Welcome to Daily Finance
Filed under: Economy, Investing
Welcome to DailyFinance, a new web site offering business and financial news and analysis. Our goal is to combine the immediacy and conversational tone of blogs with the serious reporting and financial expertise of traditional journalism, and to serve it up with the best in online data and investing tools.
Our goals are ambitious, but we're starting today in beta with a simple blog format. We're still assembling our team of top-notch journalists and financial experts, and integrating a new set of calculators and tools. DailyFinance is part of the AOL Money & Finance family of sites and readers of our sister sites, BloggingStocks and WalletPop, will recognize some of our writers.
Our mission at DailyFinance is to help our readers navigate through perilous economic times and make better decisions about the future. We will offer timely, independent news and commentary. We also will cover topics that aren't in the daily flow of news, with reports from our growing team of skilled reporters who will be digging to find scams and prod lax regulators. Our team includes seasoned writers and analysts with skeptical natures and a shared mission to uncover the truth. We won't sugarcoat and we won't hype. With every story we aim to tell you not just what is happening, but what you can do about it.
Given our mission of not just reporting the news, but being a resource to our readers, we need to hear from you. Please leave your suggestions in the comments and let us know what you like or don't like. Tell us about your experiences and we may call you up for an interview. We want to connect with our readers on a one-one-one basis whenever possible.
As DailyFinance finds its footing, we'll focus on what we do best and what our readers find most valuable.
Thank you for visiting and please come back again.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-17-2009 @ 12:42PM
Fred Tylutki said...
I am surprised that there is not more talk about correcting FASB157. This accounting change is one of the reasons that banks have lost so much of the value. I think it needs to be addressed quickly, in the very least suspended till a better rule can be implemented.
Reply
2-17-2009 @ 12:57PM
amey stone said...
thanks frank, that's a good idea. we'll look into it.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 10:33PM
r pastor said...
support santellis tea party,plz strong arm politics/no negotiation needs to stop
Reply
2-25-2009 @ 3:07PM
r pastor said...
support tea party joe the plumber now RICK the BROKER
Reply
2-26-2009 @ 2:17PM
GAnderson said...
Daily Finance appears to offer a modulated response to the hysteria so prevalent in most media sources. Rational thought is in short supply!
Reply
3-06-2009 @ 1:13PM
William A Harmon said...
I have been sending this to as many governmeny official as I can. It is time we stood up and let them know that we need help
Dear ,
I recently had to take a twenty percent cut in pay to keep my primary job, yes I work two jobs to get by, something a lot of us are doing today. I had to do this to help the company I work for get through these hard economic times. It was not a choice I wanted to make but it is better than no job at all.
I propose that the President and all the members of Congress take a cut in pay to help the Country close the budget gap. A fifteen percent cut would save millions.
I am asking that you take this suggestion to the Congressional floor. It would be a popular move with the voters and show that the elected officials of our Government are willing to do their part as individuals to cut costs. Not just talk about it.
Sincerely
William A. Harmon
Sandwich Ma.
Reply
3-12-2009 @ 4:30PM
Ed Jenkins said...
Unfortunately, Jon Stewart is a joke. The fact that the federal budget is now about 4 times larger than Reagan's last budget, is unknown by a growing uninformed electorate. Santelli's rant came from a real understanding.
Reply
3-13-2009 @ 6:56PM
Harper said...
Love the fantasy that elected officials would share in the financial burden they've imposed on their constituents. Voluntary paycuts will never happen, despite whatever rhetoric office holders or seekers may use to pander to the audience of the day. People in the real world work force, who are actually having their salaries cut, do not have the knowledge or power needed to bring about mandated cuts in governmental salaries. It's a crooked game, but if you don't play you can't win - and if you do play, we still lose.
Reply
3-22-2009 @ 5:13PM
Matt Scherer said...
President Barack Obama and others elected leaders are complaining about the runaway costs of health benefits, but small businesses could cut costs if they did an annual review of their claims paid to premium dollars.
For most companies, the claims to premium ratio hovers somewhere at 30-percent. With the major carriers averaging about 20-percent for administrative costs, that leaves them with a 50-percent profit.
Because the sales process for most companies involve the human resource managers, few question an increase because they haven't reviewed their claims costs. Businesses could cut their costs if someone on their staff understood their claims to premium ratio. Senior executives should encourage someone like from their CFO or their CPA to work with their human resources administrators to review this data.
This simple process could save businesses millions of dollars.
Reply
4-14-2009 @ 8:01AM
Mark Comerford said...
I have one question that I hope you can answer or at least speculate on. Why did all the money go to the banks and assorted AIGs and not instead to the general population ?
The gov't wants the people to spend money to stimulate the economy when we have no money to spend. Greenspan the two faced leader of the FED spoke simultaneously fo how the economy is consumer driven and remonstrated us on the other face on why we didn't have enough savings.
I don't think they know how out of touch they are.
The middle class is not only broke but have no jobs to go to as industry has been allowed to leave for the benefit the rich. Now what ?
Reply
4-10-2009 @ 6:24PM
H. sorensen said...
how in the world can one read your articles. They are so small one would need a magnifying glass to read your coments.
Reply