- Days left
Taxpayers are rightfully outraged at the paying of bonuses to AIG executives, in light of the enormous bailout with taxpayer funds. But the last solution they should want to this problem is a huge tax levied against the recipients of the bonus money.

Sure, a massive income tax sounds good when it's happening to someone else. But what about if it was happening to you? If you think the average taxpayer can't become the victim of a massive money grab by politicians, you're wrong. Even this tax on AIG employees is hitting innocent parties.

How can that be? The tax bill passed by the House of Representatives by a vote of 328 to 93 imposes the income tax on families with income above $250,000 and wages from AIG. What about the family with one spouse working at AIG and another spouse at a separate company? If their income is over $250,000, they're going to be hit by this. Is it fair that the spouse's income (unrelated to AIG) is included in that $250,000 threshold? No, it's not.
But even worse is the basic principle of our government enacting a tax that takes away almost all of a taxpayer's income. When we allow this to happen once, we open the door for it to happen over and over again in the future. This is not the role of our government. We should not let them steal more and more money from taxpayers. And with the spending frenzy our government is in, the only way to pay for it is by taxing more. Where does it end? It doesn't. The taxes get higher and higher, and no taxpayer will be immune.

If there's a problem with how federal bailout funds are being spent, the answer is not to tax the individuals who have indirectly received some of the bailout money. The answer is to not do the bailouts in the first place. Any company that needs charity from the taxpayers to stay in business ought to fail. Let the free market work.

Yes, there would have been some pain from the failure of AIG. But it certainly can't be any worse than the pain being inflicted on future generations who will have to foot the bill for the trillions of dollars being given away to failing companies. Let's redirect our anger toward the proper parties: Our lawmakers who are recklessly spending our money on these ridiculous bailouts.

Forensic accountant Tracy Coenen investigates corporate fraud and consumer scams, and is the author of Expert Fraud Investigation and Essentials of Corporate Fraud.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Banking Services 101

Understand your bank's services, and how to get the most from them

View Course »

Timing Your Spending

How to pay less by changing when you purchase.

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

10 Tax Tips for the Suddenly Unemployed

If you are facing unexpected unemployment, you may be eligible for a variety of income tax benefits. Losing a job is always hard, but these tax tips should help you maximize your tax refund.

Does Your Company Need to File Form 1095-B?

A company is responsible for filing IRS Form 1095-B only if two conditions apply: It offers health coverage to its employees, and it is "self-insured." This means that the company itself pays its employees' medical bills, rather than an insurance company. A company that doesn't meet both conditions won't have to deal with Form 1095-B. Its employees might still receive a 1095-B, but from their insurer, not the employer.

What is the Difference Between Forms 1094-C and 1095-C?

IRS Forms 1094-C and 1095-C are filed by employers that are required to offer health insurance coverage to their employees under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. The main difference between them is that the 1095-C provides information about health insurance and is sent to both employees and the IRS, while the 1094-C acts as a cover sheet about the 1095-C and is sent only to the IRS.

What is Employer Sponsored Coverage?

The term "employer-sponsored coverage" refers to health insurance obtained through an employer -- the most common way Americans get insurance. Employer-sponsored coverage includes not only insurance for current employees and their families, but can also include retired employees. Further, federal law gives former employees the right to stay on their employer's health insurance, at their own expense, for a time after leaving a job. That, too, is employer-sponsored coverage.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum