Renowned photog Annie Leibovitz could face more lawsuits
Filed under: People, Investing
Annie Leibovitz will have an extra month to cope with her current financial situation, thanks to a recent court ruling. But she could be staring down another set of legal woes.
New York State Supreme Court Justice Bernard Fried ruled on Wednesday that the celebrity photographer has until October 1, 2009 to respond to a lawsuit that Art Capital Group filed. The art-focused bank has accused Leibovitz of failing to repay the $24 million she borrowed from it.
The decision does not change Leibovitz's obligation to pay back Art Capital Group by September 8, and a report by Bloomberg News suggests that even if she misses this deadline, Art Capital Group may not declare a default, as it could push her into bankruptcy, which could complicate repayment. The photographer's attorney, Steven Brawer of Lowenstein Sandler PC, wouldn't reveal whether settlement talks are being conducted.
Meanwhile, Italian photographer Paolo Pizzetti filed a suit against Leibovitz in U.S. District Court in New York, claiming that she had taken his photos and used them in an advertising campaign. According to Pizzetti, he was hired by Leibovitz to take photographs of scouting locations for advertisements to be run by Italian coffee company LavAzza in April 2008. The Trevi Fountain in Rome and Plaza San Marco in Venice were among the sites he shot. The photos were allegedly used in a LavAzza calendar of Leibovitz photography released last October – including the cover.
Pizzetti cites weather conditions, cloud formations and the appearance of a particular bird in the photographs according to the complaint filed. He continues that Leibovitz never said she planned to use his photographs and never sought permission to do so. Pizzetti is looking for a court order requiring that Leibovitz cease using the images, as well as pay $150,000 per infringement and other unspecified damages. A spokesman for Leibovitz has no comment, as he hasn't seen the filing yet.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 7)
9-06-2009 @ 2:29PM
Thom said...
Photographers are a squirmy, fussy, anal retentive lot. Truly disgusting. it takes NO talent to snap a damn picture.
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 3:42PM
mintrubble71 said...
That is a completely ignorant thing to say Thom. If it was that easy then every person w/a cell phone full of pics would be a famous & wealthy photographer. Anybody can take a picture, to take one interesting enough to make others want to look at it is a whole other thing. It takes talent, education & practice just like any other skill from being a musician to being a chef to being anything other than a dumb ass like you.
9-06-2009 @ 5:29PM
htc said...
Geez Thom, you're another one of those people on AOL who have the gift of being able to judge a whole segment of the population without ever having seen or met them. Somehow, AOL's boards seem to be replete with people like you. Mind sharing how you came to such a gross generalization of photographers you've never met?
9-06-2009 @ 9:28PM
Lizard said...
Isn't she the child pornographer, who took half-naked pics of Miley Cyrus?
9-07-2009 @ 8:15AM
Terri said...
Were that true so many millions of family photos would not have the heads cut off. Photography is art. It's timing, placement, and an intellegent, compassionate, intuitive third eye. You're probably just really that ugly.
9-07-2009 @ 9:23AM
Connie said...
I wish someone would hand you a camera...let's see if your shot would be worth $50million. Art is in the eye of the beholder, clearly you haven't an eye for anything but sh*t. Small minded assinine jerk. Annie L. is a giant among her peers, a brilliant photog.
9-08-2009 @ 5:31PM
philip A Moore said...
while it takes no talent to click a camera it takes alot of of talent to take a good pictures. Most people can't do it.
that why a picture you see on post card looks different then one in most a photo alblums
it sound to me like you either have never taken a photo class , don't know how to take pictures or is just out to start a debate .
people see things differently so there are millions of different stiles in photography .
look at the nude it is more the just tell a woman to put on make up and take off her clothes. there is lighting, keeping the woman comfortable , costuming and or back grounds (a nude picture with no thought to it is not the sexual ),
asking her what she doesn't mind doing costuming because she is posing for you it doesnt matter how much money she's being payed if she doesn't look like she injoying the setion the picture will look like crap and no amount of photoshop can fix that .
good day
9-07-2009 @ 12:13PM
NK said...
You sound jealous, ignorant and just plain bitter.
Now if you think photographers so lowly, go take a photograph or two, and see if 5 people will want to buy it for say, ah, 500.00 a piece. I bet you'd shut your stupid face then!!
Don't be so ignorant!!
9-07-2009 @ 12:12PM
darrellcolson said...
Any one can snap a picture. Until you can tell the difference between a picture and photo you need not speak!!! Don't show the work how dumb you really are.
9-07-2009 @ 3:15PM
Kathy A. said...
What an assinine thing to say. It's an art form. If you don't understand it, say you don't understand it.
9-08-2009 @ 6:48PM
Laura said...
It may take no talent to press the shutter, but it does take a creative vision to set up the shot.
9-08-2009 @ 7:05PM
NIKO said...
In photography either you have the eye or you don't.
9-08-2009 @ 9:18PM
clares said...
Your ignorance is showing, dear. Why are there major collections of photographs at major art museums? And just perhaps, if you knew something about art and about photographpy, you might understand why it counts.
9-06-2009 @ 2:24PM
John Hammersmith said...
As far as I now, AOL does not pimp for hookers.
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 10:40PM
rufus said...
1. was she ever pretty?
2. does she ever do her hair?
3. is she like the paparazzi? looks like she has as much class as they do.
4. those pros, take 100 pictures to get 1 good one. and they call them pros? hardly. never saw a carpenter pound 100 nails to get 1 good one.
5.some jobs/professions require little skill. this is one, same as politics.
6. looks like a homeless person.
9-06-2009 @ 4:55PM
gary said...
Thom, obviously you have never taken a good photograph unless it was by dumb luck. Good photos are the result of talent and wasting a lot of frames. If 1 in 100 are good, it's a good day.
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 3:01AM
Forge365 said...
Yeah I agree Gary. I am a semi-pro (I get paid once in a blue moon, mostly I shoot for photo credit and fun) photog. I have maybe 1 in 20 on a REALLY good day that ok, and maybe 1 in 20 of those are acceptable, and maybe, just maybe, if my subject is good, the lighting is perfect and I don't screw it up, I get 3 out of 400 that totally GREAT photos.
9-06-2009 @ 5:31PM
rudewaitress said...
Pay up Lebo. You still owe me that $60 tip you "promised you'd drop off over the weekend".
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 10:30PM
rufus said...
for all of the above that think its hard to take pictures.
i do fine with my digital, if you can't take decent pictures, you are all stupid. learn how to point the damn thing, morons. and she takes porno.
9-08-2009 @ 6:47PM
John Malone said...
Just bend over and he'll give you the "tip" you richly deserve.