Skip to Content

AT&T: Good for investors, not so good for customers

Text SizeAAA

Filed under: Company News, Technology, Earnings, Apple, AT&T, Verizon

More

AT&T (T) customers complain about dropped calls, glacial web-surfing speeds and shoddy coverage. Wall Street, on the other hand, loves the way the phone giant runs its network.

For an explanation of that disconnect, let's take a look at AT&T's third-quarter earnings, announced earlier today. The telecom's results topped Wall Street profit forecasts and delivered revenues in line with estimates. Shares gained about 2% in midday trading to around $26.40.

Here's where the numbers start to tell the story: AT&T activated a record 3.2 million iPhone customers over the quarter. But despite the huge ramp-up in these famously data-hungry devices, AT&T's capital spending actually dropped 24 percent to $4 billion from the same period a year ago. Partially as a result, free cash flow surged to $13.9 billion for the first three quarters of the year from $7.9 billion during the same period a year ago.

"If there was a surprise in the quarter, then, it was that the tsunami of capital spending to support all that data usage never came," Craig Moffett, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein wrote in a research report following the results.

In other words, the same tightfisted ways that drive some customers nuts have made AT&T a hit with investors. Shares of AT&T have outpaced rival Verizon Communications (VZ) by about a staggering 25% over the last five years. And Verizon is widely credited for having a more broadly available and more robust network, to most customers' delight.

It seems that AT&T's iPhone approach is shrewd when it comes to the bottom line. Sure, the company pays heavy subsidies to Apple (AAPL) for the devices. But AT&T gets to piggyback off the popularity of the iPhone while skimping on some of the massive costs that would come with putting up additional radio towers and building out a bigger network.

Nor is AT&T's thrift limited to wireless services. Reeling from landline losses, both Verizon and AT&T have responded by rolling out pay-TV services in addition to phone and broadband connections. Verizon will spend a total of $23 billion dollars on its FiOS service, which strings fiber optics to a customer's home.

But AT&T is spending only $7 billion on its U-verse service, which takes fiber to the neighborhood level but then pushes the massive amounts of data over the company's traditional copper lines. The service has been slammed for glitches by customers, but investors are so far cheering AT&T's much more limited approach.

When it comes to AT&T, investors may be better off buying the company's stock than its services.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Interest Rates

5/1 ARM+4.06%APR: +3.75%
30 Yr.
Fixed Mort.
+5.03%APR: +5.16%
$30K
HELOC
+8.00%APR: 0.00%
30 Mo
New Car Loan
+6.77%APR: 0.00%
1 Yr. CD+1.57%APR: +1.58%
DailyFinance Writers
Melly Alazraki Melly Alazraki Financial writer and analyst
James Altucher James Altucher Financial columnist
Jeff Bercovici Jeff Bercovici Media columnist
Jonathan Berr Jonathan Berr Financial writer and media columnist
Mercedes Cardona Mercedes Cardona Retail reporter
Tim Catts Tim Catts Financial writer
Peter Cohan Peter Cohan Author, venture capitalist and financial writer
Carrie Coolidge Carrie Coolidge Financial writer
Lita Epstein Lita Epstein Financial writer
Sam Gustin Sam Gustin Technology Writer
Nikhil Hutheesing Nikhil Hutheesing Tech and investing editor
Joseph Lazzaro Joseph Lazzaro Markets and economics writer
Latif Lewis Michelle Leder Financial Columnist
Latif Lewis Latif Lewis Business news editor and management columnist
Anthony Massucci Anthony Massucci Senior writer and tech columnist
Doug McIntyre Doug McIntyre Business and investing news writer and editor
Michael Mercurio Michael Mercurio Managing Editor
Todd Pruzan Todd Pruzan Features editor
Michael Rainey Michael Rainey Editor and economics writer
Alex Salkever Alex Salkever Senior technology writer
David Schepp David Schepp Business News reporter
Matthew Scott Matthew Scott Investing reporter and editor
Dan Solin Daniel R. Solin Author, investment advisor and retirement expert
Amey Stone Amey Stone Executive editor
Bruce Watson Mark Svenvold Columnist, renewable energy
Russel Turk, M.D. Russell Turk, M.D. Healthcare policy columnist
Bruce Watson Bruce Watson Features Writer
my portfolios

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance than anywhere else.

Create a New Portfolio My Portfolios

Daily Finance Partners

More from the Weblogs Network