How to eat (decently) on a dollar a day

×
For the last couple of weeks, Rebecca Currie has spent approximately $1 per day on food. Normally a frugal shopper (she spends an average of $80 a month at the grocery store), she embarked on this experiment to show how ultra-cheap eating can not only help consumers save money, but could even improve the quality of their diets. Displaying her findings on her blog, she is making it clear that cheap food and poor eating don't have to go hand-in-hand.

Currie is hardly the first person to explore the wonders of super-cheap cuisine. In The Man Who Ate Everything, author Jeffrey Steingarten spends a chapter exploring various methods of subsistence cooking and offering recipes like "Sludge," a ground beef-based Depression era dish that is like meatloaf, minus much of the flavor. For that matter, thrifty consumers from the Manson family to today's "freegans" have discovered the wonders of harvesting free, if somewhat wilted, produce. For that matter, Currie herself was inspired by the One Dollar Diet Project, a blog in which two California high school teachers documented their month-long attempt to eat for only $1 a day.

Reading the blog, Currie realized that the participants, Christopher Greenslate and Kerri Leonard, were fairly uncreative in their menu choices. For example, she notes that they consistently ate oatmeal for breakfast and peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for lunch. This uninspired menu not only had negative health effects (for example, Greenslate didn't have enough energy to go to the gym), but also made the pair desperate for the end of their experiment. In fact, in their first day off the diet, Greenslate and Leonard immediately spent $20 each on food.

Currie's blog demonstrates that a $1 a day diet doesn't necessarily have to translate into uninspired or unhealthy food choices. Rather than plan a month's worth of meals, she has set out with $1 every day, seeking food choices that would leave her feeling creative and sated, not weary and disgusted.

Tied in with this quest for interesting, healthy food at bargain basement prices, Currie is also trying to demonstrate that cheap food isn't necessarily bad food. As a 2008 article in the New York Times noted, there is a common perception that high-calorie, low-nutrient food is cheaper than healthier fare. While she acknowledges that this is true in the case of fast food and convenience foods, in a broader context, it may be false. By carefully preparing her own meals, Currie is showing that budget cuisine doesn't necessarily translate into junk food.

Over the course of her sixteen days, Currie has prepared a pretty broad selection of meals, including pasta with spinach and marinara, chicken fried rice, and black beans with rice and jalapeno. While her diet has skewed heavily toward high-protein legumes, whole grains, and eggs, it has also displayed a reasonable amount of flavor, a tendency toward fresh, healthy ingredients, and a pretty impressive amount of flavor. In short, while it may not be an ideal diet for everyone, Currie has shown that most of us probably have a lot of room to reduce our food expenditures!

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Banking Services 101

Understand your bank's services, and how to get the most from them

View Course »

Getting out of debt

Everyone hates debt. Get out of it.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

2 Comments

Filter by:
Dave Lynch

If eating HEALTHILY on a budget is a concern I would ask that you check out my new book http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007BSD1UA/ref=as_li_ss_il?ie=UTF8&tag=menswea-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B007BSD1UA

February 22 2012 at 10:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Barbara

I know there are a lot of people struggling out there. I know words will not suffice what is going on all over this Country of ours. A lot of blame is going on
which unfortunetly does nothing whatesoever to create jobs or put food on the table of the hungry.
Blaming Republicans or Democrats, liberals or conservatives does not pinpoint anything. The folks that were really responsible for this mess is the movers and shakers (the top 5% of the wealthy) along with some help from banks, wallstreet,
corporations, etc. When NAFTA was passed in 1993 this was the start of the economic slide which of course toOK some years to go full cycle.
The economic bomb that was dropped on America mainly came from people within this country. It was far worse though less noticable than planeS crashing into buildings such as what happened on Sept 11, 2001. On that day Terrorist from Islamic nations CRASHED 3 buildings and there was a tremendous public uproar.
Yet month after month jobs were being sent overseas CRASHING our economy, though of course it took much longer to see the effect as there was no smoke or fire.
I betcha that if CEOS'S lost their jobs and medical benefits jobs wouldn't be going overseas so quickly.

December 19 2010 at 7:13 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply