The reward for working 35 years at a modestly paying job in the public sector has long been security and the promise of a pension that nearly equaled and occasionally exceeded what a worker was receiving when he accepted his gold watch. And in most cases, these pension promises were indexed for inflation so they'd grow as the worker aged.
These pension liabilities don't have to be accounted for like they are in the corporate world. No putting on the balance sheet what actuaries believe the municipalities, school boards, etc., will need to meet these pension obligations so that taxpayers can understand what they've committed to and workers can judge the odds that they'll get what they're owed.
No. It's all very loosey-goosey, even as more and more people live longer and longer and the pension obligations get bigger and bigger.
Then came last year's meltdown. With public pension funds in the toilet and tax revenues declining because of unemployment and falling real estate values, how long will it take to catch up if the economy recovers soon, asked the Washington Post. The answer from one teacher's pension official in Ohio, whose fund lost 31% of its value: "Infinity."
The typical public pension fund will have less than half the money it needs by 2025, predicts Kim Nicholl, the national director of PricewaterhouseCoopers' public-sector-,retirement practice.
"Time bombs" is what the billionaire investment genius Warren Buffett has called them.
The International Monetary Fund says the same problem exists in industrialized countries all over the world and advocates a combination of raising taxes and lowering the payout to remedy the issue.
I don't know what the answer is, but that I can tell you, raising property taxes here in my Detroit-area neighborhood in order to make sure that the mayor gets every penny of his pension is going to be a really tough sell.
Actually, I think the Montana Public Employees' Retirement Board has a heck of a solution and one that will probably be widely adopted. When their actuary told them that there wasn't going to be enough money to pay pensions, they advertised for a new actuary – one who wouldn't call for unpopular solutions.
Scott Miller, attorney for the Montana Public Employees Board, when questioned about this head-in-the-sand approach by the Wall Street Journal, said: "The point is we aren't interested in bringing in an actuary to pressure the board. ..."
Point taken. Fiscal responsibility is over rated. Why can't all us taxpayers and our public servants just be happy eating dog food together?
Intro to economics. But fun.View Course »