E-mail is dead? Don't take my anti-boor shield away!

Wall Street Journal writer Jessica E. Vascellaro recently wrote a provocative article arguing that e-mail is giving way to other, richer forms of communication: Facebook, Twitter, instant messaging, and (on an approach vector) Google Wave (GOOG).

Fifteen years ago, electronic mail was fresh and shiny, efficient and economical. Today, it's a stone ax next to communication methods that let us tag, filter, and engage in real-time exchanges, group conversations, and multimedia. In a society that increasingly depends on consensus for decision-making, these new tools play an important role in keeping the tribes intact.Yet e-mail will still have its place in this world for years to come.
Why? Because different relationships call for different means of communication.
  • Lovers, parents, and children want to connect as intimately and immediately as possible -- real-time, multisensual, and with perfect fidelity -- which is why the military sets up video calls for overseas troops.
  • Young people prowling for life partners want to maintain their networks via frequent (incessant?) touches with a large group. Users like this IM "sup?" a hundred times a day and Tweet every aggravation, no matter how petty.
  • Businesses want to coordinate their work yet control the flow of information. Their messages are more formal and hierarchical. When two executives don't rank equally, real-time conversations demanding input and decision-making aren't always desirable. If the guy in the mail room has the courage to send a suggestion to the CEO, he's not going to use IM. He's going to use e-mail.
  • And e-mail excels in its function as an anti-boor shield. Who wants more real-time conversations with self-indulgent time-wasters? Who wants bill collectors, direct marketers, or religious proselytizers setting up camp in their electronic living rooms? Hurray for auto-reply, filters, and the delete button.
E-mail is the misanthrope's best friend, the key passive-aggressive management tool. Anyone who's ended an affair by leaving a kiss-off on the answering machine of a soon-to-be-ex would rue the decline of e-mail. It's also perfect for those on different schedules, or in different time zones: the exchange may be protracted, but it's still convenient.

The next time you're trapped in an unending IM session, ask yourself whether e-mail might have worked better. Disengaging from e-mail means never having to end the conversation rudely. Just because we can have real-time conversations involving multiple users with video links and embedded video doesn't mean we'll always use every bell and whistle. When we only need to press a thumbtack into a wall, the heel of our shoes work better than a hammer.

I hope that we're evolving toward a world in which we have a perfect answer for each communication problem. And while I embrace our new technologies, I don't think that any method can ever be one-size-fits-all. E-mail, by some name, will still find a place in our future communications -- even if it's the same place where we put our postcards or our billets doux.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Advice for Recent College Grads

Prepare yourself for the "real world".

View Course »

Understanding Credit Scores

Credit scores matter -- learn how to improve your score.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum