Skip to Content

Ericsson surprised to find itself in partnership with South Korea

Text SizeAAA

Filed under: Company News, Technology

More

Two days ago, South Korea announced that Swedish telecom equipment manufacturer, Ericsson AB (ERIC) planned to spend $1.5 billion in South Korea to develop a high-speed wireless Internet technology. This program, which was scheduled to take five years, was allegedly backed by AT&T (T) and Verizon Wireless (VZ).

Before long, the web was rife with pictures and quotes from South Korean government officials proudly pontificating about the Ericsson deal. Under the agreement, the country was poised to become the test bed for Long Term Evolution (LTE), a futuristic wireless technology. Better yet, the deal was predicted to generate 1,000 new jobs in the country.

But then a somewhat befuddled Ericsson responded that it had no such plans in South Korea.

One would think that would be the end of it, but the confusion continued. Today, South Korea's presidential office, known as the Blue House, said once again that Ericsson may invest $1.5 billion in the country. According to the Blue House, Ericsson's new chief executive officer, Hans Vestberg, told officials at the Korea Communications Commission on July 11 that it would do just that.

While the agreement is hazy at best, it seems likely that Ericsson will eventually release LTE in South Korea. In the past, "The Land of the Morning Calm" has been a test bed for various wireless technologies, including WiMax, a high-speed interface that Sprint Nextel (S) and Clearwire have both said that they will deploy in the U.S. But WiMax has been slow to pick up, and South Korean companies are now warming up to Long Term Evolution, a fourth-generation (4G) wireless technology that will let users whisk data at even faster speeds than anything available today.

While LTE is similar in some ways to WiMax, it's a distinct technology. Although Sprint and Clearwire often bill WiMax as a 4G technology, this branding is largely indicative of an attempt to get a jump on existing third generation networks. At its core, however, WiMax is a 3G technology and was approved by telecom's standards body, the International Telecommunications Union, as a 3G standard in 2007.

While WiMax and LTE are both based on a similar technology, orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDM), there are key differences: WiMax offers users typical data speeds of 2 – 4 Mbps. LTE, on the other hand, will typically offer users data speeds up of 5 – 10 Mbps.

WiMax is currently being rolled out in the U.S., and some 120 million people are likely to have the service by the end of 2010. LTE, will likely come out next year, and already has tremendous support from manufacturers, including Ericsson, Sony Ericsson, Alcatel-Lucent (ALU), NEC (NIPNF), NextWave Wireless (WAVE), Nokia (NOK) and Nokia Siemens Networks. According to Infonetics Research, sales of LTE equipment are expected to reach $5 billion by 2013.

Many carriers around the world also plan to use LTE. Japan's NTT DoCoMo (DCM) says that it will introduce the service in 2010; in Europe, Vodafone Group and Deutsche Telekom AG's T-Mobile have announced that they also have LTE plans. Here in the U.S., long-time CDMA operator Verizon Wireless says it will switch over to LTE for its 4G future. The big question is whether Sprint Nextel may do the same.

Last week, Sprint Nextel announced that it would pay up to $5-billion over the next seven years to L. M. Ericsson Telephone to handle the daily operations of its network; this will allow Sprint to focus on developing new products and retaining its fleeing customers. While Sprint says that move has nothing to do with its dedication to WiMax, it certainly is conceivable that it will eventually make the jump to LTE as well.

Interest Rates

5/1 ARM+4.06%APR: +3.75%
30 Yr.
Fixed Mort.
+5.03%APR: +5.16%
$30K
HELOC
+8.00%APR: 0.00%
30 Mo
New Car Loan
+6.77%APR: 0.00%
1 Yr. CD+1.57%APR: +1.58%
DailyFinance Writers
Melly Alazraki Melly Alazraki Financial writer and analyst
James Altucher James Altucher Financial columnist
Jeff Bercovici Jeff Bercovici Media columnist
Jonathan Berr Jonathan Berr Financial writer and media columnist
Mercedes Cardona Mercedes Cardona Retail reporter
Tim Catts Tim Catts Financial writer
Peter Cohan Peter Cohan Author, venture capitalist and financial writer
Carrie Coolidge Carrie Coolidge Financial writer
Lita Epstein Lita Epstein Financial writer
Sam Gustin Sam Gustin Technology Writer
Nikhil Hutheesing Nikhil Hutheesing Tech and investing editor
Joseph Lazzaro Joseph Lazzaro Markets and economics writer
Latif Lewis Michelle Leder Financial Columnist
Latif Lewis Latif Lewis Business news editor and management columnist
Anthony Massucci Anthony Massucci Senior writer and tech columnist
Doug McIntyre Doug McIntyre Business and investing news writer and editor
Michael Mercurio Michael Mercurio Managing Editor
Todd Pruzan Todd Pruzan Features editor
Michael Rainey Michael Rainey Editor and economics writer
Alex Salkever Alex Salkever Senior technology writer
David Schepp David Schepp Business News reporter
Matthew Scott Matthew Scott Investing reporter and editor
Dan Solin Daniel R. Solin Author, investment advisor and retirement expert
Amey Stone Amey Stone Executive editor
Bruce Watson Mark Svenvold Columnist, renewable energy
Russel Turk, M.D. Russell Turk, M.D. Healthcare policy columnist
Bruce Watson Bruce Watson Features Writer
my portfolios

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance than anywhere else.

Create a New Portfolio My Portfolios

Daily Finance Partners

More from the Weblogs Network