U.S. industrial production falls, factory use hits record low
Filed under: Economy
The nation's industrial sector remains mired in the mud. Production at U.S. factories fell for the 16th time in the last 17th months -- with capacity utilization hitting a record low, the U.S. Federal Reserve announced Tuesday. Output at U.S. factories declined 1.1 percent in May, the Fed said, with factory utilization falling to a record-low 68.3 percent from 69.1 percent in April. In addition, industrial production has now fallen 13.4 percent in the last 12 months-- the largest annual decline for the nation's industrial sector since 1946.
Further, capacity utilization is now 12.6 percentage points below its long-term average, the Fed said. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected industrial production to decline 1.0 percent and capacity utilization to fall to 68.4 percent in May.
Green shoots, yes, but no roaring bull
Bruce Kasman, chief economist for JPMorgan Chase, said all the talk about the need to raise interest rates on a strengthening economy is premature.
"Current policy rates look set to remain appropriate for some time to come," Kasman told Reuters Tuesday.
Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist for Maria Fiorini Ramirez Inc. in New York, concurred, citing weak aggregate demand.
"The rate of decline has slowed, but there are lots of problems that have yet to be cleaned up," Shapiro told Bloomberg News Tuesday. "We're going to be bouncing along the bottom for a protracted period of time."
Investors should pay attention to industrial production and capacity utilization data because although manufacturing accounts for less than 20 percent of U.S. GDP, it accounts for most of the nation's cyclical growth. Continual declines in production point to a softening economy; rising, the reverse. A low capacity utilization rate usually reflects softer demand; a high rate, strong demand, with the potential for increased price pressure.
In May, mining output declined 2.1 percent, utilities declined 1.4 percent, high-tech production dropped 1.9 percent, and motor vehicle output plunged 7.9 percent.
Economic Analysis: When will the contraction in the nation's industrial sector end? Economists are hoping it will be Q2/Q3, but at this juncture that time period looks like an optimistic assessment, not a realistic one. What's clear is that the nation's economy is in the midst of a restructuring.
Without question, a considerable portion of the industrial activity that has been eliminated will not re-appear: it's been shifted to lower-cost production centers overseas -- a globalization era reality. That underscores the need for the United States to identify and create new, value-added industrial, technology sectors (including information technology, infrastructure, health care, biotech, high-end, tech-intensive manufacturing, and renewable energy) to help make up for the loss of classic industrial output and jobs.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-16-2009 @ 12:49PM
Iridium said...
"That underscores the need for the United States to identify and create new, value-added industrial, technology sectors (including information technology, infrastructure, health care, biotech, high-end, tech-intensive manufacturing, and renewable energy) to help make up for the loss of classic industrial output and jobs."
There is not enough production in all of these sectors combined to provide for the well being of the total US economy. Much of the high tech sector is very low volume and completed using very little labor.
You culd increase the production of medical supplies 10,000% and not make back the lost output of one automobile factory.
Working in consumer products I know where the real economy lays. Which do you think adds more to a region?
1) A dirty bronze factory outside of Pittburgh
2) A high tech medical product facility outside of Pittsburgh
-----------------
The answer:
#1 the dirty bronze factory that closed due to increased competition from China and increased EPA regulations.
The Bronze factory employed 250 people. The high tech medical equipment plant, 20. See the high tech plant used multimillion dollar machines manufactured in Europe to spit out thousands of syringes and caps every hour. They sell for less than a penny each and could not be manufatured at profit using manual labor.
The only labor needed is in the office and a couple guys to watch the machines. The high tech sector does not create jobs, as much as Obama and his like would want you to believe.
You may need 100 workers to build a solar plant, but after it is built you might only need 5 techs to keep the place running. A steel mill employs hundreds of workers for thier entire life. What would you rather have?
Reply
9-14-2009 @ 3:41AM
Peter said...
It is, on balance "yet another report that fits within the picture of an economy contracting more slowly but still far from an actual recovery," said Paul Ashworth, an economist at Capital Economics, in a report. Accountants Yorkshire and Foreign Currency.
Reply