Back to Mobile View

Pay-as-you-go emergency medical services not the recession 911 they seem

Posted 11:30AM 03/23/09
3 Comments Print Text Size A A A
UPDATE: As some commenters have pointed out, Santa Rosa subcontracts its ambulance services to an outside provider. Consequently, the emergency EMS services discussed in this post do not include ambulance service.

That having been said, the Santa Rosa proposal proposes partnerships with ambulance services that could help reduce ambulance costs. Also, as this piece noted, many municipalities already charge for EMS services; in fact, some towns and counties in Southern California have been billing their citizens since the early 1980's.

Recently, some news outlets reported that the town of Santa Rosa, California, would begin charging for 911 calls and paramedic services. Hailing this as some sort of apocalyptic recessionary nightmare, the reporters seemed to suggest that this was a sign of vile things to come.

The truth is that the people of Santa Rosa already pay for 911 phone calls -- as, in all likelihood, do you. Basically, almost all land lines (and many cell phone lines) charge a set fee for emergency call services. What Santa Rosa is doing is attempting to trim its budget by having citizens directly shoulder more of the costs of their emergency medical services. Again, this is a step that scores of other municipalities have already taken.

When most people are receiving emergency medical service, their minds aren't on the price. However, first response services aren't cheap: from buying electrodes to renting back boards, patients (or their insurance companies) can often expect to pay a small fortune before they even get examined by a doctor.

To help keep the price down, Santa Rosa has proposed a voluntary EMS subscription fee. Under this plan, citizens would pay $4 per month to support the town's emergency services; alternately, they would have to pay $350 for EMS services -- in much the same way municipalities offer sewer-line insurance. Clever idea, right? And one that Santa Rosa borrowed from lots of other California towns, which are already charging between $3 and $6.75 per month.

While the idea of paying for an EMS isn't attractive, it is preferable to having an area scrimp on medical care or reduce services to save money. If the price of a decent EMS program is the cost of a Happy Meal per month, then maybe even more towns should adopt Santa Rosa's program. And maybe the media should save its recession-induced hysteria for the nightmare scenarios really worth worrying about.
Tagged: dont miss
Bruce Watson

Bruce Watson

Features Writer

 Bruce Watson is a features writer for DailyFinance, focusing on the political and cultural effects of economic events. A contributor to Military Lessons of the Persian Gulf War, A Chronology of the Cold War at Sea, the Journal of American Philosophy, A Cafe in Space, and the forthcoming Peanut Butter, Gooseberries, and Latkes!  He has also worked as a research assistant in the British House of Commons and at the United States Naval Institute.

SUBSCRIBE TO:
RSS

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum
Newswire

Compare Mortgage Rates

Mortgage Rates by Zillow
Follow Us

Headlines From DailyFinance Partners

CNN Money
CNBC
Smart Money
Consumer Reports
Huffington Post
AOL Energy
AOL Jobs
Business News Personal Finance Investing Our Partners

DailyFinance Sitemap | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | HELP | Advertise With Us

© Copyright 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved