U.S. workers choose layoffs over losing health benefits
Filed under: Economy, Healthcare
It appears U.S. employees are becoming increasingly cutthroat when it comes to preserving their health care benefits. A new survey says nearly half would prefer their employers lay off their coworkers rather than cut or eliminate their current health benefits. The survey also reveals employees are willing to take drastic actions, such as postponing a divorce or rushing into a marriage, to keep or obtain coverage.The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America conducted the survey, which will be released later this week. It examines employee attitudes toward changing or losing health benefits in the midst of perhaps the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.
When asked to choose between layoffs or losing health benefits if their employer had to take drastic action to stay in business, 46 percent chose layoffs while 44 percent opted to lose benefits. In fact, more full-time employees (52 percent) and more employees making more than $50,000 a year (54 percent) preferred layoffs to benefit reductions. The survey also says 57 percent of employees were willing to take a salary cut or give up a raise or bonus in order to maintain their current health benefits.
"It is surprising to see that nearly half of the U.S. workforce would rather have layoffs than cuts to their own benefits," said Guardian vice president of Group Life and Disability Insurance, Barry Petruzzi in a statement. He said employees who chose layoffs over cuts to benefits were anticipating that they would not be the ones let go, placing their ability to pay for health care costs above a fellow colleagues' need to feed their family by keeping a job.
"This underscores how much employees value their benefits," Petruzzi notes. "It also highlights the competitive nature of today's workforce."
Workers are willing to take such drastic measures to keep current benefits, even though there is mounting evidence that the cost of employer health insurance coverage has soared in recent years with no end in sight. On Tuesday, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a report showing that the average premiums for company-sponsored health insurance for families has jumped 131 percent since 1999, rising from $5,791 a year to $13,375.
Other results from the Guardian survey underscored increased competition among employees -- 25 percent of full-time employees said they were afraid or know someone who was afraid to take time off from work. Some 10 percent of pregnant or ill employees had similar fears. These fears are in part the result of employers taking actions such as requiring longer hours, adding job responsibilities or implementing layoffs and furloughs in response to the spiraling economy, which has placed increasing pressure on workers.
Workers changed behavior to maintain benefits in other ways as well. Eight percent of survey respondents were also willing to postpone a divorce to preserve health benefits and another 11 percent were willing to accelerate marriage plans to obtain benefits.
Nearly two-thirds of workers also indicated a willingness to pay a combination of higher deductible and higher premium to keep their current coverage. Most employees would accept an increase of $1,000 a year for individual coverage, or $2,000 to cover a family. However, the report suggests that workers still don't fully understand the true cost of health care. About 71 percent significantly underestimated or didn't know the costs of individual health coverage in comparison to group coverage. Such lack of understanding about the true costs of health care by consumers will make passing health care reforms that bring down the cost of care much more difficult to enact.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-16-2009 @ 7:42PM
PJD120 said...
I don't know who they surveyed, but I don't think I would want someone to lose there job over health care benefits. We workers and the company would have to come up with something else.
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 3:25PM
huh? said...
PJD120 said...
I don't know who they surveyed, but I don't think I would want someone to lose there job over health care benefits. We workers and the company would have to come up with something else.
....ASK THE UNIONS IN HAWAII.... SLIT THE THROATS OF YOUR CO-WORKERS SO YOU WON'T HAVE TO TAKE 3 DAYS OFF A MONTH. GOOD LIBERALS.... LOOKS GOOOD ON PAPER, BUT IN REALITY..... THEY'D EAT THEIR CHILDREN
9-17-2009 @ 10:07AM
Kathy said...
Often union workers are offered the option of taking a voluntary layoff with continued health care coverage. They can then collect unemployment as well as keep their health care coverage. Granted, unemployment benefits certainly do not take the place of your paycheck, but each time my company did this, enough employees volunteered for the layoff. None were involuntarily laid off.
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 11:33AM
e said...
even if you are a union worker and you get laid off, your health benefits only last for 30days and then you have to make a decision on whether you are going to pick up the cost or just not have any healthcare
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 1:27PM
Kathy said...
I accepted the voluntary furlough for four months with continued health care benefits paying nothing more for my coverage than if I had not taken the furlough, and could have taken it for a longer period had I not chosed to take early retirement. The catch here is that my union had negotiated this option prior to the need for it.
9-17-2009 @ 9:10PM
bob said...
Those that work hard, are skilled people, and producers, would certainly choose laying someone off compared to taking their health benefits. Why not? The liberal and union attitude of give me this, and I deserve this, bites the dust in hard times. The powers that be KNOW who makes the company money, and the good man is the last to go. This is why liberalism never works. Liberals vote for a gov't to take care of them. Conservatives vote for a gov't of opportunity, and take care of themselves.
Reply
9-23-2009 @ 8:03PM
Jesus said...
"Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."
That is why the liberals care for the poor, the sick, the lame and the homeless and follow me. Their reward will be great in heaven.
The conservatives, who think only of themselves and money while hypocritically thumping the Bible, will suffer for eternity.
Reply