The ISPs and communications trade associations are lobbying for a bill (pdf) currently under consideration in the North Carolina House of Representatives that would impose restrictions on public funding of broadband access, including prohibiting towns from using any of the billions of dollars of federal stimulus money that has been targeted for developing the nation's broadband access. The ISPs argue that such public networks undercut their ability to build and sell internet access.

The Telecommunications Industry Association recently pointed out several developing areas in which broadband will play an essential role (pdf): telemedicine and networked medical records, teleworking, e-government, small business support, public safety, national security, improved transportation, aid for the disabled, and help for rural areas. Its view is that the government should support the private ISPs as they expand their subscription-based services, and should focus its attention on helping the people get computers with which to access the internet.

Looking at this list, though, I have to wonder if internet access shouldn't be considered, like traffic control, police, fire protection, and the like, an essential service that should be provided to all residents of the U.S. by the government and funded by tax dollars. The actual connectivity could be offered directly, by publicly-built networks, or through the ISPs by subsidizing access. Left to the market, I fear all too many people living in areas where profits are hard to come by will be denied what has become an essential service.