," is not guaranteed. This category can only be paid to an employee once a company has repaid its bailout money. Feinberg said his goal was to tie compensation more closely to the long-term performance of the company.
In one pay plan approved by Feinberg, the three highest earners at Citigroup will receive a base salary of $475,000. Each executive also will be paid between $5.6 million and $5.8 million in company stock to be redeemed beginning in 2011. The third category of long-term restricted stock will equal $3 million for each executive.
GM said in a statement that it will adopt the compensation changes outlined by Feinberg by shifting its pay packages toward non-cash compensation that is tied to company performance. "Along with restoring GM to profitability, a key priority is responsible stewardship of the public investment in our company and rapid repayment of that investment," the automaker said.
Bank of America declined to comment on Feinberg's plans, but a spokesman said the company was not worried about top executives leaving. "We're a strong company with a highly competitive platform and we believe people want to work here," said Scott Silvestri.
Chrysler Group LLC CEO Sergio Marchionne and other Fiat executives who work for both Chrysler and Fiat were exempted from the pay cuts as part of the agreement with the U.S. government for Fiat to take over management control of Chrysler and get a 20 percent stake in the company.
Executives who work solely for Chrysler could be affected, but many of the top earners under Chrysler's former owner have left the company including former CEO Robert Nardelli and former Vice Chairman Tom LaSorda. Deputy CEO Jim Press also is about to leave the company.
Under the Fed proposal, the 28 biggest banks would develop their own plans to make sure compensation doesn't spur undue risk taking. If the Fed approves, the plan would be adopted and bank supervisors would monitor compliance.
At smaller banks - where compensation is typically less - Fed supervisors will conduct reviews. Those banks don't have to submit plans. The Fed refused to identify the 28 banks that will have to submit plans. But Citigroup, Bank of America and Wells Fargo & Co. are usually included on such lists. Nearly 6,000 banks regulated by the Fed would be covered.
"The Federal Reserve is working to ensure that compensation packages appropriately tie rewards to longer-term performance and do not create undue risk for the firm or the financial system," said Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke .
In the AIG trading division, the arm of the company whose risky trades caused its downfall, no top executive will receive more than $200,000 in total compensation for 2009. However, the issue of $198 million in bonuses that are to be paid to employees of the trading unit in 2010 still must be determined. The government has said it will push to see those bonuses reduced.
The giant insurance company has received taxpayer assistance valued at more than $180 billion. AIG representatives declined to comment Thursday.
The pay restrictions for all seven companies will require any executive seeking more than $25,000 in special benefits - things such as country club memberships, private planes and company cars - to get permission for those perks from the government.
Feinberg's decisions come days after administration officials voiced sharp criticism of plans by some firms, particularly those on Wall Street, to pay huge bonuses even as the country continues to struggle with rising unemployment and the effects of the recession.
Goldman Sachs, which has paid back its bailout money, has said it earmarked $16.7 billion for compensation so far this year, more than $500,000 per employee. Citigroup is paying $5.3 billion in bonuses to its employees and Bank of America $3.3 billion.
Elsewhere, Freddie Mac is giving its chief financial officer compensation worth as much as $5.5 million, including a $2 million signing bonus. The government-controlled mortgage finance company doesn't have to follow the executive compensation rules because it is being paid outside the TARP.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
10-22-2009 @ 5:46PM
Charles Williams said...
Wouldn't it be great if the federal government started putting spending restrictions on citizens who receive any sort of government assistance. Federal stafford loan receiving students would have to get classes approved by the Class Czar or maybe welfare recipients would have to get permission from the Welfare Czar to go out to dinner. What a great socialistic idea. I think they had that in the USSR about 20 years ago. Now the Fed (a non-government entity) wants to jump on this grand idea. Just keeps getting better and better.
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 10:45PM
B. Rosner said...
Well Charlie- if you can't tell the difference between these obscene amounts of salary and bonus money and what welfare and student loan recipients get you are an example of the problem.
10-22-2009 @ 5:33PM
NICK said...
Look what George Bush started and this ass hole Obama made worse, should have let these outfits go under. Obama has the USA on the fast track with his pimps in the Congress and his pimps in the WHITEHOUSE, dead fish Rahm, and grease monkey Axexrod. They have been reading CHAVEZ 101 at warp speed and trying to destory anyone that doesn't believe in their stupid ass ideas.
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 5:45PM
A. Mancin said...
all we can hope is that some of these companies will sue these bastards - this is illegal and unconstitutional. It is a grab for more and more power. And to the people who scream that these people are too much anyhow, do you think making $15,000,000 for a move is also too much or is Hollywood exempt. What about ball players who make $10,000,000 a year...exempt from Obama scrutiny?? I know, I know, they did get to bail out, but where does this government "control" stop???
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 6:27PM
ij70 said...
The companies can do a very simple thing. They can pay off the money that government gave them, the TARP. :-)
Then the question is: Can they pay off the TARP? The answer is maybe some can, but the "big boys" can not. Bank of America can not, GM can not and some others can not pay it back.
So. They either shut up and "soldier", quite their job or close down the whole company. Those are their choices.
10-22-2009 @ 5:51PM
sgentilejr said...
How about a new pay plan for Congress? Just think of how much we could save if we paid members of Congress for "Performance".
Chances are that they would owe us money every year and never draw one cent of salary.
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 7:49PM
ar1927 said...
Thats what I was going to suggest except I would add Obams and his 40 thieves to the list.
10-22-2009 @ 6:13PM
Wanda said...
This all sounds good what they are trying to do but in the end these companies will have loopholes out the nose to get their greedy paws on the money. This is just another ploy to make us mainstreet folks believe they are doing something good for us.........What good they could do for us is help the UNEMPLOYED people keep their houses from foreclosure and create jobs!!!! Once they do something like that it would show they actually care about us!
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 6:19PM
george said...
This is stricktly cosmetical! Goldman & Sach got 12.8 billion of the taxpayers money (via AIG) that they are now merrily giving out in bonuses!
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 6:32PM
ij70 said...
GS paid off their loan from the government. Did they get more money via AIG, sure, but it was not TARP money. So now AIG is under, but GS is not. GS paid their TARP. AIG has not paid off their TARP. All is fair as far as I can see it. AIG is welcome to pay off their TARP money and then they can set whatever bonuses they like, just like GS. The trouble is, AIG peeps are not as smart as GS peeps, therefore AIG is still under government control.
10-22-2009 @ 6:26PM
forrestfreedman said...
Hey, just another example of Obama being asleeep at the wheeel and driving this nation into ruin. Obama's been President since January 20, 2009 (9 months)....but since he just went to New York to raise 3 million for democratic congressional candidates from the CEOs from Bank of America, AIG and other rip off bailed out corporations, he chose to only make the pay cut effective in November.
That's like letting 90% of the water out of a swimming pool, and telling the USD Tax Payer that the pool is safe and "to just dive in" cause the Government's watching out for your best interest.
I bet if the President didn't raise the three million in campaign contributions, he wouldn't have been as generous with our tax money given his slipping approval rating. How stupid does Obama think the American public really is.
Hey Bill Mahr, try to put a politically correct spin on this transparent fraud ...if you cam!!
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 7:22PM
Joey said...
The only solution to our problem with wreckless behavior by the fanancial institutions is to bring back the Galss-Seagall Act. "If you are looking for a major cause of the current banking meltdown, you need seek no further than the 1999 repeal of the Glass-Seagall Act [signed by Bill Clinton]." William Kaufman
Reply
10-25-2009 @ 6:15PM
jo jo said...
Obama knows how stupid the public is, they voted for him.
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 8:48PM
Chris said...
I am 58 yrs. old, I fought for my country because I loved it, trying to get ahead, believing in a free market, believing if you work hard you'll get ahead. It is gone, my trust in goverment. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to see 99.9% are crooks (white collar), looking out for #1 and not the people that elected them. I know it is worse in other countries, but I am not proud to be an american as I once was. The goverment, the media, can go south before I'd fight again.
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 8:52PM
PHIL said...
I DID APPLY FOR A LOAN MODIFICATION 7 MONTHS AGO , I AM WAITING WAITING ,WAITING .
I AM THINKING THAT WE ARE THE PUPETTE ,AND THEY WANT OUR END ,FOR THEM TO KEEP EVERYTHING .
RICHE WILL BE RICHER
POOR WILL BE ..................
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 9:46PM
Tech said...
These smart boy Harvard types should be hauled out and shot. Driving their compnaies into bankruptcy then forcing us to bail them all out while taking that money and passing billions in bonuses???? Where's the cops? Call the FBI! We want the money back a moron could have run these companies like GM better! The executives purposely outsourced them and looted them and took off with golden parachutes worth tens of millions? Criminals.
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 10:32PM
wadet said...
All I have heard is the justification of paying these compensations packages is to keep the top talent! If they were or are that talented how did their company get in such dismal shape? Pay compensations on performance enhanced packing only! If you don't perform to expectations then you don't get compensated!What is so damn hard to understand?! That is how the little minions in the company get paid.....The sports francises should have those clauses also....To many getting rewarded for doing absolutly nothing!Take away the silver spoon and roll up your sleeves!
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 1:19AM
Mitch said...
How can a company be obligated to pay bonuses to managers who caused catratrophic failures in the past???? I guarantee that if my retirement fund management company hires or has hired any of the losers that worked for companies that invested in toxic assets, they will be sued for billions in a class action lawsuit for malfeasance. We must demand better performace from the "experts" that we entrust with our futures!
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 2:23AM
John said...
Remember Nixon tried this: He put a tax on T-Bone steaks and to get around it the butcher just cut the beef differant.Obama hes such a jack-ass.
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 5:17AM
KENNETH J DUKOFF said...
NICOLE RICHIE
EVERYONE GOES TO JAIL.
QUOTE.
Reply