Skip to Content

Why Obama should drop his fight against Fox News

Text SizeAAA

Filed under: People, Media

More

A good rule for public feuds is always to be punching up. Getting in a pissing match with someone of lesser stature only elevates your opponent's stature and diminishes yours, no matter who wins on points. But where does that rule leave the President of the United States? The leader of the free world may find it hard to find a worthy sparring partner, but that doesn't mean he's not sorely tempted to take a swing.

Right now, that temptation is coming from the midtown Manhattan headquarters of Fox News, which has been needling Barack Obama in ways large and small since long before he moved into the Oval Office. Fox officials would say their network is merely filling the vacuum left by the sycophancy of all the other mainstream news operations, which are only too eager to polish Obama's bust. You can decide for yourself whether Fox's relentless focus on ACORN and that missing birth certificate constitute valid watchdogging or biased mudslinging. Either way, the question is, is it smart for the Obama Administration to hit back?

Hitting back it is, after months of trying to play (mostly) nice. The change in tactics, according to Time, comes at the urging of communications director Anita Dunn. Venting her frustration to Michael Scherer, Dunn doesn't mince words. "They are opinion journalism masquerading as news," she says. The White House took an even harder shot last week on its official blog, debunking a number of supposed "Fox lies" and accusing the network of showing "disregard for the truth" in a "partisan attack."

Do you think President Obama should get tougher with the media?



How to deal with Rupert Murdoch's cable channel has been a dilemma for Team Obama since the primaries, when the Illinois senator refused to participate in a debate hosted by Fox and turned down invitation after invitation to appear on Fox News Sunday and The O'Reilly Factor. The solution he eventually hit on was very cautious engagement: an interview with O'Reilly and Chris Wallace and a behind-the-scenes meeting with Murdoch and Fox chief Roger Ailes.

Clearly, Obama was expecting that these peace offerings would yield a softening in Fox's tone towards him. Yet ever since Obama's inauguration, the network has been more critical than ever towards him -- and its increase in stridency has been matched by growth in ratings. Last week, on the eve of its 13th anniversary, Fox News was the No. 3 channel in all of basic cable for the total day.

What this means is that Obama lacks leverage. He can make the rounds of all the Sunday shows while snubbing Wallace, as he recently did, but it doesn't matter. Ailes would much rather Fox be No. 1 in viewers and advertisers than No. 1 in access.

Obama can't win this one, but he can avoid spending his ammunition in a hopeless fight. He should take heed of what I advised John McCain over a year ago: that running against the press is a loser's strategy. It signals weakness. And all the more so for someone like Obama, whose greatest strength is his superhuman ability to keep his cool. Sending his advisors to meet quietly with Fox executives to plead their case, as he did two weeks ago, is a smart move. Trying to intimidate Fox with public barbs and snubs is not.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 17)

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Interest Rates

5/1 ARM4.06%APR: 3.75%
30 Yr.
Fixed Mort.
5.03%APR: 5.16%
$30K
HELOC
8.00%APR: 0.00%
30 Mo
New Car Loan
6.77%APR: 0.00%
1 Yr. CD1.57%APR: 1.58%
DailyFinance Writers
Melly Alazraki Melly Alazraki Financial writer and analyst
James Altucher James Altucher Financial columnist
Jeff Bercovici Jeff Bercovici Media columnist
Jonathan Berr Jonathan Berr Financial writer and media columnist
Mercedes Cardona Mercedes Cardona Retail reporter
Tim Catts Tim Catts Financial writer
Peter Cohan Peter Cohan Author, venture capitalist and financial writer
Carrie Coolidge Carrie Coolidge Financial writer
Lita Epstein Lita Epstein Financial writer
Sam Gustin Sam Gustin Technology Writer
Nikhil Hutheesing Nikhil Hutheesing Tech and investing editor
Joseph Lazzaro Joseph Lazzaro Markets and economics writer
Latif Lewis Michelle Leder Financial Columnist
Latif Lewis Latif Lewis Business news editor and management columnist
Anthony Massucci Anthony Massucci Senior writer and tech columnist
Doug McIntyre Doug McIntyre Business and investing news writer and editor
Michael Mercurio Michael Mercurio Managing Editor
Todd Pruzan Todd Pruzan Features editor
Michael Rainey Michael Rainey Editor and economics writer
Alex Salkever Alex Salkever Senior technology writer
David Schepp David Schepp Business News reporter
Matthew Scott Matthew Scott Investing reporter and editor
Dan Solin Daniel R. Solin Author, investment advisor and retirement expert
Amey Stone Amey Stone Executive editor
Bruce Watson Mark Svenvold Columnist, renewable energy
Russel Turk, M.D. Russell Turk, M.D. Healthcare policy columnist
Bruce Watson Bruce Watson Features Writer
my portfolios

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance than anywhere else.

Create a New Portfolio My Portfolios

Daily Finance Partners

More from the Weblogs Network