Activists behind NY Post parody detained by police
Filed under: Media
The New York Post does not have a sense of humor about itself, it would seem. Early this morning, some 2,000 activists affiliated with a group called The Yes Men handed out copies of a 32-page parody issue calling attention to climate change. But when volunteers tried to distribute copies outside the Post's offices, they were detained by police and their papers were confiscated, says an eyewitness.
Photographer Jason Nicholas was taking pictures of Yes Men volunteers outside Grand Central Terminal when he got a text message letting him know there was an incident in progress at the News Corp. headquarters building on Avenue of the Americas about 10 blocks away. Nicholas raced to the scene in time to see police officers detaining three volunteers who had been handing out copies.
"They seized the papers that those guys were distributing" and took them inside the building, says Nicholas, who has photos of the confrontation. "It seemed they were acting in concert with building security because I noticed them talking before and after." Nicholas estimates the volunteers were held for 15 to 20 minutes. He could not say whether they were handing out papers on the sidewalk or on the concrete apron that fronts the News Corp. building.
A New York Post spokesman wasn't immediately available for comment.
The parody issue was distributed today to raise awareness in advance of tomorrow's United Nations talks on climate change. Yes Men co-founder Andy Bichlbaum says the group printed about 1 million copies at a cost of $50,000; the expense was underwritten by a private donor who prefers to remain anonymous.
Last fall, The Yes Men produced a fake New York Times edition about the Iraq War. Bichlbaum says the group chose the Post for its global warming stunt in part because of the paper's denialist stance on the issue. "Unfortunately, they never do real reporting on climate change," he says. "We're hoping this gives them the little kick in the ass that they need."
Update: I've contacted the NYPD press office to ask why the volunteers were detained, on what grounds their papers were confiscated and whether they'll be returned. I haven't heard back yet.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
9-21-2009 @ 2:49PM
Kimo Al Quds said...
Prove that your so called whinning about Climate change isn't part of the normal geological evolution this planet goes through. You climate folks are a lot like the anti evolution folks at the time of the scopes monley trial. You ignore science for your own drug addled beliefs. The planet has has voluminous jungles and vegitation before why are dianosaurs discovered in Montana which is now barren and cold or in Utah where the climate is much drier. Did human usage dry that up also? We have also had tremendous times when the planet was covered in Ice. How do you explain the changing climates back then? early .
industrial revolution pollution due to fires caused by lightning? Are the poles melting yes HAve they done that before????? YES! Y'all need real science to substantiate your arguments and you have none. it has happened in the past and will happen again you and your pseudo science are missing it as well as the cause. Note the shift of the magnetic poles and relate the poles position to what occurs with the climate over tha last several million years. Create real science around it instead of slogans and BS. We getr enough BS fron Gore with his inconvenient Lies movie
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 3:20PM
Andrew said...
I'm sorry Kimo, are you actually trying to claim that human caused global warming is contrary to science? And then comparing this view to creationists? I was under the impression that creationism and global warming denial both arose from cultural conservatives...
Is global warming real? yes. Is it a problem? yes. Did we cause it? I for one can't really make a judgment on this. It is currently in debate by the scientific community, and I am not nearly as qualified as those people. And I'll hazard a guess that you're not qualified either. So maybe you should avoid calling other's viewpoints "drug addled", after all, after all ad hominum arguments by definition are of zero consequence.
It's a pretty sad state of affairs when scientific discourse is hijacked by ideological demagogues.
p.s. have you even SEEN An Inconvenient Truth?
9-22-2009 @ 6:47AM
Joe said...
Right on buddy!!!
9-21-2009 @ 5:26PM
Jack said...
What does the issue of global warming have to do with the cops arresting them? Parody and fair use are an accepted part of law- they committed no crime.
9-21-2009 @ 5:28PM
Marc said...
Actually, in this case, those say there is climate change caused by humans should be compared to those who supported evolution so long ago. It is science, the grand majority if scientists, and all evidence which suggests climate change on a catastrophic scale, and that the primary cause is human activity. We have the reports. We have years of data supporting this. We have current examples of the change and how very much different and catastrophically fast it is occurring.
We also have data which shows that earth should be on a cooling trend due to solar activity. We should be getting cooler, not warmer.
The data is on our side. What have you got?
9-21-2009 @ 9:00PM
Jeff said...
I'm with Kimo. The earth is warming, then the deep freeze will come. It's happened countless times before. It's happening now. It's actually fairly miraculous that we've had this extended period of relatively mild weather given how chaotic the weather has been nistorically, as shown by the geological record. Andrew, have you seen the size of Gore's enormous, energy-guzzling mansion? You do realize he flies in a G5 to all his environment summits, leaving a mighty big set of carbon footprints as he goes, right? Can you not see he is just trying to stay relevant? Why listen to that guy? He's a bigger offender than any of us could ever dream of being. Stop thinking you're an expert in something just because you've watched Discovery channel everyday and seen some god-awful movie. Carbon footprints and carbon credits? What a joke. Don't you realize the people you are listening to are turning a hefty profit off the gullibilty of you people. Please, let's start a dialouge about how we will adapt as the NATURALLY occurring cycle of so-called climate change wreaks havoc on our current way of life. All people like Kimo and I are asking is that you minions in the Gore army stop running around screaming the sky is falling and it's all our fault. Trust me, Kimo and I are very aware the weather is turning on us, I'd rather talk about how to deal with it, not assign blame. And to Marc, go to school and take some classes on the climate and you'll learn that EVERYTIME the earth has frozen over, it was preceded by a massive warming period. The poles melt as the earth warms, releasing all that fresh water in the poles into the oceans. Fresh water does not sink to the bottom when it cools, effectively stopping the Atlantic Current, which is what keeps Europe mild while Canada is a frozen tundra. That is what is happening now.
9-21-2009 @ 11:12PM
Mike Fussell said...
WELL SAID!!! WELL SPOKEN!!! Good job Kimo!!!
9-22-2009 @ 4:56AM
brucemnsn said...
Kimo,
You left out the biggest air polluters there are and increasing in numbers VOLCANOS, THEY NOT ONLY CREATE AIR POLLUTION BUT INCREASE WATER TEMPURATURE IN THE OCEANS!
9-21-2009 @ 3:22PM
Gern Blanston said...
Kimo,
Thanks for posting your rebuttal. It's the clearest, most scientifically rigorous refutation of "global warming" I have ever seen. Certainly the mounds of data that prove global warming is already happening can't measure up to to your well-reasoned research.
I have read your treatise "industrial revolution pollution due to fires caused by lightning?" in the peer-reviewed Journal of Geophysical Research and found it to be without equal. Further, your symposium "Y'all need real science," delivered at the Proceedings of the Royal Society and reprinted in the Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry served as a wakeup call to all the so-called "scientists" who have dedicated their lives to determining the "truth" no matter how politically incorrect it may be, that they should, no MUST, quit their "whinning" and prove to you that they are not simply drug-addled.
God bless you, sir, and Exxon bless you as well.
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 9:22PM
jeff said...
Kimo wasn't denying climate change, he was saying it's happened before and well we weren't even around then so why are you all so quick to assume we are responsible for it now, hoping that we'll find some magical fix to stop it in its tracks. We're screwed if we don't stop dreaming of stopping it and start figuring out how to adapt to it. So uh...how long have you been a jackass, sir?
9-21-2009 @ 3:25PM
JB13 said...
Andrew, you state that global warming is occurring. Fine. But at no point did Kimo state it wasn't. Rather, his comment pertained entirely to the ardent belief among climate change hysterics that climate change is being caused by human activity, and, as such, we have an obligation to "do something" about it. You state yourself that you don't know what the cause is, and that it is a matter of debate. Seems to me you agree with Kimo more than you know or are willing to admit.
And yes, manmade global warming hysterics are akin to creationists in a number of ways. No, they most certainly do not hold the same beliefs. But their knee-jerk, frenzied reaction to any sort of demand for proof to back their respective beliefs shows that they, just as the creationists, operate largely on faith, rather than facts, as is demanded by real science. So the differences of their politics and religious belief (and non-belief) are not germane to this discussion in the slightest.
Global warming hysterics have spent a great amount of time accumulating proof that climate change is occurring. That's fine. But they have yet to demonstrate scientifically that human activity is the root cause or even a cause of the change. As Kimo pointed out, the climate has changed constantly throughout the Earth's history. To claim that we can do something about it without proof is hubris. And then to attempt to shout down and silence by means of ad hominem attack any and all who would demand such proof is the behavior of a frenzied religious mob, rather than enlightened people of science.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 4:57PM
Ed Drone said...
There seems to be a failure to communicate here.
Does global warming exist? Yes, it seems to be the case.
Does human activity cause it? Possibly, but probably it's due to both human and natural factors.
What can we do about it? We can't control the nature part, but we can do something about the human part.
If we can't stop nature, why stop man? Because man is making it worse. We don't have to be the only cause of a problem to be the ones to repair that part that we cause.
So, no, humans are not the only factor, but we are the main factor under our control. Science can influence nature (cloud-seeding for rain, for instance) but not control it. We can't even totally control ourselves, but we can try a lot harder than we've been doing, eh?
If what bothers the deniers is that folks are saying, "It's all our fault," then reply, "No, it isn't, but let's fix what we can, anyway." Any other reason for denial is just that, denial. And denial is not helpful.
Ed
9-21-2009 @ 9:21PM
mamabo1988 said...
Bravo, Ed! In an attempt to avoid "this will impress them" words, I shall put it more simpler words - clean up the mess we made, stop making the mess worse and figure out how to not make such a big mess from now on. Seems like a lesson we learned before kindergarten. Or are we destined to be another generation with the "someone else can get it", "don't look at me, I didn't do it", or "it's not my job" mentality? If you do, I hope you don't have children. You can't say it any clearer to them that you don't care what kind of future they or their children will have just because of semantics.
9-21-2009 @ 4:25PM
Sam Crutsinger said...
If an asteroid was headed for the planet that could destroy all life on Earth, would we have an obligation to "do something" about THAT?
Regardless of if you believe man is responsible for global warming, (I for one do believe it) getting off of burning coal and gasoline results in clean air and, down the road, cheaper electricity. Why would you fight against that?
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 4:25PM
Brandon said...
34th Coldest Summer - Need I say more?
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 4:45PM
Doug said...
"Coldest summer"? Where? Certainly not in the US's Pacific Northwest.
It's called Global Climate Change, not one freakish summer in the Midwest. (which I most thoroughly enjoyed)
9-21-2009 @ 5:28PM
Marc said...
Coldest summer in some areas also means hottest summer on record in others. Washington state had drought conditions. Home to one of the only rain forests in the northern hemisphere had drought conditions. Yes, in the American north east we had one of the coolest summers on record. We also had abnormal rainfall. Other places saw insane flooding... it's all part of global climate change and an average global temperature increase. This is not something you can stick your head out the window to detect on a global scale.
9-21-2009 @ 4:25PM
Marc said...
I don't invest much thought to the issue, but a few years back (March 07) NPR's intelligence squared held one of their best debates on this subject -- "Global Warming Is Not a Crisis" -- these people are far more intelligent than all of us and their arguments far more sound//exhaustive.
It's worth a listen. You can find it by googling "intelligence squared global warming"
or -- here's a link to it --
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9082151
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 4:40PM
brian said...
what happened to freedom of speech/press ? Right to assembly?
The cops had no right to detain them and confiscate the material.
Is this China we live in now? I hope the cops get sued and lose their jobs.
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 7:56PM
John Godoy said...
Thomas Friedman wishes it were...