The auto bailout could cost $100 billion
Filed under: Company News, Economy
General Motors Corp. (GM) and Chrysler have received $17.4 billion in U.S. funds (so far), which they received only after much congressional teeth gnashing. Meanwhile, American International Group (AIG) snaps its fingers and over the weekend and some Treasury officials give it another $30 billion -- bringing its total to $180 billion. But thanks to the worst February in 27 years, the auto industry will likely catch up fast.
February's plunge in auto sales is a result of the realization by many Americans that they can keep their current cars running longer -- and even if their cars are broken, they can't get the financing to buy a new one and they certainly can't pay cash for a car. It's just too expensive. GM's sales fell 53%, Ford Motor Co.'s (F) sales declined 43% and Chrysler suffered a 44% drop. Incentives are not working -- the average incentive per vehicle sold is up 8% to $2,914. Only Hyundai, which lets buyers give back their car if they lose their jobs- bucked the trend; its sales fell only 2%.
When you consider that GM recently gave the U.S. a demand forecast of 11.23 million vehicles for the industry in 2009, you realize that it's worth analyzing whether that number is too optimistic. And if so -- last month GM's figure looked to be 17% higher than January's 43% plunge indicated, it's likely that the amount of money GM will request is much lower than it will actually need when the reality of an ongoing 50% or more plunge in demand continues to sink in.
Then GM's demand for $30 billion could double to $60 billion; Chrysler will ask for $12 billion more instead of $5 billion and Ford will finally be forced to put its hand out and beg for government aid.
These costly bailouts prove that the surest route to success in America is to fail massively. It's a lesson for the kids out there.
Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and is the author of You Can't Order Change: Lessons from Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing. He owns AIG and shares and has no financial interest in the other securities mentioned.
D-Day for Harry Reid: Can he wrangle 60 votes for Senate health reform bill?
Fed stalls on Chinese bank deal, costs taxpayers $1.7 billion
Dell in a handbasket: Should founder Michael Dell resign?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-04-2009 @ 1:51PM
Mike G. said...
100 million would still be less than they are wasting on AIG and we should have more to show for it.
Reply
3-04-2009 @ 4:43PM
Vic said...
The Automakers (and the United States of America) would be better off if they failed, went bankrupt and re-organized. They would be better off, car prices would drop. People would buy cars from a company that they had confidence in and we would ALL be better off. Kick out the high paid "do-nothings" that have run these compaines in the ground.
Reply
3-04-2009 @ 9:02PM
Tim said...
Why should we save companies that farm most of their parts and assembly to foreign countries. If these cars were made in America by Americans I would feel differently but, the only American's benefiting are the stuffed shirt fat cats that ran these firms into the ground. Time to cut our loses.
Reply