New York Times will keep The Boston Globe
Filed under: Media, New York Times Co.
The New York Times Company (NYT), which had planned to sell The Boston Globe, now says it will keep it. The Times had taken bids for the paper, including one from Platinum Equity, a group led by a former Globe executive and a member of the Globe's founding family, which has recently bought other media properties.
The Times says that the reason for keeping the Globe is that significant cost cuts at the paper have made it more financially viable. The Times paid $1.1 billion for the Boston paper in 1993 and some industry experts put its current value at $20 million.
The profit margins in the industry may never be spectacular again, but the demise of many more large papers has become much less likely.
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-15-2009 @ 5:45AM
susan thomas said...
Dear Webmaster,
I am Susan Thomas. I am a webmaster of some financial websites and blogs (namely on debt, credit, mortgage, insurance, real estate, loan, bankruptcy, and so on). All of my sites and blogs are strictly dedicated to finance. They have a good web presence and traffic too.
I have visited your blog: http://www.dailyfinance.com today and, I must truly appreciate you for the rich content in your blog as well as for the nice look of it.
I am emailing you to ask whether you will be interested in exchanging links with my sites or blogs. I will also offer you the same quality and relevant content pages that receive maximum traffic. It will certainly help you enhance your site’s ranking too.
If this proposal is liked by you, and if you are interested in the link exchange, please contact me at susanthomas2006@gmail.com. I sincerely believe that you would give a serious thought to it.
Thank you very much in advance to take your time to read this mail.
Expecting to hear a positive reply from you,
Regards,
Susan
[If you are offended to receive this mail, I do apologize beforehand to annoy you. Inconvenience is cordially regretted.]
Reply