AIG directors abandon ship
Filed under: Company News, Earnings
When the going gets tough, the tough get going. That's true in life and in troubled corporations, such as American International Group Inc. (AIG).Only three out of the 11 directors who oversaw the New York-based company as it began its death spiral remain on the board following yesterday's shareholder's meeting, according to CNN/Money. Six of the board members decided not to seek reelection. They apparently didn't show up at the meeting either.
According to corporate governance expert Nell Minow, the board is probably keeping on some former members to allow for some continuity, but they should eventually quit as well. She added that "it would be unthinkable" for them to stay.
"Everything about the current situation is unprecedented," Minow, editor of the Corporate Library, told DailyFinance. "This will be a business school case study forever."
Chief Executive Edward Liddy, who was recently pummeled by outraged members of Congress over the company's bonus payments, told shareholders that there was an "excellent chance" that the insurer would be able to pay back the more than $180 billion it received from the federal government to avoid going bankrupt. The trouble is that he won't be sticking around for AIG's rebirth. As soon as a replacement is named, Liddy, a former CEO of Allstate Corp. (ALL), is riding off into the sunset -- again.
Some have argued that Liddy, who took his job after the company's problems were discovered, was unfairly maligned, an argument rejected by Minow.
"I think he was necessarily beaten up by members Congress," she said. "The buck stops with him."
Morale has to be awful at AIG. The company's name has become a punch line for late-night comics looking for a cheap laugh about corporate greed. Unfortunately for AIG, its shareholders and employees, the government is calling the shots these days since it owns about about 80 percent of the insurer. Shareholders, in particular, will be getting shafted.
The company pulled its shares from penny-stock land through a 1-for-20 stock split. Wall Street is not buying the gimmick and sent the insurer's stock down more than 13 percent to $20. However, the stock has rebounded considerably from its 52-week low of 33 cents.
Shareholder Kenneth Steiner is quoted by CNN/Money as saying he will not miss the departing directors.
"They left like rats leaving a sinking ship," he said. "Well, goodbye and good riddance."
"Everything about the current situation is unprecedented," Minow, editor of the Corporate Library, told DailyFinance. "This will be a business school case study forever."
Chief Executive Edward Liddy, who was recently pummeled by outraged members of Congress over the company's bonus payments, told shareholders that there was an "excellent chance" that the insurer would be able to pay back the more than $180 billion it received from the federal government to avoid going bankrupt. The trouble is that he won't be sticking around for AIG's rebirth. As soon as a replacement is named, Liddy, a former CEO of Allstate Corp. (ALL), is riding off into the sunset -- again.
Some have argued that Liddy, who took his job after the company's problems were discovered, was unfairly maligned, an argument rejected by Minow.
"I think he was necessarily beaten up by members Congress," she said. "The buck stops with him."
Morale has to be awful at AIG. The company's name has become a punch line for late-night comics looking for a cheap laugh about corporate greed. Unfortunately for AIG, its shareholders and employees, the government is calling the shots these days since it owns about about 80 percent of the insurer. Shareholders, in particular, will be getting shafted.
The company pulled its shares from penny-stock land through a 1-for-20 stock split. Wall Street is not buying the gimmick and sent the insurer's stock down more than 13 percent to $20. However, the stock has rebounded considerably from its 52-week low of 33 cents.
Shareholder Kenneth Steiner is quoted by CNN/Money as saying he will not miss the departing directors.
"They left like rats leaving a sinking ship," he said. "Well, goodbye and good riddance."
D-Day for Harry Reid: Can he wrangle 60 votes for Senate health bill?
Fed stalls on Chinese bank deal, costs taxpayers $1.7 billion
Dell in a handbasket: Should founder Michael Dell resign?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-05-2009 @ 12:32PM
darthfury78 said...
The possible reason for the reverse stock split was for the executives to issue themselves a fresh load of shares at the adjusted share price. Had the investors VOTED against the 1-20 reverse stock split, AIG would have had no choice but to allow the stock to rise on its own until it was able to reach $5.00 to $10.00 a share, which would have led the stock to a healthy recovery.
But now that option is gone. Reverse stock splits has never work to the benefit of anyone. It simply means that the company's leadership are a bunch of dumbasses. And now I stand corrected. I kept my 6000 shares until the outcome of the shareholders meeting. If they had said no to the reverse stock split, I would have kept the shares. However, a YES vote would made me sell off the shares right away because I knew what was going to happen next.
I only wished that the shareholders meeting was held in May so that I could have sold off my shares at $1.70 a share instead of $1.13. Always follow your gut instincts. I bought 6000 shares of AIG at .58 cents a shares. I feel sorry for those who got the stock last year and have now lost their entire lfe savings, thanks to a bunch of idiots in charge of AIG. The company was much better under Hank Greenburg until the jealous Board of Directors got rid of him. If these people had run IBM in the early 1990s, IBM would not be around today. If they were in charge of Apple Corp., instead of Steve Jobs, the company would have filed for backruptcy and would have been liquidated by now. A company is only as good as its leadership management. AIG has lost that edge when it got rid of Hank Greenburg.
Reply